They fought against Bashar Alassad, Russia, Hizbulla, Iranian/Afghani/Pakestani militias, ISIS, Alqaeda. These people will continue to fight for a long time.Didn't know that they still existed anyway they're a lost cause even their allies have given up on them
Hezbolshaytan claims these men were paid a trillion dollars to fight against Assad.They are using cans as artillery
Hezbolla once said the path to Alquds goes through Aleppo, they committed atrocities there.Hezbolshaytan claims these men were paid a trillion dollars to fight against Assad.
??Civil wars are invariably counter-productive and should never be embarked upon; organic and gradual reforms work better in the long run
??
Are you saying that the uprising in 2011 in Syria was wrong?
We can say the same about the uprising done by South Sudanese and the eventual establishment of South Sudan by the WestThe proof is in the pudding, no?
Look at the fall-out from that "uprising"; the amount of death, destruction and displacement is inconceivable.
The fault lays on Assad's regime, no one told him to fire on the unarmed civilians. Beside, there is no gradual reforms don't work in Syria. I laughed and stunned by that.The proof is in the pudding, no?
Look at the fall-out from that "uprising"; the amount of death, destruction and displacement is inconceivable.
We can say the same about the uprising done by madow Sudanese and the eventual establishment of South Sudan by the West
The fault lays on Assad's regime, no one told him to fire on the unarmed civilians. Beside, there is no gradual reforms don't work in Syria. I laughed and stunned by that.
But, for what exactly? They were assembled and funded by the CIA through the gulf states to overthrow Assad and limit Russia’s influence in the region. There’s no organic or grassroots freedom movement here. A bunch of useful idiots with dreams of setting up a perverse “islamic” state.They fought against Bashar Alassad, Russia, Hizbulla, Iranian/Afghani/Pakestani militias, ISIS, Alqaeda. These people will continue to fight for a long time.
Good point. Imagine calling CIA plants “freedom fighters” and cheering on the destruction of a country. These people are sick.Syria used to be a good place, the most underrated place you could travel to. Ask any Somali who has lived there. It was the calmest place before the war, containing a peaceful and pleasant population like Omanis, but with higher historical centrality for Muslims, an area with a rich history. No one anticipated Damascus would be a rubble a few years before the war. It shows how anyone can fall and that the worst doesn't necessarily fall first.
Then again, throughout history, the sacking and destruction of empires happened many times over. We in this day and age have extremely short-term thinking, viewing the immediate as the end and be-all because of its direct relevance to our lives. The truth could be that the people destroyed today might reach their zenith in the future. In a short time, inshallah.
I doubt you're Muslim if you believe an Islamic state is perverse, but worshipping a dictator isn't it.But, for what exactly? They were assembled and funded by the CIA through the gulf states to overthrow Assad and limit Russia’s influence in the region. There’s no organic or grassroots freedom movement here. A bunch of useful idiots with dreams of setting up a perverse “islamic” state.
Russia and Assad bombed most of Syria, you moron. Aleppo was destroyed by indiscriminate Russian bombardment the reason why Israel has free rein to bomb Syria whenever it wants without any consequences is because of its ally Russia.Good point. Imagine calling CIA plants “freedom fighters” and cheering on the destruction of a country. These people are sick.
The bombing started when the so-called rebels started to execute the CIA plan. Bashar had a right to fight back against the CIA and their puppets and has won in the end. As for Russia, the CIA plan was to reduce their influence in the region, and naturally they are against that. They’re supporting their ally.I doubt you're Muslim if you believe an Islamic state is perverse, but worshipping a dictator isn't it.
Russia and Assad bombed most of Syria, you moron. Aleppo was destroyed by indiscriminate Russian bombardment the reason why Israel has free rein to bomb Syria whenever it wants without any consequences is because of its ally Russia.View attachment 308367View attachment 308368
so they destroyed most of Syria and butchered it's people, but it's the CIA's fault that happened? What's your excuse for Russia and Israel working together to kill Muslims in Darfur currently?The bombing started when the so-called rebels started to execute the CIA plan. Bashar had a right to fight back against the CIA and their puppets and has won in the end. As for Russia, the CIA plan was to reduce their influence in the region, and naturally they are against that. They’re supporting their ally.
Assad freed the jihadists himself.Before the CIA sent the jihadists in, Syria was extremely tolerant and a nice place to be. There were no attempts to go after sunnis. The CIA invented problems to get rid of Syria.
so when Assad soldiers torture youngsters and force them to say "Assad is god", you don't think that's enough oppose that kind of regime?I’m not Muslim for being against ISIS? In Somalia we’re currently killing people with the shahada on their flag who claim they want to establish an Islamic state, also known as Al Shabaab. I guess the people fighting this group’s ambition are not Muslim. Get the f*ck out of here.
Assad himself has never declared himself to be god. He never came close to it. These are nitpicked clips from the internet.so they destroyed most of Syria and butchered it's people, but it's the CIA's fault that happened? What's your excuse for Russia and Israel working together to kill Muslims in Darfur currently?
Assad freed the jihadists himself.
when it became obvious most of the rebels were Islamist, the US abandoned supporting them.
so when Assad soldiers torture youngsters and force them to say "Assad is god", you don't think that's enough oppose that kind of regime?