Im Pro Capitalist Anti Charity

[DR OSMAN]

I lean towards the left on most topics except 'economics'. The left promote charity and social care, I support that only for disabled and elderly only not 'universal' coverage. I also believe capitalists storing their money in banks and lending to poor people to start businesses and create employment is the best model to economic development. The benefits of loans n banking outweighs any negative it poses. Our ppl will not develop wealth and cure poverty if they don't have a loaning system in place.

I say we should ban charity to able bodied people, your not helping them, your hurting them in more ways then u can observe. They will forever be dependent and lining up for charity becuz charity isn't a cure to poverty, infact it pro-longs poverty.

I want Puntites to get rid of these sheikhs and mosques who are responsible for this horrible economic approach of simply keeping people dependent on charity and replace them with diaspora n foreign capitalists to store capital in our bank and the govt should encourage locals to get loans to start up businesses and if their employed to purchase properties, vehicles, and other hard assets they can pass onto the next generation.

There is lack of generational wealth in PL, and the problem is the previous generation spent their life on charity and this leads to the next generation doing the same. So an economic re-direction is needed to get out of this cycle.

Their will be no economic progress or freedom or development if PL continues on this path of charity. When I see hundreds lining up for charity, I imagine if only those ppl all lined up for loans they would be economically free and own something in the end rather then coming back each year lining up for a hand out.

 

[DR OSMAN]

The area I agree with the left is providing strong laws for workers so they are not treated like this by capitalists.

That's where a govt that cares for it's ppl will negiotate with capialists on what they demand for it's labourers financially. True Ribbah in my eyes is when u have rich ppl abusing poor ppl financially, not bank loans as that's mutually beneficial for all sides, wats the other option? line up for rice bags n salid, hell that's even a worse outcome.

 

[DR OSMAN]

China is a perfect example, their culture doesn't encourage charity nor do u ever see a chinese charity, they are now one of the most industrious ppl who with a loan can turn that into wealth immediately. Where-ever charity is encourged or implemented, those societies are always at the bottom of the world economy.

 

[DR OSMAN]

I am also pro affordable housing. Land plots should be sold based on workers income not market rate. The market rate may not be in-line with the true income of a local and they can't achieve the dream of owning a home.

This where govt needs to 'zone' out a big land area and demand developers only sell land n house packages adjusted to local incomes. This is best for all ppl, becuz ppl will have a reason to work, it's better for govt n developers to utilize the land then nobody using it besidese diaspora who have hard currency. U can't limit our economy to diaspora only, our GDP won't grow. GDP will grow thru the 'majority' borrowing/buying/spending. Banks grow thru borrowing, market grows thru buying n spending from locals. That's the way GDP changes.

 

[Nikka]

There are people that need Charity though. Capitalism and charity aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[bidenkulaha]

There’s a false economy that right wing economics creates. Such as an unhealthy population as not everyone has access to quality healthcare, or early education so you have a bunch of stupid citizens. This leads to weak productivity. Solve the health and education in a social democratic way and leave the rest to an agile private sector

 

[DR OSMAN]

@bidenkulaha capitalism requires 'capital' and 'capital' is stored in banks, this is the engine of developed economies where locals can seek capital and buy properties, vehicles, and even convert their ideas into start-ups. This model spreads wealth out to the local, this is the best model of market development.

FDI is foreign owned and isn't included in your nation's GDP calculation but is calculated for the originating country GDP, most important positions in FDI are sourced out to the originating country.

As for charity this simply prolongs poverty over generations, and this model is RIFE in Somalia.

PL and Somalia as a whole needs to craft banking laws immediately. Banking is the engin to put money into local hands, we shouldn't worry about the existing business community as they have capital, the question is how to spread it out to locals and grow the business community, how to grow buying/spending in the market so business sell more. We have an idle peasantry not doing anything and this is the most critical part of an economy.

 

[J-Z]

I lean towards the left on most topics except 'economics'. The left promote charity and social care, I support that only for disabled and elderly only not 'universal' coverage. I also believe capitalists storing their money in banks and lending to poor people to start businesses and create employment is the best model to economic development. The benefits of loans n banking outweighs any negative it poses. Our ppl will not develop wealth and cure poverty if they don't have a loaning system in place.

I say we should ban charity to able bodied people, your not helping them, your hurting them in more ways then u can observe. They will forever be dependent and lining up for charity becuz charity isn't a cure to poverty, infact it pro-longs poverty.

I want Puntites to get rid of these sheikhs and mosques who are responsible for this horrible economic approach of simply keeping people dependent on charity and replace them with diaspora n foreign capitalists to store capital in our bank and the govt should encourage locals to get loans to start up businesses and if their employed to purchase properties, vehicles, and other hard assets they can pass onto the next generation.

There is lack of generational wealth in PL, and the problem is the previous generation spent their life on charity and this leads to the next generation doing the same. So an economic re-direction is needed to get out of this cycle.

Their will be no economic progress or freedom or development if PL continues on this path of charity. When I see hundreds lining up for charity, I imagine if only those ppl all lined up for loans they would be economically free and own something in the end rather then coming back each year lining up for a hand out.

DR sxb Capitalism is an economic system but charity is a social system.
From my point of view, the Scandinavian countries have implemented the best capital system in the world, despite their extremism in the secular system, which negatively affected the social structure of the Scandinavian family in the long run.