I am not a lawyer or expert on this area but from my observation, every social setting whether at village-regional-federal or even two people have to follow agreed and mutual law if a conflict arises or determining how they cooperate and it's rules. A society with no legal architecture is a ZOO and no different to the animal kingdom.
From what I gathered there is levels and dimension to legal architecture such as;
1. Civil/Criminal/State law architecture
2. Tribunals so people can settle matters outside court thru mediation and if unresolved goes to state run courts
3. Laws purpose is to create stability and inspired and usually effective if it consults a diverse range of sources such as religious, human rights, cultural systems, social consensus not extreme reliance on 1 source.
4. All laws are measured on their outcomes on society, if the law is active but hasn't led to good social outcomes and issues are recurring, that law has lost public confidence or fear like death penalty and is 'law in name only' but doesn't reduce the actual crime.
From what I gathered there is levels and dimension to legal architecture such as;
1. Civil/Criminal/State law architecture
2. Tribunals so people can settle matters outside court thru mediation and if unresolved goes to state run courts
3. Laws purpose is to create stability and inspired and usually effective if it consults a diverse range of sources such as religious, human rights, cultural systems, social consensus not extreme reliance on 1 source.
4. All laws are measured on their outcomes on society, if the law is active but hasn't led to good social outcomes and issues are recurring, that law has lost public confidence or fear like death penalty and is 'law in name only' but doesn't reduce the actual crime.