@Periplus
When are you going to learn that the strong do as they will and the weak suffer as they should.
No amount of you pleasing the gaalo and their way is going to help you.
But keep bootyclaping for them and pretending to be Muslim to save your neck.
Your "criticism" doesn't mean jack shit when you have taken all their beliefs and try to "enlighten" us about sodomy while bashing Islam. You are what they call a useful idiot.Kulahaa pleasing and bootyclapping gaalo
I am literally criticising gaalo in this thread, you f*cking doqon.
![]()
Your "criticism" doesn't mean jack shit when you have taken all their beliefs and try to "enlighten" us about sodomy while bashing Islam. You are what they call a useful idiot.
Now you want to come here all concerned to "fight for our rights".
Still mad for calling him out for being gayI am gonna start ignoring you because you just want to start arguments all the time.
Stop following me onto every thread wierdo.
Because you are the ardent defender of them. Now you want to come in here all "concerned".I am gonna start ignoring you because you just want to start arguments all the time based on falsehoods.
This thread is not even about LGBT but you're bringing it up. Why?
Stop following me onto every thread wierdo.
No such thing as a Muslim gay man f@aggot.
Neutral image kulaha, the women probably don't have the "typical" European look, so the employer can kick her off to show a neutral image, since having a different look can cause a disputesBusinesses can sack Muslim women wearing the hijab headscarf if they work face-to-face with customers or if the wearing of the religious clothing causes workplace conflicts, the EU’s highest court has ruled.
Women in Germany who were suspended from their jobs for wearing a hijab to work.
One woman was a carer for special needs children at a childcare provider in Hamburg, while the other woman worked at a cashier at the Mueller drugstore chain. Neither of the women wore headscarves when they began their jobs but decided to start doing so years later.
Court documents show the women were told that this was not allowed and they were at different points either suspended, told to come to work without it.
The EU court in Luxembourg had to decide in both cases whether headscarf bans at work represented a violation of the freedom of religion or were allowed as part of the freedom to conduct a business and the wish to project an image of so-called neutrality to customers.
Its response was that such bans were possible if justified by an employer's need to present a “neutral image”.
The court said: “A prohibition on wearing any visible form of expression of political, philosophical or religious beliefs in the workplace may be justified by the employer's need to present a neutral image towards customers or to prevent social disputes.”
But the justification must be linked to a genuine need on the part of the employer, the court said.
![]()
Muslims could be banned from wearing hijabs at work, EU court says
‘Europe’s obsession with Muslim women’s clothing choices and specifically the hijab is entwined with Islamophobia, racism and misogyny,’ says campaignerwww.independent.co.uk
Neutral image kulaha, the women probably don't have the "typical" European look, so the employer can kick her off to show a neutral image, since having a different look can cause a disputes
They want to please the French state, this is laughable, it just the opposite of Iran hijab lawThey also forget that this neutral image disregards muslim women as it does not represent them.
A neutral image is a company that hires hijabis and non-hijabis, whites and non-whites. Not picking what clothing people should or should not wear.
That is not how the real world works. No one cares about your fake concern while you continue to push the agenda of gaalo.They also forget that this neutral image disregards muslim women as it does not represent them.
A neutral image is a company that hires hijabis and non-hijabis, whites and non-whites. Not picking what clothing people should or should not wear.
Nobody is forcing no one to wear any clothe. You may have some knowledge in African affairs, but no so in French secularism.
The State since 1905 does not intervene in people's choice of religious affiliations.
But, so does Religion in the matter of the State (see the 19th "wars" between Seculars and Clercs in France).
The rule is simple: don't wear, don't show any religious signs in Public Buildings like Schools, the Parliament. And some companies are allowed to reject people who wear religious signs (openly).
Keep in mind: France has come from centuries of Religion Wars, and Secularism has separated the influences of the Church in French's politics and Institutions.
Without it, no religious freedom. An official religion would be a problem for minority religions as they'd have to follow the Commoners religion. Religion intolerance motivated the Secularists to pass the law of 1905.
Anyhow, I'm not even here to argue, but muslim women have to adapt or go back to Shariah-following countries.
Bro @Periplus why you debating that whack? He’s sick and the head and extremely islamophobic. He loves anything and everything white, if people told him to strip naked and run around the globe to become their kin, he’d do it.
The law can be used in the other way as well causing disputes/neutral.When Muslim countries Discriminate against other religious minorities and pushing their religion on to them
Muslims-
When Non Muslim countries do the same thing to persevere their way of life
muslims-![]()