HUGE BREAKING NEWS! Minneapolis & State Leaders Are Reportedly Preparing For Potential Derek Chauvin Pardon!

This has been going on for decades since Rodney king in fact its the same cycle someone records a cop beating a black man ,indeed city blacks who are outraged start rioting , white liberal suburban parents who start crying “BLM were allies of the black community 😤” Then everyone forgets until another incident happens


What I find to be so funny is those white liberal suburban parents support zoning laws that keep there property values high so they can keep minorities out of there area I have found that California and Canada are the best examples of this phenomenon


Property taxes are how schools get there money in America if you live in the inerr city you go to a school that looks like this

View attachment 361140

If you live in the white View attachment 361141suburbs you go to a school that looks like this
Yes, the accumulative tax environment in America generally dictates the qualitative societal upbringing and material facilitations on a system based level that indeed makes kids less likely to succeed and less often stumble in inner city urban environments.

"Nice" liberals are racist in ways that is more indirect but cary and maintain a strong social and economic in-group/out-group stratificstion as the buffoons on the right that think that white people not being to say the n-word without consequence means white people are oppressed. Only the latter say the in-group/out-group emphasis is because of culture.
 

The truth seeker

Too young , too simple , and sometimes too naive
VIP
Yes, the accumulative tax environment in America generally dictates the qualitative societal upbringing and material facilitations on a system based level that indeed makes kids less likely to succeed and less often stumble in inner city urban environments.

"Nice" liberals are racist in ways that is more indirect but cary and maintain a strong social and economic in-group/out-group stratificstion as the buffoons on the right that think that white people not being to say the n-word without consequence means white people are oppressed. Only the latter say the in-group/out-group emphasis is because of culture.
White liberals are best described as “I love diversity just not in my neighborhood ”

Democrats just grift to blacks they know they cant lose suburban whites who have to be at least 80-100 million strong although this demographic has become purple since whites are shifting right
 

Gacmeey

Madaxweynaha Qurbo Joogta 🇸🇴
You missed the whole point there. Chauvin was part of a trend of police brutality against Black men and people had enough of it, and the trend was racially loaded in the actions and the response by the law enforcement, the legal systems and the sentiment of many of the white public. Are you going to deny that or be obtuse about it?
Okay, how was Floyd targeted? The police was called on him by the store owner. Floyd resisted arrest and got aggressive, they put him in the car and he yelled I can’t breath, they took him out and put him on the ground and placed a knee on his neck. Where is the race issue here? Was Floyd targeted for his race making him “part of a trend of police brutality against black men” or was this police brutality against a citizen? Was his association with a particular identity group the reason for his mistreatment? I don’t think it’s justified for anyone to make this case a race issue if they cannot prove that race was a factor. There are much better examples of police specifically targeting black men but this is just a extremely weak one with questionable basis.

Chauvin was on trial for what he did. Expert opinion came through and the evidence showed he was guilty. Ben Shapiro claims it was the notion of racial tension alone that had set bias into the trial, and the guy is innocent. He also uses George Floyd case as an example of how Black men are not disproportionately targeted by police in foul play cases. He is wrong and foul and that is why you saying he is right is wrong.
I’m not making that argument tho. Just because he says something correct for a bad purpose doesn’t make my repetition of that same correct statement wrong. Derek committed murder, Derek was not racist, Derek’s trial was done because of racial tension, there was evidence of jury intimidation, the verdict was the correct one. All those things are true at the same time
 
White liberals are best described as “I love diversity just not in my neighborhood ”

Democrats just grift to blacks they know they cant lose suburban whites who have to be at least 80-100 million strong although this demographic has become purple since whites are shifting right
These liberal types outwardly say racist commentary often, yet then get away with it somehow. I have met many of them, saying the most ignorant garbage, still, they want you around. And they love you and hate you at the same time if you're cooler and more accomplished; however, they would show you utter contempt if you were inferior in their eyes. They want to be around you, but don't think for a second they see you as a true friend. I am glad I had real homies from day one, but imagine being surrounded by these scummy types that would throw you under the bus quick when it benefited them.

One thing with those folks, always express your excellence around them and make them benefit you. Don't let your guard down because they're sheep in wolf clothing. And I mean these people are liberal in a general sense, people that are centrist all the way to the weak leftists. Socially left, supporting all types of deviance like typical liberals but they could have economic views that are typical of the centrist and right wing Americans. Scandinavians are different from Americans in that regard because 90% are within the liberal value chain. Almost everyone supports socially left values. The right here are nothing more than center-left people in America, the epitome of liberals.

My white friends that I had since elementary would probably be weak liberals if one had to hold them to things but the ones I am talking to are the elitist-minded liberals, the typical kind. Not every white person is political or displays all the traits.
 
Okay, how was Floyd targeted? The police was called on him by the store owner. Floyd resisted arrest and got aggressive, they put him in the car and he yelled I can’t breath, they took him out and put him on the ground and placed a knee on his neck. Where is the race issue here? Was Floyd targeted for his race making him “part of a trend of police brutality against black men” or was this police brutality against a citizen? Was his association with a particular identity group the reason for his mistreatment? I don’t think it’s justified for anyone to make this case a race issue if they cannot prove that race was a factor. There are much better examples of police specifically targeting black men but this is just a extremely weak one with questionable basis.


I’m not making that argument tho. Just because he says something correct for a bad purpose doesn’t make my repetition of that same correct statement wrong. Derek committed murder, Derek was not racist, Derek’s trial was done because of racial tension, there was evidence of jury intimidation, the verdict was the correct one. All those things are true at the same time
Alright, you seem to, again, direct the conversation into a perspective-less, obtuse peddling and deliberately ignore how Chauvin was tried for his actions, not for racism as a central point. Where the racial load was outside the court case to get justice for what is a factual trend of police brutality of Black men, which is definitely contextualized in racial motivations in diverse ways.

The trial was not about racism, but:

- Second-Degree Unintentional Murder.
- Third-Degree Murder.
- Second-Degree Manslaughter.

He was convicted on all charges, justly. Racism is again, how such murders happen without repercussions, which were the racial issues. And cops often think they can kill Black men without repercussions since many of them only get a slap on the wrist.

The racial issue was the broader social charge that ties into the broader mistreatment by law enforcement of Black males, being callous, thinking they can get away with it. I already wrote down the thing about Ben Shapiro that you clearly read but chose not to acknowledge. Him being wrong, entirely. He framed it as the racial charge biased the court into doing foul play against Chauvin, and uses such framing to also say that the police have no such bias. Don't come to me with the bullshit and set charitabiity on that guy when he has a corrupt agenda.

You're so off the case that you think racial bias in killings of Black men has to do with them saying something racist right before they kill them? You know that no one holds those standards, right? It's foul play that is biased towards Black men, before, during, and after the crime is done, and we interpret that as racism because it has a historic disproportionate tendency. There is history and scholarship on this, not a silly Twitter trend argument, lol. Chauvin's case was a highlight of such representation, no matter if Chauvin would scream, "I love Black people" as he stepped on George Floyd's neck. You've got to use your brain, buddy.

I have repeated myself several times, and if you don't get it, then you're too disingenuous to have this conversation. That is on you. But we're not having that nonsense about Ben Shapiro being right, when he is not. I have demonstrated why and you're not coming here to clean his argument that has an agenda and is based on foul framing.
 
Glad someone finally highlighted this.
The average usatard would accuse u of spreading dei misinformation if u brought this fact to life tho, which is beyond comical at this point.

100% it was a demonic system from jump!
I'm not against law enforcement in general. There are too many demons in the streets but American police is corrupt and it roots and traditions are questionable. I don't support defund the police campaigns or anything. But I do think they need to change the culture in police departments, they need to recurrently psychologically profile the officers and retrain them often in best practices. They also need to extend law enforcement requirements to university degrees so it filters out the bad apples more and prepping the ones going for higher learning in ethics and methodology.
 

Gacmeey

Madaxweynaha Qurbo Joogta 🇸🇴
Alright, you seem to, again, direct the conversation into a perspective-less, obtuse peddling and deliberately ignore how Chauvin was tried for his actions, not for racism as a central point. Where the racial load was outside the court case to get justice for what is a factual trend of police brutality of Black men, which is definitely contextualized in racial motivations in diverse ways.

The trial was not about racism, but:

- Second-Degree Unintentional Murder.
- Third-Degree Murder.
- Second-Degree Manslaughter.

He was convicted on all charges, justly. Racism is again, how such murders happen without repercussions, which were the racial issues. And cops often think they can kill Black men without repercussions since many of them only get a slap on the wrist.

The racial issue was the broader social charge that ties into the broader mistreatment by law enforcement of Black males, being callous, thinking they can get away with it. I already wrote down the thing about Ben Shapiro that you clearly read but chose not to acknowledge. Him being wrong, entirely. He framed it as the racial charge biased the court into doing foul play against Chauvin, and uses such framing to also say that the police have no such bias. Don't come to me with the bullshit and set charitabiity on that guy when he has a corrupt agenda.

You're so off the case that you think racial bias in killings of Black men has to do with them saying something racist right before they kill them? You know that no one holds those standards, right? It's foul play that is biased towards Black men, before, during, and after the crime is done, and we interpret that as racism because it has a historic disproportionate tendency. There is history and scholarship on this, not a silly Twitter trend argument, lol. Chauvin's case was a highlight of such representation, no matter if Chauvin would scream, "I love Black people" as he stepped on George Floyd's neck. You've got to use your brain, buddy.
You are not understanding my initial point. I said Ben is right in saying that there is not evidence Derek was racist, a point most people won’t agree with.
I’ll agree with Ben regarding one thing, race wasn’t a factor guilty or not. I don’t know how anyone can say that Derek put his knee on his neck because he was racist. Zero evidence for that
I never mentioned the trial or anything else, in fact I specifically disregarded it as it wasn’t relevant as to whether Derek was a racist or not. There is no broader argument I was making. Is Derek racist or not? That’s all this was limited to.
You're so off the case that you think racial bias in killings of Black men has to do with them saying something racist right before they kill them? You know that no one holds those standards, right? It's foul play that is biased towards Black men, before, during, and after the crime is done, and we interpret that as racism because it has a historic disproportionate tendency. There is history and scholarship on this, not a silly Twitter trend argument, lol. Chauvin's case was a highlight of such representation, no matter if Chauvin would scream, "I love Black people" as he stepped on George Floyd's neck. You've got to use your brain, buddy.
Okay so how do you come to the conclusion that racial bias was involved? That black people are disproportionately targeted hence Derek must’ve had racial bias? You cannot apply broad social trends to a single case. That extremely flawed analysis. I don’t need him him to say something racist, but you have to be able to substantiate the claim.
 
You are not understanding my initial point. I said Ben is right in saying that there is not evidence Derek was racist, a point most people won’t agree with.

I never mentioned the trial or anything else, in fact I specifically disregarded it as it wasn’t relevant as to whether Derek was a racist or not. There is no broader argument I was making. Is Derek racist or not? That’s all this was limited to.

Okay so how do you come to the conclusion that racial bias was involved? That black people are disproportionately targeted hence Derek must’ve had racial bias? You cannot apply broad social trends to a single case. That extremely flawed analysis. I don’t need him him to say something racist, but you have to be able to substantiate the claim.
You never take notes on what is said because it would invalidate your narrow-minded argumentation, and I don't feel like repeating myself once again. Have a nice day with that Ben Shapiro debate style. You can't have an adult conversation like that because it is disingenuous.
 
You never take notes on what is said because it would invalidate your narrow-minded argumentation, and I don't feel like repeating myself once again. Have a nice day with that Ben Shapiro debate style. You can't have an adult conversation like that because it is disingenuous.
What that user is doing is called "Devil's Advocate". It's aptly named.
 

Gacmeey

Madaxweynaha Qurbo Joogta 🇸🇴
You never take notes on what is said because it would invalidate your narrow-minded argumentation, and I don't feel like repeating myself once again. Have a nice day with that Ben Shapiro debate style. You can't have an adult conversation like that because it is disingenuous.
Sorry you feel that way but you are taking my statement in a direction I never went and don’t care to go. You can call it narrow minded if you want but I have no obligation to engage in a topic just because you bring it up🤷‍♂️
 
White Canadian boomers have a strange inferiority complex there whole identity is “at least we’re better than our southern neighbors ”which was arguably true for middle class folk back in the 90s when it had the highest HDI in the world
yeah it’s a huge cope. The last native residential school was closed down in the mid 1990s. This is where natives were forced to attend by law and basically brainwashed to hate their culture and forced to assimilate. There were a lot of reports of abuse, abuse physical and sexual as well as racism in these schools.
 
All this race talk is simply a division to keep people away from other issues like health care, education, affordability, foreign policy on israel, etc. It's an old tactic thats been used forever.
 

Trending

Top