I used to think timojileec hate is forced

[repo]

Lots of leftists had their brains broken by seeing a jatt from a two hut village in Uttar Pradash posting thumbs up under a picture of a dead Palestinian child. They’re not defending them from the far right anymore which means they’re easy targets.

That's a good point, full sappart saar.

 

[Lovelypriestess]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Exactly. These Indian hindu immigrants in the west are some of the biggest anti immigration supporters when it comes to islamic immigrants/muslims. It's funny because the only reason why these cadaans and others didn't turn on them was because most of them are richer and educated because of the selective immigration criteria and are mostly concentrated in tech/business/finance.

And even then, many non Indians workers hated working with them because of nepotism (h1b), racism, classism and just lots of rude behaviours. This was before the whole h1b debate went mainstream. Lots of STEM workers were already complaining but since most people don't work in those fields and thus do not have lots of contact with them outside of the big cities where most of them live, it was not that big of a deal.

Now that lots of these newer immigrants are basically less educated and poorer than the Indians before and the Indian population across the whole west (Europe, Australia, US, Canada, New Zealand) are all growing and they are becoming the biggest immigrant groups in those countries, the hate has been focused on them and frankly they deserve some of it like the rude behaviours, nepotism and caste system shit that they bring (first hand experience).

Notice how almost nobody cares for the anti Indian hate? You don't see other groups like blacks/east Asians/arabs/hispanics caring for them and why should we/they? They didn't care for us either when it was our turn. They are the biggest white wannabes hence why they succeeded compared to east Asians. They basically took the place of Jews and did so happily. It sucks for the normal ones which is the majority just like all other groups but this is their battle to fight.

 

[MaliMohamed]

Glass house type thread

 

[peterpeter]

anyone that lives near them knows its about time

 

[ForwardSweep]

Ain't no way those dudes is named is Xaarshit.

 

[The alchemist]

Lol high trust society in 2025 amongst many western countries is a facade. It doesn’t really exist when nobody really challenges corporate overlords and corrupt politicians from robbing their civilians.

Westerners are interpersonally low-trust. That is why they outsourced everything to leverage institutions to make sure people don't take advantage of each other. A bunch of cadaans could not have been part of the Somali circulatory lender system (ayuuto) without a bank guarantee, while Somalis have high enough trust so that this is not needed. People have to stop just peddling what racist whites say. Whites here are way more skeptical of each other, more so than a Somali is of another. They trust way less, and that is why they created 3rd party systems so they don't have to trust; the consequences of low trust behavior are what guides behavior.

Japan is a high-trust country. But they trust everyone to conform because of collectivist social pressures, and there is extreme shame and ostracism in doing low-trust behavior. It's hammered into them. Somalis are very high-trust, actually. High trust does not mean things are going to go perfectly.

What "high trust" means is homogeneity of whites and having moral qualities. They're basically saying that immigrants have low trust because they are somewhat innately lower in ethical integrity and will not understand or participate in a similar social contract.

This stuff was peddled by global liberal culturalists with strong racialist connotations, which liberalism has been about. Liberalism was never universal; there has always been a strong racial aspect to it. Liberalism, in its practical effect, according to Charles W. Mills, had an implicit social contract theory where "whites" were on top, and this so-called enlightenment "universal values" and enjoyment of goods, exploited or otherwise, applied to them only. A nascent form of this found root in the "Age of Exploration" when Europeans went to lands already inhabited, disregarded the humanity and sovereignty of the natives, and then pretended they moved into unexplored territory. Such foundations set the stage for the very contradictions witnessed with the universalism under "social contract" by liberals later, that was, in reality, a not-so-universal, exclusive racial theory.

A good reflection of that is how international law is stressed when Westerners are wronged, but they constantly do things to impede the integrity of countries in the global south. For example, when they killed people in embassies in Lebanon. These things have a Western asterisk to them. Genocide is done in Palestine, people mention a list of breaches in international law that should garner consequences; however, to them, it means little because Palestinians are not Western. There is no universal international law. They constantly break rules, disrespecting other countries' sovereignty. But that is not symmetrical since it is about how the social contract of international law is not equal for non-Westerners. It's like how the "founding fathers" of America talked about these human values about freedom, dignity, and morality, but were slave holding elites. That is why racists like to peddle these liberal ideas because they strongly intuit the racialist realities behind them despite being presented as a lofty liberal way. For that reason, it is no coincidence that the person behind the tweet is a racist who propagates ideas of "white" exclusionary dominion and ownership of America.

This is not to obfuscate problems with Indian immigration. Although I see problems with how people are more comfortable with racism because of the Indian migration topic, which is a double-edged sword for other immigrants. It allows the dominant group to be comfortable being openly racist and aggressive towards immigrants as a whole. That pendulum can quickly swing toward another group using the same momentum.

 

[Misil]

Westerners are interpersonally low-trust. That is why they outsourced everything to leverage institutions to make sure people don't take advantage of each other. A bunch of cadaans could not have been part of the Somali circulatory lender system (ayuuto) without a bank guarantee, while Somalis have high enough trust so that this is not needed. People have to stop just peddling what racist whites say. Whites here are way more skeptical of each other, more so than a Somali is of another. They trust way less, and that is why they created 3rd party systems so they don't have to trust; the consequences of low trust behavior are what guides behavior.

Japan is a high-trust country. But they trust everyone to conform because of collectivist social pressures, and there is extreme shame and ostracism in doing low-trust behavior. It's hammered into them. Somalis are very high-trust, actually. High trust does not mean things are going to go perfectly.

What "high trust" means is homogeneity of whites and having moral qualities. They're basically saying that immigrants have low trust because they are somewhat innately lower in ethical integrity and will not understand or participate in a similar social contract.

This stuff was peddled by global liberal culturalists with strong racialist connotations, which liberalism has been about. Liberalism was never universal; there has always been a strong racial aspect to it. Liberalism, in its practical effect, according to Charles W. Mills, had an implicit social contract theory where "whites" were on top, and this so-called enlightenment "universal values" and enjoyment of goods, exploited or otherwise, applied to them only. A nascent form of this found root in the "Age of Exploration" when Europeans went to lands already inhabited, disregarded the humanity and sovereignty of the natives, and then pretended they moved into unexplored territory. Such foundations set the stage for the very contradictions witnessed with the universalism under "social contract" by liberals later, that was, in reality, a not-so-universal, exclusive racial theory.

A good reflection of that is how international law is stressed when Westerners are wronged, but they constantly do things to impede the integrity of countries in the global south. For example, when they killed people in embassies in Lebanon. These things have a Western asterisk to them. Genocide is done in Palestine, people mention a list of breaches in international law that should garner consequences; however, to them, it means little because Palestinians are not Western. There is no universal international law. They constantly break rules, disrespecting other countries' sovereignty. But that is not symmetrical since it is about how the social contract of international law is not equal for non-Westerners. It's like how the "founding fathers" of America talked about these human values about freedom, dignity, and morality, but were slave holding elites. That is why racists like to peddle these liberal ideas because they strongly intuit the racialist realities behind them despite being presented as a lofty liberal way. For that reason, it is no coincidence that the person behind the tweet is a racist who propagates ideas of "white" exclusionary dominion and ownership of America.

This is not to obfuscate problems with Indian immigration. Although I see problems with how people are more comfortable with racism because of the Indian migration topic, which is a double-edged sword for other immigrants. It allows the dominant group to be comfortable being openly racist and aggressive towards immigrants as a whole. That pendulum can quickly swing toward another group using the same momentum.

This “high trust” rubbish has lately been pushed into the mainstream of rightwing thought by ppl like Joseph Henrich. His book Weirdest People is full of questionable evolutionary psychology jargon. What a lot of cadaan racialists don’t want to accept is that many of their ”unique” cultural traits that apparently go back thousands of years are in fact much more recent changes brought about by prosperity and aging populations/low birth rates. These two factors can explain a good deal of social phenomena that others like to explain in racial terms

 

[Lightshow]

Gujarat Indians > Punjabi Indians

Not sure about that one.