What’s the point of presenting only one side of the story? If fairness and neutrality truly matter, then his response should have been shared as well. Yet, I haven’t seen a single post from any of you highlighting his side.
She’s made basic mistakes about Islam that even children with a foundational understanding would recognize as completely wrong. She claimed she saw him as a god, which is blatant shirk, said she would shake hands with the devil, and even made du'a for him and his children to get cancer. These aren’t minor slips, they raise valid concerns and make many aspects of the situation feel questionable.
Let’s also not ignore the fact that he has many enemies, largely because of the work he does for the religion. A quick look on YouTube shows the kinds of people capitalizing on this controversy, using sensationalist, clickbait titles to exploit the situation and push their own agendas.
If he is truly guilty of what she’s accusing him of, then the truth will eventually come out. It shouldn’t be difficult for her to provide solid evidence to put this case to rest, and he will be held accountable by the Almighty. But until such evidence is presented, there’s simply nothing to go on, and we should be cautious about rushing to judgment.

It’s one of those rare moments where Islamophobes, ex-Muslims, Muslims, and feminist groups have all united across the internet over this case,despite there being a serious lack of evidence.
His response