History is it True?

[DR OSMAN]

Do you think history is even true? you know they say the winner writes history, cause the loser ain't around. Pagan Arabs I doubt where anything as bad as they were told to us, there seems to be holes in the story. I don't think most of modern history is European either, I feel they stole a-lot of from other societies, villages, slavery, women perhaps and attributed to either their own historical figures or contemporary figures to keep up the image. The reason I say that is, sxb they speak nonsense when you see them and you know they just memorising.

Chinese and Asians probably the same. There is very few I have heard that actually made me ever think twice or change my mind, very few and I am sure the case is the same for you also. But then again, it is a human thing this to steal, it's not just a European invention that's where the 'agenda filled racists' go wrong, they would do the exact same thing sxb, you just read their histories and they weren't angels either.

It's human flaw this one not a country or specific flaw, the question is why aren't we playing the same game? that's why I blame us for it and not them so much. Think about if there is no ideas, there is no making, no selling or buying, no services, everything comes to a screeching halt in society, it's a signal point of failure. You can find makers, buyers/sellers, services all of that but you won't ideas.

The other thing I doubt is evolution nowadays, I don't think the weather changes us or why aren't plants changing? I think early humans met up and bands and groups formed clans and tribes. But we didn't evolve separately, you don't get 5 times lucky across all those continents. There was a common origin but we must of bred with other species and we still do you see people even fucking donkeys lol.

 

[DR OSMAN]

But at the end of the day, just don't fall for it anymore. Race, society, language, clan, tribes, even freedom and all that shit democracy they talk about, anything where if a gun is put on your head and u change that isn't real but man made, just keep laughing along with them.

But family is real, I see even animals protect their family. It comes down to family n god as the two biggest realest values in human history. So if you see ppl who treat their family like shit or cant even figure how to manage it, stay away from them because that is real, he wont be genuine about the fake stuff.

So we know now we are adaptable, some at different levels(psychological and feeding them what they wanna hear, some bribes and stomach related, some it has to be a gun like osama bin laden and he will die for it) I suspect the jew also has the same trait. Same as all people if that value has been embedded to supercede the fake values, if the fake values are more prominent his negotiable.

Dont get me wrong though their are some arabs and jews who are no different to us also and negioable if and IF ONLY a fake value has taken lead in their life(freedom, democracy, socialism, politics, nationalism, etc) he is negioable, it's just the ones who have removed the fake values and established around the unchangeable values, it's basically a gun shot to the head for that person.

So in some sense the prophets were right these ppl will fall and rise and it all depends how far they moved around those big core values through-out history and the further they get from it, the more comprised they become.

 

[DR OSMAN]

The only person in the world that gets killed by governments are ppl who don't negiotate, why you think we are still around somalis, africans, etc? they know were negioable and they will handle when they see fit.

Zionism and Islamism are the two biggest threats to the world, they don't negiotate that is an edge if the playin field is evens out. Why you think hitler praised islam? it don't negiotate in their ranks when it's war and jews are the same. Try going to Israel and say you will no longer exist they will happily die by that jerusalem tree.

Wealth hasn't change arabs or jews, usually that changes everyone. They spread their idealogy with their wealth of no negiotation and it's our way only with zionism and islamism. If the west gets bought by this idealogy which it has to a large extent by zionists and islamic world is bought by the islamism.

It's head on collision and it's matter of hub arursi, dhaqaale dhis, idea generations, and getting the edge over the other, it's not centered around negiotations look at the place 70 years now.

 

[Khayyam]

Zionism and Islamism are the two biggest threatsto the world

 

[Grant]

Osman,

Heer and Abtirsi are history.

DNA is history.

Archaeology is history.

Inscriptions and architecture are history.

Photographs are history.

Old writings may or may not have historical value, or their value may not be known. Not all ancient writings were historically accurate or their authors well informed. The same may be said for oral tradition.

Modern writings are also a mixed bag. Some are carefully researched and peer reviewed. Others are just opinion or wishful thinking. Historiography is the science of distinguishing the two. It relies on critical analysis of the links and sources and of the methodology used by the author.

The Somali history that was taught in the 1960's was largely false and/or unbalanced, with an emphasis on the North and little said about the South. DNA and archaeology have changed much of it. What passes for history here is mostly just patriotic BS. It doesn't have to be that way, and it's a shame.

 

[Lil Resse]

History is inherently flawed... there so much "history" we don't know and so many perspectives that we dont know.

 

[DR OSMAN]

Zionism and Islamism are the two biggest threatsto the world

Yeah it is, the jew guy will die by israel and jerusalem(he even singing in capture for 5000 years) and the arab guy will die by allah look at how they penetrated even non arabs with it who suicide bomb themselves, it's an arab value to die by it. That's dangerous if they ever catch up in weapons, tech, money, it's over they have the edge as they go out not fearin death while we will be hands up and surrendering if surrounded cause we are built on values that isnt that important when a gun is on our head and we about to die where-as the jew and arab will happily die. It's all about the edge in life, that's all it comes too.

 

[samaalewarrior]

Lemi brayk it dawn fah u niga, wypipo ain een human, balak pipo bilt duh permidz, weez duh reel jewz n duh furst gad wuz balak, reel hiztry

 

[DR OSMAN]

Maybe most humanity just have sour grapes. But you aint gonna convince me that whites are killers and you aint. That's not convincable, your just as evil but you sit by not doing anything. I always used to sit there and wonder why the world blames whites for everything and I am like but you aint no different if you had the power or you would be much worse and u just read their history and their killing, rapes, stealing, and all the same filth their accusing of whites.

What I don't like about whites is they present an angel image and have a brand marketing system that is brutal.

 

[DR OSMAN]

I laughed at this somali guy once who said u whites all killers, colonizers, and all that and then u point to him but u loot also like mogadishu did, u kill look at the civil war, you trying to steal land SSC. Markas baad nacas noqotan sxb, dont accuse ppl what u do yourself you just lost credibility and show u have sour grapes. What we should do is identify their behaviours and then do IT EVEN BETTER not sit there and cry.

The reason they lead bro is cause they work together, you see it all the time at the family level, WE DONT, we hate each other. We are team that all over the place. We can't even manage our families the divorce rate and single mothers are so high, that's just a single house, no wonder the nation is screwed u aint managing millions of home if u cant do 1 properly.

 

[James Dahl]

It is good to have healthy scepticism of history books and the like, and always consult the primary sources, but you have to be careful not to go too far down the path of "history is bunk" or you end up coming up with crazy theories like Garry Kasparov.

There are three types of bullshit historians; Agenda Pushers, National Glorifiers and the worst of all (in my opinion) the Hagiographers.

The Agenda Pushers have a particular thesis they want history to prove for them. They believe either that free market capitalism is the best economic system, or that the British Empire had positive effects, or that some race has genetic inferiority or whatever bullshit narrative they're peddling and so they cherry pick examples from history and either don't mention or make excuses for historical examples that run counter to the desired narrative. These historians are mostly activists and have no respect for historical fact, and see history as a malleable vehicle for social or political change. Many histories you read are bullshit for this reason that they are written by Agenda Pushers.

The National Glorifiers have a similar desire to the Agenda Pushers but they won't ignore or excuse bad things that happened but rather re-interpret them as betrayals or foreign plots. The National Glorifiers will write vivid depictions of battles where their nation won, and gory sacrificial martyrologies of battles where they lost, emphasizing how their country only lost because some group betrayed them at the last minute (many German glorifiers decided the Jews had betrayed them in World War 1, such as Hitler's bullshit My Struggle book). In every National Glorifier book their nation is the glorious chosen people, who only didn't conquer the entire world due to their own benevolence and/or betrayal and treachery from within.

The final group are the Hagiographers, the most loathsome of the bunch, who are similar to the National Glorifiers but they glorify only one man, Napoleon or Caesar or Steve Jobs. The Hagiographers will write these flawed and often psychopathic leaders as misunderstood geniuses who's brilliance was simple not appreciated by their societies, and singlehandedly led nations or companies or whatever to glory and success. Their banal lives are made to be deeply meaningful full of important significance. Their massacres, injustices or backstabbing that allowed them to get to the top of the heap is never mentioned.

 

[DR OSMAN]

It is good to have healthy scepticism of history books and the like, and always consult the primary sources, but you have to be careful not to go too far down the path of "history is bunk" or you end up coming up with crazy theories like Garry Kasparov.

There are three types of bullshit historians; Agenda Pushers, National Glorifiers and the worst of all (in my opinion) the Hagiographers.

The Agenda Pushers have a particular thesis they want history to prove for them. They believe either that free market capitalism is the best economic system, or that the British Empire had positive effects, or that some race has genetic inferiority or whatever bullshit narrative they're peddling and so they cherry pick examples from history and either don't mention or make excuses for historical examples that run counter to the desired narrative. These historians are mostly activists and have no respect for historical fact, and see history as a malleable vehicle for social or political change. Many histories you read are bullshit for this reason that they are written by Agenda Pushers.

The National Glorifiers have a similar desire to the Agenda Pushers but they won't ignore or excuse bad things that happened but rather re-interpret them as betrayals or foreign plots. The National Glorifiers will write vivid depictions of battles where their nation won, and gory sacrificial martyrologies of battles where they lost, emphasizing how their country only lost because some group betrayed them at the last minute (many German glorifiers decided the Jews had betrayed them in World War 1, such as Hitler's bullshit My Struggle book). In every National Glorifier book their nation is the glorious chosen people, who only didn't conquer the entire world due to their own benevolence and/or betrayal and treachery from within.

The final group are the Hagiographers, the most loathsome of the bunch, who are similar to the National Glorifiers but they glorify only one man, Napoleon or Caesar or Steve Jobs. The Hagiographers will write these flawed and often psychopathic leaders as misunderstood geniuses who's brilliance was simple not appreciated by their societies, and singlehandedly led nations or companies or whatever to glory and success. Their banal lives are made to be deeply meaningful full of important significance. Their massacres, injustices or backstabbing that allowed them to get to the top of the heap is never mentioned.

Notice how Gandhi gets hardly a mention for being the true originator of the peaceful protest(counters aggression as they stand shocked the enemy as how to respond as not to lose it's own base of supporters), they pound that glory to MLK and a lesser extent Mandela. How many Gandhi movies do you see?

 

[UpRightDown]

Yeah it is, the jew guy will die by israel and jerusalem(he even singing in capture for 5000 years) and the arab guy will die by allah look at how they penetrated even non arabs with it who suicide bomb themselves, it's an arab value to die by it. That's dangerous if they ever catch up in weapons, tech, money, it's over they have the edge as they go out not fearin death while we will be hands up and surrendering if surrounded cause we are built on values that isnt that important when a gun is on our head and we about to die where-as the jew and arab will happily die. It's all about the edge in life, that's all it comes too.

Sucide bombing dated back to the chinese, around 16th century AD. Cool isn't it.

 

[Blade1]

Notice how Gandhi gets hardly a mention for being the true originator of the peaceful protest(counters aggression as they stand shocked the enemy as how to respond as not to lose it's own base of supporters), they pound that glory to MLK and a lesser extent Mandela. How many Gandhi movies do you see?

Ghandi was racist who cares. He sold his own people to the brits he was a puppet and a child molester. Look it up