HUGE BREAKING NEWS! Minneapolis & State Leaders Are Reportedly Preparing For Potential Derek Chauvin Pardon!

[NidarNidar]

The cops have a specific history in America. It started with protecting the slave owner's interests, I think. Which is interesting. Trust me, law enforcement in many other countries has similar kibir, only without gun readiness. I have met some of them and the field attracts certain overcompensating profiles, although America is to a much higher degree.

The only police I've come across are decent are Irish, I got stopped in the UK and Netherlands, and it wasn't as pleasant.

 

[Unicorn]

Ben Shapiro has been the bane of my existence since 2018

He’s the devil’s advocate incarnate

And he has such a whiny ass voice omg...him and jordan peterson sound so bad. Jordan sounds like kermit.

 

[The Somali Caesar]

#FreeChauvin

 

[zesocialanimal]

It was already proven that the drugs did not kill him, if he hadn’t been kneeled on that day he wouldn’t have died.

Not defending Floyd, he was a piece of shit person honestly but he was murdered by the police.

As someone from Minnesota who witnessed the unrest first hand if they try and pardon him I know for a fact niggas will use it as an excuse to riot again

 

[Unicorn]

It was already proven that the drugs did not kill him, if he hadn’t been kneeled on that day he wouldn’t have died.

Not defending Floyd, he was a piece of shit person honestly but he was murdered by the police.

As someone from Minnesota who witnessed the unrest first hand if they try and pardon him I know for a fact niggas will use it as an excuse to riot again

Idk why people think being a bad person leads to the death penalty. Not u but so many racists act like someone(black) who did crime and did their time should not be living anymore. They sound crazy. Of course for their criminals they dont hold the same attitude.

 

[The truth seeker]

The only police I've come across are decent are Irish, I got stopped in the UK and Netherlands, and it wasn't as pleasant.

Irish police

 

[Gacmeey]

I’ll agree with Ben regarding one thing, race wasn’t a factor guilty or not. I don’t know how anyone can say that Derek put his knee on his neck because he was racist. Zero evidence for that

 

[Unicorn]

I’ll agree with Ben regarding one thing, race wasn’t a factor guilty or not. I don’t know how anyone can say that Derek put his knee on his neck because he was racist. Zero evidence for that

They knew each other. Worked at the same place before. ben acts like he doesn't understand the racism angle. It was how the court didn't bring charges up till the city got burned. The court would charge faster if this was a white guy murdered in broad daylight.

 

[Unicorn]

I can look into that guy's eyes, he is one of those who enjoyed it and does not feel any remorse.

His eyes looked like shaytan the first time I watched that video. Like no soul.

 

[The alchemist]

I’ll agree with Ben regarding one thing, race wasn’t a factor guilty or not. I don’t know how anyone can say that Derek put his knee on his neck because he was racist. Zero evidence for that

It's entirely irrelevant if Derek Chauvin loved Black people at the time he put his knees on George Floyd -- the response by Black people, framed in racial terms, was justifiably right for many reasons. The central point of the racialized upheaval was the abuse the police directed at Black men through broad historical and recurrent patterns in the timeline, which can only be explained by racial bias.

People responded to the obvious criminal murder in the sense that they are tired of Black men being killed by these cops with impunity, reacting to the dehumanizing realities without legal reprimand. That is why the socio-political racial tensions grew, and it was directed towards that cause, to change it.

We had many white Americans watching the footage, arguing for Chauvin's case by saying it was good practice. That racist environment is what warranted the racial backlash. You saying Chauvin was not motivated by racism is, again, irrelevant to why people responded and racialized the matter because you gloss over the asymmetrical racial dimentions in America where something like that can happen and people further saying it is good without much justice happening toward the cops that do these acts toward the Black men. That is a racist environment.

And it is not systemic racism, it's racists who use the system with that bias. There is a reason why KKK members can have local meetings in churches without them ever getting caught by the police or ever being tried for spreading ideologically harmful extremism, which is not allowed legally, but only get punished when they do heinous actions. They are allowed to organize and openly talk about a generational genocide against Blacks, but none of them face any consequences for spreading such ideology. It's illegal to cultivate such culture in America by law, but how many times have you seen them be punished by the law and sent to prison? Their leaders are free, having not seen law enforcement for a long time. On the other hand, you have RICO, something used against the mafia, directed at the common Black criminal.

A lot of Americans just don't want to admit that a big section of society is deeply racist, and that it is not the system but the people who carry those biases. The right wing is correct, systemic racism does not exist, but there is racism that is carried out in systemic ways by individuals who are racist.

It does not change that Black Lives Matter was a subversive hyper-leftis organization with shitty corrupt leaders but the underlying sentiment they based themselves on was very much true. They had no right spearheading any Black causes, but somebody had to take up the mantle and speak on it from a Black interests perspective. The vandalism that occurred on normal businesses was wrong, regardless. Although, unlike what many racists want to say, it does not undervalue the injustice and rightful cause to socio-politically level the field in such that Black people are not facing such harm since the people in the system have a strong racial bias against them.

The Karmelo Anthony killing was not racial, but you see how whites made it very racial.

 

[Keep it a boqol]

It's entirely irrelevant if Derek Chauvin loved Black people at the time he put his knees on George Floyd -- the response by Black people, framed in racial terms, was justifiably right for many reasons. The central point of the racialized upheaval was the abuse the police directed at Black men through broad historical and recurrent patterns in the timeline, which can only be explained by racial bias.

People responded to the obvious criminal murder in the sense that they are tired of Black men being killed by these cops with impunity, reacting to the dehumanizing realities without legal reprimand. That is why the socio-political racial tensions grew, and it was directed towards that cause, to change it.

We had many white Americans watching the footage, arguing for Chauvin's case by saying it was good practice. That racist environment is what warranted the racial backlash. You saying Chauvin was not motivated by racism is, again, irrelevant to why people responded and racialized the matter because you gloss over the asymmetrical racial dimentions in America where something like that can happen and people further saying it is good without much justice happening toward the cops that do these acts toward the Black men. That is a racist environment.

And it is not systemic racism, it's racists who use the system with that bias. There is a reason why KKK members can have local meetings in churches without them ever getting caught by the police or ever being tried for spreading ideologically harmful extremism, which is not allowed legally, but only get punished when they do heinous actions. They are allowed to organize and openly talk about a generational genocide against Blacks, but none of them face any consequences for spreading such ideology. It's illegal to cultivate such culture in America by law, but how many times have you seen them be punished by the law and sent to prison? Their leaders are free, having not seen law enforcement for a long time. On the other hand, you have RICO, something used against the mafia, directed at the common Black criminal.

A lot of Americans just don't want to admit that a big section of society is deeply racist, and that it is not the system but the people who carry those biases. The right wing is correct, systemic racism does not exist, but there is racism that is carried out in systemic ways by individuals who are racist.

It does not change that Black Lives Matter was a subversive hyper-leftis organization with shitty corrupt leaders but the underlying sentiment they based themselves on was very much true. They had no right spearheading any Black causes, but somebody had to take up the mantle and speak on it from a Black interests perspective. The vandalism that occurred on normal businesses was wrong, regardless. Although, unlike what many racists want to say, it does not undervalue the injustice and rightful cause to socio-politically level the field in such that Black people are not facing such harm since the people in the system have a strong racial bias against them.

The Karmelo Anthony killing was not racial, but you see how whites made it very racial.

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[The alchemist]

Spoiler

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Ah, the 'BLM' Twitter bio, shallow online activists who lacked the slightest grasp of the deeper issues, but were loud. I remember those days.

 

[The alchemist]

His eyes looked like shaytan the first time I watched that video. Like no soul.

The guy was wicked.

 

[Keep it a boqol]

Ah, the 'BLM' Twitter bio, shallow online activists who lacked the slightest grasp of the deeper issues, but were loud. I remember those days.

It forced blackness on to everyone and it was deemed cool and acceptable and trendy to be pro black by everyone.

 

[The alchemist]

It forced blackness on to everyone and it was deemed cool and acceptable and trendy to be pro black by everyone.

There is a philosopher who broke down how people became profile-based. They attach causes and identities to their personal profiles (to their persona) to signal integrity and moral upstanding without doing any work, and frankly, being full of it. Why? Because we are in a post-authenticity world.


Part of this is scaled by the aggregate nature of social and media technologies with their diffusive capacity.

 

[The truth seeker]

It forced blackness on to everyone and it was deemed cool and acceptable and trendy to be pro black by everyone.

That was the Obama activist Sjw buzzfeed era it officially died last November

 

[Gacmeey]

It's entirely irrelevant if Derek Chauvin loved Black people at the time he put his knees on George Floyd -- the response by Black people, framed in racial terms, was justifiably right for many reasons. The central point of the racialized upheaval was the abuse the police directed at Black men through broad historical and recurrent patterns in the timeline, which can only be explained by racial bias.

People responded to the obvious criminal murder in the sense that they are tired of Black men being killed by these cops with impunity, reacting to the dehumanizing realities without legal reprimand. That is why the socio-political racial tensions grew, and it was directed towards that cause, to change it.

We had many white Americans watching the footage, arguing for Chauvin's case by saying it was good practice. That racist environment is what warranted the racial backlash. You saying Chauvin was not motivated by racism is, again, irrelevant to why people responded and racialized the matter because you gloss over the asymmetrical racial dimentions in America where something like that can happen and people further saying it is good without much justice happening toward the cops that do these acts toward the Black men. That is a racist environment.

And it is not systemic racism, it's racists who use the system with that bias. There is a reason why KKK members can have local meetings in churches without them ever getting caught by the police or ever being tried for spreading ideologically harmful extremism, which is not allowed legally, but only get punished when they do heinous actions. They are allowed to organize and openly talk about a generational genocide against Blacks, but none of them face any consequences for spreading such ideology. It's illegal to cultivate such culture in America by law, but how many times have you seen them be punished by the law and sent to prison? Their leaders are free, having not seen law enforcement for a long time. On the other hand, you have RICO, something used against the mafia, directed at the common Black criminal.

A lot of Americans just don't want to admit that a big section of society is deeply racist, and that it is not the system but the people who carry those biases. The right wing is correct, systemic racism does not exist, but there is racism that is carried out in systemic ways by individuals who are racist.

It does not change that Black Lives Matter was a subversive hyper-leftis organization with shitty corrupt leaders but the underlying sentiment they based themselves on was very much true. They had no right spearheading any Black causes, but somebody had to take up the mantle and speak on it from a Black interests perspective. The vandalism that occurred on normal businesses was wrong, regardless. Although, unlike what many racists want to say, it does not undervalue the injustice and rightful cause to socio-politically level the field in such that Black people are not facing such harm since the people in the system have a strong racial bias against them.

The Karmelo Anthony killing was not racial, but you see how whites made it very racial.

They cannot frame the whole George Floyd thing as racial if there is no evidence of racism. It is extremely as this is being used as an example as to how American police and the judiciary system more broadly is biased against black people. I’m not saying that argument is invalid or unjustified but you cannot make it off the back of calling Derek a racist. (Well they can but it’s based on a lie/unproven fact)

 

[Gacmeey]

They knew each other. Worked at the same place before. ben acts like he doesn't understand the racism angle. It was how the court didn't bring charges up till the city got burned. The court would charge faster if this was a white guy murdered in broad daylight.

They knew each other, so wouldn’t it make more sense that they had a personal issue between rather than Derek being racist? That seems more plausible. My point isn’t that the system isn’t racist, but was Derek racist. That were this whole thing started from

 

[The alchemist]

They cannot frame the whole George Floyd thing as racial if there is no evidence of racism. It is extremely as this is being used as an example as to how American police and the judiciary system more broadly is biased against black people. I’m not saying that argument is invalid or unjustified but you cannot make it off the back of calling Derek a racist. (Well they can but it’s based on a lie/unproven fact)

You missed the whole point there. Chauvin was part of a trend of police brutality against Black men and people had enough of it, and the trend was racially loaded in the actions and the response by the law enforcement, the legal systems and the sentiment of many of the white public. Are you going to deny that or be obtuse about it?

Chauvin was on trial for what he did. Expert opinion came through and the evidence showed he was guilty. Ben Shapiro claims it was the notion of racial tension alone that had set bias into the trial, and the guy is innocent. He also uses George Floyd case as an example of how Black men are not disproportionately targeted by police in foul play cases. He is wrong and foul and that is why you saying he is right is wrong.

 

[The truth seeker]

You missed the whole point there. Chauvin was part of a trend of police brutality against Black men and people had enough of it, and the trend was racially loaded. Are you going to deny that or be obtuse about it?

Chauvin was on trial for what he did. Expert opinion came through and the evidence showed he was guilty. Ben Shapiro claims it was the notion of racial tension alone that had set bias into the trial, and the guy is innocent. He also uses George Floyd case as an example of how Black men are not disproportionately targeted by police in foul play cases. He is wrong and foul and that is why you saying he is right is wrong.

This has been going on for decades since Rodney king in fact its the same cycle someone records a cop beating a black man ,indeed city blacks who are outraged start rioting , white liberal suburban parents who start crying “BLM were allies of the black community ” Then everyone forgets until another incident happens


What I find to be so funny is those white liberal suburban parents support zoning laws that keep there property values high so they can keep minorities out of there area I have found that California and Canada are the best examples of this phenomenon


Property taxes are how schools get there money in America if you live in the inerr city you go to a school that looks like this

If you live in the white

suburbs you go to a school that looks like this