King of Jordan is being mocked for speaking in Arabic with a foreign accent

The alchemist

The alchemist

VIP
Arabia has a deep history. There were Saharan people that ventured into Arabia in the Neolithic, IMO, but the bulk were probably close to what you see today, a mix of Neolithic Near Eastern and Natufian types with higher Iranian-like influence on parts of the Eastern Coast. Arabians can come very dark with close to no African DNA. But African DNA existed as well for many different reasons, due to ancient migration, trade, slavery, etc., which constituted always a minority but a marked demographic that eventually assimilated into the tribal confederates that existed throughout the region.
 
T

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
Cush said:
@techsamatar This should do the trick.
Click to expand...
It seems futile, brother. The significance of Lisan Al Arab and its importance and authenticity are lost on individuals like @Step a side and @Angelina, who rely on Kafir guesswork. The Arabs of the past meticulously documented every aspect of their culture, appearance, history, and perspectives on other races. Yet, some choose to prioritize conjecture over these well-documented sources
 
Cush

Cush

Cushite Arab
techsamatar said:
It seems futile, brother. The significance of Lisan Al Arab and its importance are lost on individuals like @Step a side and @Angelina, who rely on non-believer conjecture. The Arabs of the past meticulously documented every aspect of their culture, appearance, history, and perspectives on other races. Yet, some choose to prioritize conjecture over these well-documented sources
Click to expand...
There's many other sources, I don't know if she's ignoring me out of fear or if I'm blocked
 
A

Angelina

VIP
@Step a side

I was just doing research about the Hashemite point and these are my concerns but worded in a more articulate way:

Lack of a Genetic Baseline: To accurately trace descent through DNA, there needs to be a known genetic profile or marker from the individual in question. Since Prophet Muhammad lived over 1,400 years ago, and no known genetic material from him is available, establishing a direct genetic link is not possible with current technologies and methodologies.

The lack of a genetic baseline was my initial point but I didn’t have the vocabulary for it. With Abgaals and HGs and the like, whilst there isn’t a baseline as well, the fact that those who claim to descend from Abgaal and HG and the like all tend to have the same Mutations means there is truth to it. But that can’t be said for the case of the Prophet S.A.W through the line of Hassan and Husain since many who have no genetic link claim him. Hence shifting though what’s real and what’s not is incredibly difficult.
 
Step a side

Step a side

VIP
Angelina said:
I think for Abgaal it’s different since I can Imagine the vast majority of people claiming to be Abgaal are indeed Abgaal hence a few that aren’t are simply outliers hence it’s easy to pinpoint that such a man did exist who is the patriarch of the tribe whom everyone descends from.

But with regards to the Hashemite point. It’s a bit different since you argued that a good % are indeed not a descendants. How do we know the ones that we believe are, truly are? Do you get the drift or am I not articulating myself properly?
Click to expand...
The Hashemites match verified members from other Quraishi sub tribes whom in return match verified members of other tribes that are Adnani. You have to remember Hashemites are just 1 sub out of Quraish. There are others. They are all interconnected. On top of this you have had the most well known families like Rassids and Qatadah tested. You can’t get more accurate than this. I can go Saudi Arabia today and link up with Hashemites. They are not a mystical people. Furthermore the line of Ali RA and his son Hassan or Hussein (can’t remember which one) has also been found. It’s a mutation that comes after the Hashim lineage exclusive to them.
 
Cush

Cush

Cushite Arab
@Angelina @BenInHer @techsamatar @Aurelian Over 200 E-V32 Banu Hashim resutls deleted by Kuwaiti DNA project, but even familytree knows the truth 💪 all the Hashimite chiefs are V32 along with the noble families of the Adnan tribes such as Tamim, recent top family in Qatar with V32, some famous families include the Uqaylids
1707497257040.png
 
Step a side

Step a side

VIP
Angelina said:
@Step a side

I was just doing research about the Hashemite point and these are my concerns but worded in a more articulate way:

Lack of a Genetic Baseline: To accurately trace descent through DNA, there needs to be a known genetic profile or marker from the individual in question. Since Prophet Muhammad lived over 1,400 years ago, and no known genetic material from him is available, establishing a direct genetic link is not possible with current technologies and methodologies.

The lack of a genetic baseline was my initial point but I didn’t have the vocabulary for it. With Abgaals and HGs and the like, whilst there isn’t a baseline as well, the fact that those who claim to descend from Abgaal and HG and the like all tend to have the same Mutations means there is truth to it. But that can’t be said for the case of the Prophet S.A.W through the line of Hassan and Husain since many who have no genetic link claim him. Hence shifting though what’s real and what’s not is incredibly difficult.
Click to expand...

Our beloved Nabi has not left behind any sons to carry on his lineage but thousands of Quraishi men have carried on this lineage including Ali RA. Imam Mahdi will be from his line. The family exist believe it or not. They are just not famous like the Al Saud.
 
T

techsamatar

I put Books to the Test of Life
Cush said:
@techsamatar Copy my first post tagging her to her and explain classical arabic differing from modern
Click to expand...
My friend, attempting to convey the truth from our Islamic narratives and the accounts of Arab historians to those who lack the comprehension or intelligence to grasp the depth of the historical depictions is futile. The haqq has been reiterated repeatedly through time, supported by historical evidence and descriptions, including those from Europeans detailing the invading Arabs. It is not my fault that some individuals are unable to understand the language in which their faith was revealed.

Presenting intricate scientific conjectures to individuals with a primitive, nomadic mindset often leads them to accept such ideas at face value, believing they are advancing intellectually and becoming self-sufficient.
 
Cush

Cush

Cushite Arab
techsamatar said:
My friend, attempting to convey the truth from our Islamic narratives and the accounts of Arab historians to those who lack the comprehension or intelligence to grasp the depth of the historical depictions is futile. The haqq has been reiterated repeatedly through time, supported by historical evidence and descriptions, including those from Europeans detailing the invading Arabs. It is not my fault that some individuals are unable to understand the language in which their faith was revealed.

Presenting intricate scientific conjectures to individuals with a primitive, nomadic mindset often leads them to accept such ideas at face value, believing they are advancing intellectually and becoming self-sufficient.
Click to expand...
Check your dc
 
Cush

Cush

Cushite Arab
BenInHer said:
Ya hussein ya ali ppl
:jcoleno:
Click to expand...
Correct!
And guess what?
They made a Hashemite DNA project, since they were from Tabarestan and all J1 they said we are the only real Hashemites as we are Shia
So they duplicated many results and put random flags on them to pretend to be Hashimi
But when they tested dead soldiers during the conquests they were all E-M78
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending

Latest posts

Top