HSM has already been tried and tested, this man was supposed to stabilize the south and what did he do? He tried to disturb PL in Galkacyo. Imagine the level of 'stupidity' in this man's ambuulo brain. Not only did he not pacify the south, he tried to destabilize already peaceful regions.
The other thing is this man promotes 'nationalism' and 'Islamism'.
Islamism that is practised regionally or nationally isn't even proper Islam. They're has been no caliphate after 'Ali' died, the Islamic world had kingdoms only. To have a caliphate you need all Islamic countries united which won't happen. So this guy doesn't even understand Islamism can't be practised with 'ahsabiyah' or 'nationalism' nor can any nation take upon Islamic system unless the whole ummah is united like under the 'rashidun khalifa'.
The other thing he promotes is the 'failed nationalism' of Siyad Barre. Nationalism is IDENTITY politics, it's one of the lowest form of politics. Individualism not 'group' idealogy is what makes a society thrive. To say you hate 'qabyalad' and replace that with another 'group idealogy of nationalism' only shows you how idiotic this man is.
Why is it these 'southies' think it's 'cool' to be seen as a nationalist and 'bad' to be seen as 'qabyalad' driven? both systems are identity politics. In-fact it's well agreed by all political experts that politics isn't national but all local(tuulo). Can't these southies stand on they're own when they keep crying for 'nationalism'?
The other thing is this man promotes 'nationalism' and 'Islamism'.
Islamism that is practised regionally or nationally isn't even proper Islam. They're has been no caliphate after 'Ali' died, the Islamic world had kingdoms only. To have a caliphate you need all Islamic countries united which won't happen. So this guy doesn't even understand Islamism can't be practised with 'ahsabiyah' or 'nationalism' nor can any nation take upon Islamic system unless the whole ummah is united like under the 'rashidun khalifa'.
The other thing he promotes is the 'failed nationalism' of Siyad Barre. Nationalism is IDENTITY politics, it's one of the lowest form of politics. Individualism not 'group' idealogy is what makes a society thrive. To say you hate 'qabyalad' and replace that with another 'group idealogy of nationalism' only shows you how idiotic this man is.
Why is it these 'southies' think it's 'cool' to be seen as a nationalist and 'bad' to be seen as 'qabyalad' driven? both systems are identity politics. In-fact it's well agreed by all political experts that politics isn't national but all local(tuulo). Can't these southies stand on they're own when they keep crying for 'nationalism'?