Theyโre saying imam Ahmed without the ottoman support was weak ?
@โ๐ซ๐ฑ๐ข๐ฏ๐ซ๐ข๐ฑ ๐๐ฌ๐ช๐๐ก
You can't have this pfp and not be an underneath-the-foot kind of person:View attachment 270459
Yes. That is my argument. Waste your time debating those lying Habash and you will be the default loser - for not respecting yourself, that is. kk. They throw everything on the wall to watch what sticks because they are a hateful bunch.
Iโm confused on the adal and gaalo empire war so I donโt know the history enough however all these people give credit to ottoman and not adalYou can't have this pfp and not be an underneath-the-foot kind of person:View attachment 270459
Yes. That is my argument. Waste your time debating those lying Habash and you will be the default loser - for not respecting yourself, that is. kk. They throw everything on the wall to watch what sticks because they are a hateful bunch.
Its cope because they definitely were actually saved by the Portuguese when adal handled things themselves for the most part. The ottomans sent troops for reinforcements following the imam's lead but he was already winning at that point. The Portuguese on the other hand came and lead the Ethiopians and still lost. The only reason Ethiopia didn't collapse is because the Portuguese stranglers ran away into the Highlands and made guns and trained Ethiopian gun men and then they surprise attacked the imam when he was basically off season and didn't have his main army with him.Iโm confused on the adal and gaalo empire war so I donโt know the history enough however all these people give credit to ottoman and not adal
Iโve heard some say
Yeah there is some incorrect info and bias from Portuguese sources but it sums up what I said regardless. You can see for yourselfIโve heard some say
That channel gave too much credit to ottoman and not adal so i ignored it