A UN study more or less confirms that there was never any evidence that Eritrea supported Al-Shabab hence why the sanctions were lifted in 2018.yet the possibility cannot be entirely dismissed
Again, this was all the grasping of the straws by the international community. What we can say for certain is that after 2009, Eritrea offered zero implicit support for Al-Shabab.it may well have offered support
Within the backdrop of the war on terror, the ICU was slandered by the U.S and Ethiopia as a Taliban like extremist group. This was in effect no different to how previously Meles claimed that Al-Ittihad was a terrorist group.I am uncertain what the term is even meant to signify in this context
When it came to the ICU's governance of Mogadishu, analysts and journalists never found any evidence of that being the case.
Could you give sources for these? I've seen those claims often but never found any proof. The ICU spokeperson made it abundantly clear that they were only interested in fighting the warlords and controlling southern Somalia, nothing about attacking other countries. Perhaps they meant supporting the ONLF and Somalis in Ethiopia but nothing about going to Addis.who declared openly that his ambition was to liberate Ethiopia from “Christian rule” and to perform the Eid prayer in Addis Ababa
They were opposed to AMISOM yes but that didn't made them extremist. AMISOM was an occupying force causing instability after all.hostile to AMISOM
How about the fact that Al-Shabab was doing terrorist attacks on other countries starting in 2010 whereas ICU never once commited any terrorism in or out ot Somalia.where did they truly differ?
There is a major difference. The ICU was a domestic Islamic-nationalist group that wanted (southern) Somalia governed by sharia. Al-Shabab on the other hands wanted to transform Somalia into an Al-Qaeda province and use the country as a jihadist platform against other countries.Both envisioned an Islamic Somali state governed by Sharia law