The developed world politics is much older and grounded in a longer history or at least one with some national memory either written or traditions that serves as the rule of law which their locals believe in, from this stabilising foundation of a rule of law(constitution or monarchy) it has public confidence and their national politics is grounded in ideas and they debate it with intelligence before putting it up for their locals to decide thru a contest called elections.
This has given them the breathing space to develop and not worry about internal instability or putting out fires locally or spending so much of their budget on prisons, police, military(to ward of foreign nations who want to capitalise on their vulnerability.
You could argue they have have alot of social ills such as identity politics, discrimination, media and business or other special interest groups who play a behind the scene role and yes it's probably corruption that is just underplayed or overlooked by the society.
But the developed world which I class as anything not having a rule of law that is supported with confidence by all sections of its society and is only a nation in name only or thru the barrel of the gun, these nations don't have strong stabilising foundations and will forever be prone to interference whether locally or foreign who knows this because if your people don't feel their state is in their interest it's bound to become fragile and only time is the question and what geopolitical interest is keeping that rogue state with no public cobfidence alive.
But the developed world is also not politics grounded in ideas or contest but it's more about identity politics(sectarian, religious, ethnic, caste, clan, or anything social based) it's definitely not politics grounded in ideas for the betterment of the society economic, security, education sort of politics. Their more concerned with keeping the state alive from internal vulnerability and foreign interference these developing countries which is a key marker I have spotted.
Their govt are always run by some dictator or thru some democracy in name only elections but identity politics is at the core of their bogus elections. They also seem to always use the state for purposes such as land dispossession of other internal groups they deem hostile, use puppets or Trojans to interfere with the targetted group or region.
They basically just thugs in my view the developed world politics who use politics as a means to gain more land holdings of other internal groups who are not in power or they use it to build up animosity by pitting ruling class on the non ruling class in their lands(isku dir). All this is done because the state is basically inherited from colonial legacy is my suspicion and they haven't formed a real national identity internally and only use it externally outside its borders as everyone is more loyal to their pre existing social identity before colonialism.
They also suffer the severest form of personal, family, cronyism interests guiding their leadership with identity politics all mixed into it and lack of a rule of law with public confidence to make up their deadly cocktail of a state.
That's DR Osman view of the developed and developing world politics
This has given them the breathing space to develop and not worry about internal instability or putting out fires locally or spending so much of their budget on prisons, police, military(to ward of foreign nations who want to capitalise on their vulnerability.
You could argue they have have alot of social ills such as identity politics, discrimination, media and business or other special interest groups who play a behind the scene role and yes it's probably corruption that is just underplayed or overlooked by the society.
But the developed world which I class as anything not having a rule of law that is supported with confidence by all sections of its society and is only a nation in name only or thru the barrel of the gun, these nations don't have strong stabilising foundations and will forever be prone to interference whether locally or foreign who knows this because if your people don't feel their state is in their interest it's bound to become fragile and only time is the question and what geopolitical interest is keeping that rogue state with no public cobfidence alive.
But the developed world is also not politics grounded in ideas or contest but it's more about identity politics(sectarian, religious, ethnic, caste, clan, or anything social based) it's definitely not politics grounded in ideas for the betterment of the society economic, security, education sort of politics. Their more concerned with keeping the state alive from internal vulnerability and foreign interference these developing countries which is a key marker I have spotted.
Their govt are always run by some dictator or thru some democracy in name only elections but identity politics is at the core of their bogus elections. They also seem to always use the state for purposes such as land dispossession of other internal groups they deem hostile, use puppets or Trojans to interfere with the targetted group or region.
They basically just thugs in my view the developed world politics who use politics as a means to gain more land holdings of other internal groups who are not in power or they use it to build up animosity by pitting ruling class on the non ruling class in their lands(isku dir). All this is done because the state is basically inherited from colonial legacy is my suspicion and they haven't formed a real national identity internally and only use it externally outside its borders as everyone is more loyal to their pre existing social identity before colonialism.
They also suffer the severest form of personal, family, cronyism interests guiding their leadership with identity politics all mixed into it and lack of a rule of law with public confidence to make up their deadly cocktail of a state.
That's DR Osman view of the developed and developing world politics
Last edited:
