Ghana has an educated diaspora, green lands, lots of rivers, natural resources, a coastline, a democracy and peaceful for 60 years, good relations to the West, etc. Best factors in SSA
And it's still a shithole soon to be surpassed by Cambodia, which liquidated 1/4 of it's population 40 years ago and pretty much all it's educated personnel.
It might be over for Africa @Nilotic
You mean like thisI saw IMF and was like they finished, never take a loan from them hyenas.... or you're finished, your country will be stripped clean.
Ghana has an educated diaspora, green lands, lots of rivers, natural resources, a coastline, a democracy and peaceful for 60 years, good relations to the West, etc. Best factors in SSA
And it's still a shithole soon to be surpassed by Cambodia, which liquidated 1/4 of it's population 40 years ago and pretty much all it's educated personnel.
It might be over for Africa @Nilotic
Race realism isn't popular on SSpotIQ matters
Well they blamed this on colonization
Northern Ghana is a shitholeGhana has an educated diaspora, green lands, lots of rivers, natural resources, a coastline, a democracy and peaceful for 60 years, good relations to the West, etc. Best factors in SSA
And it's still a shithole soon to be surpassed by Cambodia, which liquidated 1/4 of it's population 40 years ago and pretty much all it's educated personnel.
It might be over for Africa @Nilotic
Do you think it has some merit?Race realism isn't popular on SSpot
When it comes to IQ, Iโd imagine that there is some group differences between โracesโ on average but only a couple of points. Nothing too significant. The 1SD gap between blacks and whites in America is mostly environmental but thereโs a small but significant genetic component as well. We also have to realise that the returns of having a high IQ start diminishing very quickly after around 110. As long as you can get a group average to 100, you will have a fully functioning societyDo you think it has some merit?
There are arguements for and against which are valid. Like if its easy to understand that some races do better in sports because of genetics why would it not be the case for intelligence.
The counter argument would be the brain is much more complex than any other muscle/organ. For it to have a massive difference in iq would take millions of years of separate evolution.
Either way i do think race realism is true but over eatimated the difference. I believe education and nutrition would increase the average iq overtime to match European/Asian iq
True, i don't think societies like rome had a high average iq but they were able to produce one of the greatest civilisation on earth.When it comes to IQ, Iโd imagine that there is some group differences between โracesโ on average but only a couple of points. Nothing too significant. The 1SD gap between blacks and whites in America is mostly environmental but thereโs a small but significant genetic component as well. We also have to realise that the returns of having a high IQ start diminishing very quickly after around 110. As long as you can get a group average to 100, you will have a fully functioning society