Grant

Status
Not open for further replies.

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
The Pungwe River Basin still not Sofala and you've worn the rest of that stuff out.

We're talking about Sofala here old man. :drakewtf:

Sorry, I can give you five links from the google books from by five different historians stating the same thing that Somali merchants from Mogadishu established a colony in Sofala. You're not a historian and you certainly don't have the knowledge like these five scholars so give it up old man.
 
Last edited:
We're talking about Sofala here old man. :drakewtf:

Sorry, I can give you five links from the google books from by five different historians stating the same thing that Somali merchants from Mogadishu established a colony in Sofala. You're not a historian and you certainly don't have the knowledge like these five scholars so give it up old man.

Here's the Pungwe River Basin. It is shared between Mozambique and Zimbabwe and is 249 miles long.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/major-rivers-of-mozambique.html

https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs...weRiver_Sofala.png?itok=YJMEPsSE&action=click

709629-UNOSAT_A3_FL20170118MOZ_PungweRiver_Sofala.png



:The western, upper, parts of the Pungwe River basin consist of argillaceous red soils of a considerable depth. In the mountainous areas the soils are shallower, but can reach larger depths in the valleys. The soils of the region below the plateau are more varying and are classified as clayey-sandy fluvial dark soils, fertile fluvial soils or shallow soils without agricultural potential. A map describing the geology of the Pungwe River basin is presented in Figure 3."

upload_2018-7-28_11-39-15.png


Sofala is a little port on the coast. The Pungwe River Basin goes well into Zimbabwe. This is your link so you should have caught this. As I said, the gold came down river to the port at Sofala. The province name came much later than the port; don't get confused when you read the map. Most of the gold traded in the early years was from the Great Zimbabwe field and was produced from hard rock. Your article is complaining about the mercury in the sediments that was used later to collect placer gold. The two represent two distinctly different time periods.
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
Here's the Pungwe River Basin. It is shared between Mozambique and Zimbabwe and is 249 miles long.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/major-rivers-of-mozambique.html

https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=the+Pungwe+river+basin+in+Mozabique&fr=yhs-iba-1&hspart=iba&hsimp=yhs-1&imgurl=http://img.static.reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/styles/attachment-large/public/resources-pdf-previews/709629-UNOSAT_A3_FL20170118MOZ_PungweRiver_Sofala.png?itok=YJMEPsSE#id=0&iurl=http://img.static.reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/styles/attachment-large/public/resources-pdf-previews/709629-UNOSAT_A3_FL20170118MOZ_PungweRiver_Sofala.png?itok=YJMEPsSE&action=click

709629-UNOSAT_A3_FL20170118MOZ_PungweRiver_Sofala.png



:The western, upper, parts of the Pungwe River basin consist of argillaceous red soils of a considerable depth. In the mountainous areas the soils are shallower, but can reach larger depths in the valleys. The soils of the region below the plateau are more varying and are classified as clayey-sandy fluvial dark soils, fertile fluvial soils or shallow soils without agricultural potential. A map describing the geology of the Pungwe River basin is presented in Figure 3."

View attachment 51364

Sofala is a little port on the coast. The Pungwe River Basin goes well into Zimbabwe. This is your link so you should have caught this. As I said, the gold came down river to the port at Sofala. The province name came much later than the port; don't get confused when you read the map. Most of the gold traded in the early years was from the Great Zimbabwe field and was produced from hard rock. Your article is complaining about the mercury in the sediments that was used later to collect placer gold. The two represent two distinctly different time periods.

Sofala was a port for gold trade. The first people to establish a colony there were Somali merchants from Mogadishu Sultanate then came Kilwa Sultanate and Portuguese Empire afterwards.

Forget Somali history over there. The Portuguese did the same thing. Don't know why you so obsessed with discrediting the Somali history.

"After building a fortified trading post in Sofala in 1505, Portugal expected to control the gold trade and thus guarantee the gold it needed to purchase Indian."

Here: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/13791/4/02Roque_FINAL12.07.17.pdf
 
Sofala was a port for gold trade. The first people to establish a colony there were Somali merchants from Mogadishu Sultanate then came Kilwa Sultanate and Portuguese Empire afterwards.

Forget Somali history over there. The Portuguese did the same thing. Don't know why you so obsessed with discrediting the Somali history.

"After building a fortified trading post in Sofala in 1505, Portugal expected to control the gold trade and thus guarantee the gold it needed to purchase Indian."

Here: https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/13791/4/02Roque_FINAL12.07.17.pdf

You FINALLY got it. Sofala was the port and not the source. Now, work on the rest of it. The Somali merchants were Shirazis.
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
You FINALLY got it. Sofala was the port and not the source. Now, work on the rest of it. The Somali merchants were Shirazis.

Just because it's a port doesn't mean it didn't have mines. Many ports around the world have to have rich resources. I already showed you a source that there are gold mines found in Sofala.

I showed you multiple sources that Mogadishu was always inhabited by Somalis. Shirazis only inhabited the Swahili coast, try harder. By the way, Shirazis are not dark skin nor were they ever referred as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara, that was actually an ancient and medieval term to describe Somalis. Mogadishu was always referred as Bilad Al-Berber lands. You can't repeat the same lies I previously debunked. I showed you a source stated that they were Somali merchants, no misinterpretation here you blind idiot.

EUSUDlpGRsyJiibkF3SLOw.png
 
Last edited:
You FINALLY got it. Sofala was the port and not the source. Now, work on the rest of it. The Somali merchants were Shirazis.
This is silly all this time you were arguing that sofala was just a port and tried to use the same arguement to say shiraz instead of somalis had a colony in sofala because sofala was just a port,its absurd :mindblown:
Sofala at the time was a source of gold,at that time,your whole arguement is that is just a trade port,documented history says that somalis were the first colonist,doesnt matter what sofala was
Trying to discredit somalis not being the first or not even being the colonist because sofala was a port or not
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
This is silly all this time you were arguing that sofala was just a port and tried to use the same arguement to say shiraz instead of somalis had a colony in sofala because sofala was just a port,its absurd :mindblown:
Sofala at the time was a source of gold,at that time,your whole arguement is that is just a trade port,documented history says that somalis were the first colonist,doesnt matter what sofala was
Trying to discredit somalis not being the first or not even being the colonist because sofala was a port or not

He's a historical revisionist troll. I can't wrap my head around it.
 
Just because it's a port doesn't mean it didn't have mines. Many ports around the world have to have rich resources. I already showed you a source that there are gold mines found in Sofala.

I showed you multiple sources that Mogadishu was always inhabited by Somalis. Shirazis only inhabited the Swahili coast, try harder. By the way, Shirazis are not dark skin nor were they ever reffered as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara, that was actually an ancient and medieval term to describe Somalis. You can't repeat the same lies I previously debunked. I showed you a source stated that they were Somali merchants, no misinterpretation here you blind idiot.

EUSUDlpGRsyJiibkF3SLOw.png


You didn't actually read that post with the maps, did you.? The quote you keep posting would be correct if it said traders from Somalia. It's just that you seem to think they were ethnic Somalis, which they most clearly were not. The first Arabs at Sofala were there in 915 AD, and they were said specifically to be Arabs. Besides the timing, Somalis didn't have the ships. Actually read the links in that other thread.

Shirazi men married Bantu and Cushitic women. A couple of generations on you had Swahillis. Do you doubt it happened in Mog and the Banaadir?
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
You didn't actually read that post with the maps, did you.? The quote you keep posting would be correct if it said traders from Somalia. It's just that you seem to think they were ethnic Somalis, which they most clearly were not. The first Arabs at Sofala were there in 915 AD, and they were said specifically to be Arabs. Besides the timing, Somalis didn't have the ships. Actually read the links in that other thread.

Shirazi men married Bantu and Cushitic women. A couple of generations on you had Swahillis. Do you doubt it happened in Mog and the Banaadir?

No, you're the fool here. Somalis have always inhabited Somalia whether it's the interior or the coast. The 13 ancient Somali city-states invented and used beden ship, read my other link on the other thread. Somalis are maritime people, don't ask me some silly questions if they build ships because they did and it's documented.

Who cares the first Arabs founded Sofala. I never claimed that, all I said Somalis established a colony there just like the Kilwa and Portuguese Kingdoms you moron. Are you basically saying these five historians are incorrect? You do realize they are scholars and everything they say is backed up. You need to stop slandering them just because you have an agenda against the Somalis.

I've already proved to you why Somalis have always inhabited Mogadishu so learn to accept the facts. Shirazi only inhabited the Swahili coast and they're not dark skin nor Bilad Al-Berber according to the medieval scholars that visited Mogadishu and the Benadir coast, those are Somali ancestors and no historians dispute that.
 
My reference for today is what I can see on Google Earth. The old administrative area and the Gosha market is gone. Except for one house, my whole street is gone. Main street is about the same, but the town has grown substantially north and somewhat east. The area covered may be four to five times what I remember.

At the town gathering for a movie the Russians showed, I estimate 250-300 people showed up. Photos of the school kids are in that link I posted and don't show that many kids, but the Gosha were not allowed in the Government school and would have added some. There was also an Egyptian school the Gosha kids attended.

The clans in town that I knew, and I did not know them all, were Gosha, Boxn, Geledi, Umar Maxamuud, Shekhaal, Barwaani and Indian. The DC was an Isaaq from the North. The mayor was Gosha. Most of the town worked directly or indirectly for the government, or were merchants or business people. The town supported an Agraria , the leprosarium and much of the government agricultural work in the Lower Jubba. . The Gosha villages were across the river and to the west and southwest. I bought milk from time to time from Sheekhaal Geeljirii just outside town.

What can you tell me about the current size and clan composition? I have heard things I don't want to believe.
What exactly have you heard that you don’t want to believe? Did you meet “Cadcads” when you were in Somalia?
 
No, you're the fool here. Somalis have always inhabited Somalia whether it's the interior or the coast. The 13 ancient Somali city-states invented and used beden ship, read my other link on the other thread. Somalis are maritime people, don't ask me some silly questions if they build ships because they did and it's documented.

Who cares the first Arabs founded Sofala. I never claimed that, all I said Somalis established a colony there just like the Kilwa and Portuguese Kingdoms you moron. Are you basically saying these five historians are incorrect? You do realize they are scholars and everything they say is backed up. You need to stop slandering them just because you have an agenda against the Somalis.

I've already proved to you why Somalis have always inhabited Mogadishu so learn to accept the facts. Shirazi only inhabited the Swahili coast and they're not dark skin nor Bilad Al-Berber according to the medieval scholars that visited Mogadishu and the Benadir coast, those are Somali ancestors and no historians dispute that.

No objective reader would say you've proved a thing. Your misinterpretations and false links are legend with more than just me. Your positions on this topic are uninformed, stubborn, bad politics. Your MO is consistent. You make a claim, support it with out of context and irrelevant misinterpreted quotations, declare victory, make threats, append a link from some unrelated but good source, and then repeat the same nonsense once that is shot down.

Is it time yet to make additions to these threads?

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
No objective reader would say you've proved a thing. Your misinterpretations and false links are legend with more than just me. Your positions on this topic are uninformed, stubborn, bad politics. Your MO is consistent. You make a claim, support it with out of context and irrelevant misinterpreted quotations, declare victory, make threats, append a link from some unrelated but good source, and then repeat the same nonsense once that is shot down.

Is it time yet to make additions to these threads?

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488

You are lying through your teeth. Many people exposed you and said I'm right. My sources are clear except you. It's just you're intellectually dishonest. I declared victory now on this thread proving my point on Sofala. I showed you a source stating they were Somali merchants that established a colony in Sofala and I also showed you a source from a 12th century historian conforming Somali inhabitants in Mogadishu and yet you're still debating me? It's because you have an agenda here to distort Somali history. That's what you are, a historical revisionist troll. By the way, I don't misinterprete anything. I simply quote them.

Also, are all my links false? They are all authentic and are written by multiple historians, don't try slandering them just because they're speaking historical facts and debunking your lying theories. You never provide any source to your claim instead run around in circles talking about irrelevent things that are not part of the topic. I showed you multiple sources why Mogadishu was always a Somali city while you never proved to me Mogadishu was inhabited by foreigners. You're basically a waste of time.

For example, you said Mogadishu and the Benadir coast was an Arab, Persian and Indian enclave. However, a medieval historian called Qadi debunks that when he visits Mogadishu and the Benadir coast and he stated that they were not west or south Asian enclaves but instead dominated and ruled by the native dark skin Africans that spoke their own native African language. What you think of this old man?

img_4863-jpg.28231


Link: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ROZs6lqW9RYC&pg=PA124&dq=mogadishu+dark+skin+enclave&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjs6PeXl7PcAhVCJVAKHY_xC0sQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=mogadishu dark skin enclave&f=false

Yet you still reject every authentic source I show you. It's obvious you have an agenda here to discredit the Somali history. Nothing wrong with me or my sources, it's just you being here trolling around the history section, that's all.
 
Last edited:
You are lying through your teeth. Many people exposed you and said I'm right. My sources are clear except you. It's just you're intellectually dishonest. I declared victory now on this thread proving my point on Sofala. I showed you a source stating they were Somali merchants that established a colony in Sofala and I also showed you a source from a 12th century historian conforming Somali inhabitants in Mogadishu and yet you're still debating me? It's because you have an agenda here to distort Somali history. That's what you are, a historical revisionist troll. By the way, I don't misinterprete anything. I simply quote them.

For example, you said Mogadishu and the Benadir coast was an Arab, Persian and Indian enclave. However, a medieval historian called Qadi debunks that when he visits Mogadishu and the Benadir coast and he stated that they were not west or south Asian enclaves but instead dominated and ruled by the native dark skin Africans that spoke their own native African language. What you think of this old man?

img_4863-jpg.28231


Link: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ROZs6lqW9RYC&pg=PA124&dq=mogadishu+dark+skin+enclave&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjs6PeXl7PcAhVCJVAKHY_xC0sQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=mogadishu dark skin enclave&f=false

Yet you still reject every source I show you.


I said Mog was an Arab enclave. That would be within the walls. The locals were kept out after dark until the Hiraab killed the Muzzaffar governor about 1624. Qadi is a title, not a name. He was an Egyptian and a judge, not an historian. What you are quoting is an interpretation and not the original, which I have dealt with before. Ibn Batuta is not describing Somali dhaqan or court titles, which are both clearly Arab. The source should be rejected. Even so, "... the young scholar would likely have found them all speaking Arabic."

Now, can we get back to this?

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488
 
Last edited:

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP
I said Mog was an Arab enclave. That would be within the walls. The locals were kept out after dark until the Hiraab killed the Muzzaffar governor about 1624. Qadi is a title, not a name. He was an Egyptian and a judge, not an historian. What you are quoting is an interpretation and not the original, which I have dealt with before. Ibn Batuta is not describing Somali dhaqan or court titles, which are both clearly Arab. The source should be rejected. Even so, "... the young scholar would likely have found them all speaking Arabic."

Read this and respond to it wisely. Don't try making excuses now because if you're going to bullshit please don't respond. Also, we will not go back to those until you accept you're wrong here.

I don't know what's your agenda here but he clearly stated Mogadishu and the Benadir coast was dominated by Somalis. They spoke Arabic for religious purposes but overall they spoke their African tongue in their everyday life. He debunks your bullshit.

Now please don't twist Ibn Battuta history. Type in Ibn Battuta and Mogadishu and Somali is mentioned everywhere and I can show you multiple links. No historians dispute this, it's only your historical revisionist agenda here.

Here is everything Ibn Battuta wrote about Mogadishu and Zeila in the 13th century. Where does in day that there were more West asians than Somalis? He said that from Zeila to Mogadishu was Bilad Al-Berber land (medieval name for Somalis).

Source: http://www.classzone.com/books/wh_05_shared/pdf/WHS05_015_424_PS.pdf

I mean he met the Somali ruler of Mogadishu and said he was dark skin part of Bilad Al-Berber race that spoke his native tongue (Somali).

579b2f76-0a93-4584-b4d4-29e6d168dd27-218-00000015e13e6f80-png.28028
img_4843-jpg.28027

By the way, we both know Somalis were referred as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara by the Arabs during the middle ages and I'll post an evidence just so you know I'm right.

Link: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JpNY7VPn1WUC&pg=PA130&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Moving on. You always try to ignore this historian called Yaqut al-Hamawi stated that Mogadishu was inhabited by Swarthly Berbers who are ancestors of Somali people today. Last time I checked Shirazi people are not dark skin nor were they ever referred as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara, that was an ancient and medieval term to describe the Somalis back then.

oDf28lYpTT6WAiSg_vIQtg.png



Lastly, I told you this before. Mogadishu in the medieval times was a province and a port for Ajuran Empire. If you look into Abgaal traditions, they will say they drove Ajuran out of Mogadishu and established a dynasty there to rule Hiraab Imamate.

In fact, the Mudaffar dynasty was a sub-dynasty of the Garen dynasty. They were Ajuran rulers that only ruled the Mogadishu province. They belong to an Ajuran sub-clan called Moorshe who once dominated Mogadishu but they were driven out by Abgaal. However, the Cadcads weren't kicked out but joined the Hiraab Imamate instead. If Cadcads were the main settlers then they would've been driven out so really you're not making any sense here, Grant.

Mudaffar dynasty only ruled Mogadishu which was an Ajuran province and the dynasty was part of the Ajuran stock. They were not Yemeni, it's a complete lie because Ajuran is a Somali clan, not a Yemeni clan.


XabVnPE8RumszMGBD1LPyw.png


I already proved to you why Mogadishu was always settled and dominated by Somalis and I have more sources so you have no excuse here.
 
Last edited:
Read this and respond to it wisely. Don't try making excuses now because if you're going to bullshit please don't respond.

I don't know what's your agenda here but he clearly stated Mogadishu and the Benadir coast was dominated by Somalis. They spoke Arabic for religious purposes but overall they spoke their African tongue in their everyday life. He debunks your bullshit.

Now please don't twist Ibn Battuta history. Type in Ibn Battuta and Mogadishu and Somali is mentioned everywhere and I can show you multiple links. No historians dispute this, it's only your historical revisionist agenda here.

Here is everything Ibn Battuta wrote about Mogadishu and Zeila in the 13th century. Where does in day that there were more West asians than Somalis? He said that from Zeila to Mogadishu was Bilad Al-Berber land (medieval name for Somalis).

Source: http://www.classzone.com/books/wh_05_shared/pdf/WHS05_015_424_PS.pdf

I mean he met the Somali ruler of Mogadishu and said he was dark skin part of Bilad Al-Berber race that spoke his native tongue (Somali).

579b2f76-0a93-4584-b4d4-29e6d168dd27-218-00000015e13e6f80-png.28028
img_4843-jpg.28027

By the way, we both know Somalis were referred as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara by the Arabs during the middle ages and I'll post an evidence just so you know I'm right.

Link: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=JpNY7VPn1WUC&pg=PA130&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Moving on. You always try to ignore this historian called Yaqut al-Hamawi stated that Mogadishu was inhabited by Swarthly Berbers who are ancestors of Somali people today. Last time I checked Shirazi people are not dark skin nor were they ever referred as Bilad Al-Berber or Barbara, that was an ancient and medieval term to describe the Somalis back then.

oDf28lYpTT6WAiSg_vIQtg.png



Lastly, I told you this before. Mogadishu in the medieval times was a province and a port for Ajuran Empire. If you look into Abgaal traditions, they will say they drove Ajuran out of Mogadishu and established a dynasty there to rule Hiraab Imamate.

In fact, the Mudaffar dynasty was a sub-dynasty of the Garen dynasty. They were Ajuran rulers that only ruled the Mogadishu province. They belong to an Ajuran sub-clan called Moorshe who once dominated Mogadishu but they were driven out by Abgaal. However, the Cadcads weren't kicked out but joined the Hiraab Imamate instead. If Cadcads were the main settlers then they would've been driven out so really you're not making any sense here, Grant.

Mudaffar dynasty only ruled Mogadishu which was an Ajuran province and the dynasty was part of the Ajuran stock. They were not Yemeni, it's a complete lie because Ajuran is a Somali clan, not a Yemeni clan.


XabVnPE8RumszMGBD1LPyw.png

'It would probably help if you could read. "...not actually of Ajuraan stock."

Let's get back to this:

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP

Do you have reading comprehension? Do you know what "If not" mean? I didn't know your English level was this bad. Read the whole context because you're proving me day by day that you're an idiotic troll.
:faysalwtf:

"If not" means "or maybe" or "Maybe even". Go learn some English grammar. :russ:

The source basically means related to the Ajuran or perhaps an Ajuran stock itself.


XabVnPE8RumszMGBD1LPyw.png


Like I said, Abgaal traditions are a reality here. If the Hiraab conquest against Mogadishu was to drive Ajuran inhabitants out of Mogadishu then you can't make excuses here. Mogadishu was always dominated by Somalis whether you like it or not.

Now why are you going to ignore my sources on Ibn Battuta and Yaqut al-Hamawi that also debunks your lies?

I told you before, we will not get into that until you accept you're wrong about Mogadishu then we can progress from here.
 
Do you have reading comprehension? Do you know what "If not" mean? I didn't know your English level was this bad. Read the whole context here because you're proving me day by day you're an idiot.
:faysalwtf:

"If not" means "or maybe" or "Maybe even". Go learn some English grammar. :russ:

The source basically means related to the Ajuran or perhaps an Ajuran stock itself.


XabVnPE8RumszMGBD1LPyw.png


Like I said, Abgaal traditions are a reality here. If the Hiraab conquest against Mogadishu was to drive Ajuran inhabitants out of Mogadishu then you can't make excuses here. Mogadishu was always dominated by Somalis whether you like it or not.

Now why are you going to ignore my sources on Ibn Battuta and Yaqut al-Hamawi that also debunks your lies?

I told you before, we will not get into that until you accept you're wrong about Mogadishu then we can progress from here.

I am not wrong about Mog, and you were clearly in the wrong here. Get to it!

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488
 

Factz

Factzopedia
VIP

You are extremely wrong about Mogadishu. I've provided you multiple evidence here. You couldn't even read "if not", how am I supposed to take you serious? I also showed you medieval historians like Qadi, Ibn Battuta and Yaqut al-Hamawi all debunking your bullshit while you didn't show a single source to back up your claims.

Stop dodging the facts old man and accept you're wrong about Mogadishu then we can progress from here.
 
You are extremely wrong about Mogadishu. I've provided you multiple evidence here. You couldn't even read "if not", how am I supposed to take you serious? I also showed you medieval historians like Qadi, Ibn Battuta and Yaqut al-Hamawi all debunking your bullshit while you didn't show a single source to back up your claims.

Stop dodging the facts old man and accept you're wrong about Mogadishu then we can progress from here.

Good Lord, man, are you still claiming the Egyptian qadi was an historian?

Let's deal with this now as it's pertinent to the issues in Mog:

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/...yone-have-more-information-on-it.45990/page-2

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-islam-is-a-blessing-for-men.46027/page-9#post-1259488
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Latest posts

Top