BREAKING NEWS Israel attacks Iranian nuclear sites
- Thread starter Kool-Aid
- Start date
Kool-Aid
VIP
Speaking earlier to ABC News, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that he is not interested in further nuclear talks or negotiations with Iran, adding that Israel would target Iranian Supreme-Leader Ali Khamenei if need be, stating about Khamenei’s potential elimination, “Its not going to escalate the conflict, it's going to end the conflict.”
Abu Hesi
VIP
You're right, my bad, they didn't provide support to the Syrian rebels, IS and the Kurds in Iraq as a means to an end to weaken Iran and its proxies
Iron dome became iron deficiency
Abu Hesi
VIP
Iron dome became iron deficiency
good one Joore
Post from Mahmood OD | محمود عودة
🚨 Stay tuned for another intense livestream: IRGC’s most dangerous statement, new weapons and the Israeli captive pilot’s expected statement and much much mo...
youtube.com
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Does this apply to the Syrians that rebeled against the Alawites and were supported by the US and ISR?
The alchemist
VIP
Iran has too many spies in their midst. They need to purge those guys ASAP. There are many non-Muslim diasporan traitors and Jewish Iranians who have access to the country.
Skin folk are not always kinfolk (many of them are not even bound by similar ethnic identity, in spite of the Persianization that took hold under the Pahlavi regime).
Remember, nearly half of the US Iranian descendants come from the groups that came in 1979. These people were the elites who were expelled from the country. People who did not adhere to the average Iranian lifeway and were very secular and frankly Westernized, as they had allegiance to the Shah. Only 30% came after 1990. The demographic is not only non-representative to a large extent, but it is also skewed heavily, where it deviates considerably from what you witness in the Iranian region.
The view of the Iranian government is very complex, entailing that Westerners are wrong in thinking Iranians, even the ones who criticize the leadership, want an overhaul and Western domination of any kind. You have a small, shifty minority that is dangerous (technically traitors that want foreign powers to take over), still, these actors are overall not representative of the average Iranian. The political attitude of Iranians in Iran is heterogeneous whereas the majority fall within working within the system since the political order of Iran is very sophisticated, despite the West trying to frame it as a Kim Jong-un type of dictatorship.
Iran is akin to China. The West says, any day, the citizens will overthrow the government, trying to spread propaganda that wants to create reality with their words. Iran is not a perfect place; however, it is far from what they claim. There is no country that exists where the far majority of citizens want it gone without an overthrow happening. You see, the reality is, for every dictator, maybe half of the citizens of that country supported the status quo. Iran, for example, if the citizens all wanted the regime gone, it would have organically been changed. Why is it that some Western colonialist entities in the USA or where else in Europe talk about stoking flames domestically? It's because part of overthrowing governments is to inspire an idea and deception repeatedly (they send media programs by Western Iranians to plant ideas in the youth, that the grass is greener and distort image through propaganda to Iranian citzens by TV programs) until a culture conjured up by the West can spearhead chaos, as happened in Libya.
The matter of discussion about the overthrow of Omar al Bashir and Hosni Mubarak occurred after several decades, where the scale had barely tipped from one side (historic support to the other side. Reality was, for several decades up until (and even after their overthrow), those two dictators received wide support from their citizens. Before the "Arab Spring", the typical Egyptian viewed their leader in a fairly positive light (political attitudes in these countries were always historically distinct from the Western democratic perception). While others struggled and took advantage of having an outlet that potentially could usher in change. But the thing was, the average Egyptian was pretty politically non-engaged before the "Arab Spring." Omar al Bashir saw much support from a bunch of riverine Arabs. When you learn about political realities, you start to get an idea that this near-universal, negatively viewed "one-man show" dictatorism that holds a whole country hostage is actually very rare. Much of the time, regimes get support from a wide base. It was just that for both Egypt and Sudan, half of the citizens were disaffected and also angry at how the protestors were treated, which further fueled dissatisfaction. I can talk about this another time, yet let me briefly mention, the truth of the matter is, "revolutions" more often than not cause more problems than they solve.
In the West, you have a bunch of legacy from Iranians who were elites in the regime of the Shah. Today, there exist many sick monarchists, or sympathizers of the Shah, who engage in revisionism of his standing, impact, and meaning in modern Iranian history through elite imagery. The irony of this is rich given the display of the late historic royal elites that Mohammad Reza Pahlavi spearheaded showed the most disproportionate opulence, a complete dichotomy to the needs of the people, ever known to man in modern history, hosted and renovated in the ancient site of Persepolis:
If we adjust for inflation, that party cost between 121-157 million USD during a time when the majority of the Iranian citizens were struggling in poverty.
Witnessing things like that, lacking a concept of historic reality on the matter, active propagandists that are frankly in the majority in the West don't tell you that Iranians overthrew the Shah without any foreign support. It was organic, and Khomeini was received by millions on the street. It was one of the truly true revolutions of our historic period. Now you have these sick Western Iranians who cry and say the Shah was the real impression of Iran, and the revolution and its consequences were a false imposition. They flipped the reality on its head. This level of deception by individuals who aggrandize the very heart of the problem that got them kicked out in the first place highlights the contempt these psychopaths have for Iranians in Iran (the common folk that were ignored and oppressed by the secular elites) and why they are readily supporting Western/Israeli destruction of Iran. All of it is so they can come back and replay the garbage over again, trying to convince the average Iranian that their parasitic ways that undermined them in every way are on the same page, while the ruling political system is and was historically the enemy.
This incompetent Reza Pahlavi II, self-ascribed the "crown prince of Iran" (despite the Pahlavis dynasty ending in 1979), is a Zionist, and supports Western imperialism and a suppressive rival agenda and domination of the West expressed in all its violent means to be the yielding puppet that might one day get legitiized through such take-over. Funnily, the guy being representative of the worst aspect of a bygone inequality, now calling the people Israel attacked, whose ancestors kicked his people out, as "compatriots" used as "human shield" by the "regime" while sending a green light to the death and destruction Israel brings to them and the Palestinians saying Israelis are not complicit in their death causing activities. One thing I have to say about his father, at least he was not a Zionist scum and did not trust the Israelis. Also, he supports the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. This is what I have been talking about, Westernized people from the middle east or be it Africa are the worst scum imperialist that exist.
Believe it or not, the regime of Iran has more than its majority supporting it. Plus, the ones that are dissatisfied have another majority that wants to work within the system rather than overturn it. That is the truth. That is the reason why you don't see what happened in Egypt there and why imperialists want active engagement to stoke distortion rather than wait for organic change if they believe the overwhelming sentiment was on the line of overthrow. These demonstrations for the hijab are not of a serious political revolutionary zeal or cause, and they are often used by bad actors to express the normalization of Western influence. Western powers want another Libya, foreign incited demonstrations that trick the domestic citizens, to cause upheaval for them, something they would later regret when the entire country is in a fragmented turmoil, causing nothing but misery for every party.
Frankly, I have spent much time reading on the matter and know that 98% of the people who talk about Iran rarely know what they're talking about. It's always peddling the same circular stories conjured up in some media lab and foreign policy agenda by intelligence units of Western nations. Iran is not a perfect country. It has many issues, but it is a far cry from what is portrayed. And it is very context-dependent. Sometimes it is the bad actor, as seen in Iraq and Syria, other times, especially when it comes to dealings between it and the West and Israel, overwhelmingly good. Watch out for the demons that say death and destruction in Middle Eastern countries will solve issues related to conflict. All this anti-Iranian language is very tied to Israeli expansion and the need to destabilize the region further, and for Western imperialism to suppress Muslims.
Iranians in the diaspora were elites who were westernized secularists before they left, many of whom were minorities that existed in an ethno-religious and ethnically distinct (Baha'i, Jews, Armenians, and Assyrians). The level of Atheism of the diaspora does not reflect the religiosity of Iran itself. Iran is as religious as Turkey. Nearly all of them consider themselves Muslim, but not very practicing, yet they are not atheists. Many diaspora Iranians are pro-Israeli because they don't relate to actual Iranians in Iran, although they pretend to be the same. They are not.
Skin folk are not always kinfolk (many of them are not even bound by similar ethnic identity, in spite of the Persianization that took hold under the Pahlavi regime).
Remember, nearly half of the US Iranian descendants come from the groups that came in 1979. These people were the elites who were expelled from the country. People who did not adhere to the average Iranian lifeway and were very secular and frankly Westernized, as they had allegiance to the Shah. Only 30% came after 1990. The demographic is not only non-representative to a large extent, but it is also skewed heavily, where it deviates considerably from what you witness in the Iranian region.
The view of the Iranian government is very complex, entailing that Westerners are wrong in thinking Iranians, even the ones who criticize the leadership, want an overhaul and Western domination of any kind. You have a small, shifty minority that is dangerous (technically traitors that want foreign powers to take over), still, these actors are overall not representative of the average Iranian. The political attitude of Iranians in Iran is heterogeneous whereas the majority fall within working within the system since the political order of Iran is very sophisticated, despite the West trying to frame it as a Kim Jong-un type of dictatorship.
Iran is akin to China. The West says, any day, the citizens will overthrow the government, trying to spread propaganda that wants to create reality with their words. Iran is not a perfect place; however, it is far from what they claim. There is no country that exists where the far majority of citizens want it gone without an overthrow happening. You see, the reality is, for every dictator, maybe half of the citizens of that country supported the status quo. Iran, for example, if the citizens all wanted the regime gone, it would have organically been changed. Why is it that some Western colonialist entities in the USA or where else in Europe talk about stoking flames domestically? It's because part of overthrowing governments is to inspire an idea and deception repeatedly (they send media programs by Western Iranians to plant ideas in the youth, that the grass is greener and distort image through propaganda to Iranian citzens by TV programs) until a culture conjured up by the West can spearhead chaos, as happened in Libya.
The matter of discussion about the overthrow of Omar al Bashir and Hosni Mubarak occurred after several decades, where the scale had barely tipped from one side (historic support to the other side. Reality was, for several decades up until (and even after their overthrow), those two dictators received wide support from their citizens. Before the "Arab Spring", the typical Egyptian viewed their leader in a fairly positive light (political attitudes in these countries were always historically distinct from the Western democratic perception). While others struggled and took advantage of having an outlet that potentially could usher in change. But the thing was, the average Egyptian was pretty politically non-engaged before the "Arab Spring." Omar al Bashir saw much support from a bunch of riverine Arabs. When you learn about political realities, you start to get an idea that this near-universal, negatively viewed "one-man show" dictatorism that holds a whole country hostage is actually very rare. Much of the time, regimes get support from a wide base. It was just that for both Egypt and Sudan, half of the citizens were disaffected and also angry at how the protestors were treated, which further fueled dissatisfaction. I can talk about this another time, yet let me briefly mention, the truth of the matter is, "revolutions" more often than not cause more problems than they solve.
In the West, you have a bunch of legacy from Iranians who were elites in the regime of the Shah. Today, there exist many sick monarchists, or sympathizers of the Shah, who engage in revisionism of his standing, impact, and meaning in modern Iranian history through elite imagery. The irony of this is rich given the display of the late historic royal elites that Mohammad Reza Pahlavi spearheaded showed the most disproportionate opulence, a complete dichotomy to the needs of the people, ever known to man in modern history, hosted and renovated in the ancient site of Persepolis:
If we adjust for inflation, that party cost between 121-157 million USD during a time when the majority of the Iranian citizens were struggling in poverty.
Witnessing things like that, lacking a concept of historic reality on the matter, active propagandists that are frankly in the majority in the West don't tell you that Iranians overthrew the Shah without any foreign support. It was organic, and Khomeini was received by millions on the street. It was one of the truly true revolutions of our historic period. Now you have these sick Western Iranians who cry and say the Shah was the real impression of Iran, and the revolution and its consequences were a false imposition. They flipped the reality on its head. This level of deception by individuals who aggrandize the very heart of the problem that got them kicked out in the first place highlights the contempt these psychopaths have for Iranians in Iran (the common folk that were ignored and oppressed by the secular elites) and why they are readily supporting Western/Israeli destruction of Iran. All of it is so they can come back and replay the garbage over again, trying to convince the average Iranian that their parasitic ways that undermined them in every way are on the same page, while the ruling political system is and was historically the enemy.
This incompetent Reza Pahlavi II, self-ascribed the "crown prince of Iran" (despite the Pahlavis dynasty ending in 1979), is a Zionist, and supports Western imperialism and a suppressive rival agenda and domination of the West expressed in all its violent means to be the yielding puppet that might one day get legitiized through such take-over. Funnily, the guy being representative of the worst aspect of a bygone inequality, now calling the people Israel attacked, whose ancestors kicked his people out, as "compatriots" used as "human shield" by the "regime" while sending a green light to the death and destruction Israel brings to them and the Palestinians saying Israelis are not complicit in their death causing activities. One thing I have to say about his father, at least he was not a Zionist scum and did not trust the Israelis. Also, he supports the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. This is what I have been talking about, Westernized people from the middle east or be it Africa are the worst scum imperialist that exist.
Believe it or not, the regime of Iran has more than its majority supporting it. Plus, the ones that are dissatisfied have another majority that wants to work within the system rather than overturn it. That is the truth. That is the reason why you don't see what happened in Egypt there and why imperialists want active engagement to stoke distortion rather than wait for organic change if they believe the overwhelming sentiment was on the line of overthrow. These demonstrations for the hijab are not of a serious political revolutionary zeal or cause, and they are often used by bad actors to express the normalization of Western influence. Western powers want another Libya, foreign incited demonstrations that trick the domestic citizens, to cause upheaval for them, something they would later regret when the entire country is in a fragmented turmoil, causing nothing but misery for every party.
Frankly, I have spent much time reading on the matter and know that 98% of the people who talk about Iran rarely know what they're talking about. It's always peddling the same circular stories conjured up in some media lab and foreign policy agenda by intelligence units of Western nations. Iran is not a perfect country. It has many issues, but it is a far cry from what is portrayed. And it is very context-dependent. Sometimes it is the bad actor, as seen in Iraq and Syria, other times, especially when it comes to dealings between it and the West and Israel, overwhelmingly good. Watch out for the demons that say death and destruction in Middle Eastern countries will solve issues related to conflict. All this anti-Iranian language is very tied to Israeli expansion and the need to destabilize the region further, and for Western imperialism to suppress Muslims.
What about shia in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain do they have representations
what about xoriyaasha puntland do they have representations 
America produces about 1,000 to 2,000 tamir missiles a year, safe to say Israel wouldn't be able to produce 1/10 of that.Iron dome became iron deficiency
Who is saying they're not marginalizedWhat about shia in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain do they have representations
Israel Claims Control of Tehran Airspace /Lt Col Daniel Davis
Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy storehttps://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav
www.youtube.com
Kool-Aid
VIP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke earlier during a press conference about the possibility of overthrowing the government in Iran, “The overthrow of the Iranian regime - it could be consequential, because this regime is weak; we can certainly see that there will be huge changes in Iran. I release videos for the Iranian people, millions watch it, they are full of hope and understand that the regime is much weaker - and this could bring results. No one predicted the fall of the Soviet Union and few predicted the fall of Bashar al-Assad.”
What about African American representation Donald trump administrationWho is saying they're not marginalized
We was Iranian awooweWho is saying they're not marginalized
The ancestral haplogroup HV0 is believed to have originated in the region of Western Iran
Bashar al Assad falling opened up Syria to Israel invasion . It also emboldened them to invade Iran, its crazy domino effect. Turkey played apart in all this chaos and now they are nervous and scared of Israel. Same can be said of Iran and not building good relations with Sunni countries. All that infighting now you got Iran using back channels begging for help to Sunni countries
Last edited:
