What do you disagree, or do not like about it? Try reading it at first, and spare a thought for the nation's recent history.
It all sounds good on paper, just like how youve been presenting it, but in practice...
And this is what I find funny, you tell me to spare a thought for the nations recent history. Thats why I'm saying this lol. Youve got sland vying for independance, you have pland and now this new random movement of pland first. Even right now as we speak we have the rising conflict in jland.
These states are too big and pose a challenge to literally everything positive, may it be economically, politically militarily. Since the ICU there has been no positive development done by the state, Things done by time and private entities don't count.
This isnt how federalism is suppose to be anyways, I would be for federalism if it was a much stronger central government. You guys are trying to cry about centralism bcs of some clauses being created in the constitution which gives the national government power. Literally in every federalist country it is like that.
When some of you hear centralism, its like you all thing everything is going to be dictated from the capital and the regional areas wont get any say no no. That is not the correct system and literally no centralist countries can pull that off, maybe the smaller ones. Regional government still have their own power, but obviously not as much as the ones we have today where they can form their own military and denounce the government. No country you will find that.
Federalism, especially the way its set up now will only lead to failure. It will just be infused with qabil every single time, unless if states are broken up into 3-5. This of course would require a strong central leader with a strong support base thats beyond qabil. Which will happen with the bitter qabilist finish their lives knowing they contributed into destroying this country but at least in their tuulo they were the most landheere