I genuinely see not much of a point in reading his earlier works, most of the time it's just logical tangents being pulled out of his ass.
Like for example in lysis how does he develop his like to like theory? How does he determine when a said definition of virtue (friendship, courage, etc.) Is impossible to define?
Like for example in lysis how does he develop his like to like theory? How does he determine when a said definition of virtue (friendship, courage, etc.) Is impossible to define?