What the f*ck did us Sufis do to you???Makes me happy to see one small group of righteous Muslims take on a belligerent mob of
-Sufis
-Shia
-liberals
-feminazis
-triggered Westerners
-all sorts of deviants
What the f*ck did us Sufis do to you???
You wahabbis from hell and your demonic leader are sick in the head. Bisinka that man was one step away from saying some shit that would’ve made him his own religion, like the bahais
Aight then I’m gonna call wahhabis, lahhabis from now on. Y’all and your father from hell mr. Lahab can agree with “lahhabis”?You do realize that the name Wahhaab means God, and by calling someone a "wahabbi" in a negative context you're insulting Allah? The absolute state of muslims today.
Aight then I’m gonna call wahhabis, lahhabis from now on. Y’all and your father from hell mr. Lahab can agree with “lahhabis”?
Bro are you serious? Are you actually serious? This nutjob massacred thousands of Muslims? Not to mention this lunatic thought he was the sole person who knew the religion out of everyone during his time.What is wrong with Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab?
What is wrong with Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab?
(Shafi Mufti in Mecca, Sheikh Ahmad Zayni Dahlan (d. 1304 H.) says in his book ‘umara’ al-balad al-haram."The followers of M. Ibn Abdul Wahhab believed that they were Muslims and that whoever opposed them were idol worshippers. By doing this, they declared the killing of the scholars and laymen of Muslim Orthodoxy as permissible.”
The Maliki Sheikh Ahmad as-Sawi (d. 1241 H.) mentioned in his commentary on al-Jalalayn [vol.3 p.307-308]”When the Wahhabis entered at-Ta’if they killed the people en mass including the elderly and the children, the honourables, the princes and the layman. They even slaughtered the suckling infants by their mothers’ breasts. They also assaulted the pilgrims to Mecca through extortion and murder.''
Maliki scholar, Imam Ahmad as-Sawi continues -”They are a sect in the Hijaz region (East Arabia) who are called the Wahhabis, they think they have a legitimate authority but indeed they are the liars who have been deceived by the devil who has made them forget the remembrance of their Lord. Those are the evil satanic sect; in fact the sect of Satan is defeated.
Hanbali Qadi, Sulaiman ibn Suhaim [d. 1773] says -"The Khawarij corrupted the meaning of the Book and the Sunnah. This can be witnessed now in a cult that appeared in Al-Hijaz by the name of the Wahhabis. They think they are upon something, but they are only liars."
Imam Anwar Shah al-Kashmiri says in his commentary on Sahih al-Bukhari, ‘Faydh al-Bari ‘ala Sahih al-Bukhari’, 1/171:”Whoever does not agree with him [Ibn Adul Wahhab], then he judges them with having committed major kufr... So in reality he is calling to the Tawhid of himself rather than to the Tawhid of Allah."
''As for Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, then indeed he was an idiotic man of little knowledge, thus he would be hasty in making takfir. Diving into this river (of takfir) is not appropriate except for the one who is cautious upon, proficient in, and well-acquainted with the existence of disbelief and it’s causes.''
Hanbali scholar, Ibn Humaid [d. 1878] BIOGRAPHIC work on Hanbali scholars, p.680 says:”The Wahhabis oppose Muslim Orthodoxy and the madhabs while leading the Ummah astray, declaring the blood and wealth of MUSLIMS halal for spilling and seizure. This group took filthy, dark doubts & used them to surround people.”
Hanbali scholar Mustafa ash Shatti in his book An-Nuqul ash-Shariyyah fir-Radd Al al-Wahhabiyyah (The Divine Texts in Answering Muhammad ibn `Abdul Wahhab and his followers).”If [MIAW] was unable to kill openly, he would send someone to assassinate him in their bed or in the marketplace at night, since he judged whoever contradicted him with takfir and legalised their killing.”
Hanbali Imam Mustafa ash-Shatti continues in his book -“There is nothing in these Wahhabi principles except manifest darkness, immense warring and tribulation. It is the creed of the people of Harura (Khawarij) being propounded as well as the devises of Satan being used.”
"[A] tiny cult that emerged out of Najd. They limit themselves to the Book and Sunnah while they neither understand it in its forms defined previously, nor do any of them know the basic fundamental aspects of knowledge."
“Every Imam is required to push people away from this astray innovator [Ibn Abdul Wahhab]. The ummah has documented the madhabs in the best way. What does this ignorant fool know about the Book & the Sunnah?!”
(Shafi Mufti in Mecca, Sheikh Ahmad Zayni Dahlan (d. 1304 H.) says in his book ‘umara’ al-balad al-haram.
The Maliki Sheikh Ahmad as-Sawi (d. 1241 H.) mentioned in his commentary on al-Jalalayn [vol.3 p.307-308]
Maliki scholar, Imam Ahmad as-Sawi continues -
Hanbali Qadi, Sulaiman ibn Suhaim [d. 1773] says -
Imam Anwar Shah al-Kashmiri says in his commentary on Sahih al-Bukhari, ‘Faydh al-Bari ‘ala Sahih al-Bukhari’, 1/171:
- Hanbali, Dawud ibn Sulaiman Al-Khalidi [d.1881\ says -
Hanbali scholar, Ibn Humaid [d. 1878] BIOGRAPHIC work on Hanbali scholars, p.680 says:
Hanbali scholar Mustafa ash Shatti in his book An-Nuqul ash-Shariyyah fir-Radd Al al-Wahhabiyyah (The Divine Texts in Answering Muhammad ibn `Abdul Wahhab and his followers).
Hanbali Imam Mustafa ash-Shatti continues in his book -
- Hanbali Scholar Muhammad as-Saffarini d.1775 says-
Intriguing, most scholars I've listened to/read always had a romanticized view of him. Good post akhi.