Let's all discuss this new tech which has ethical question marks. It's gene-editing age. Right now it's very primitive where parents can select genes they want in their kids like 'eye color' but it could get to a stage where it's far more then that. Right now their using selective breeding like they do with dogs. When do u think this will expand into other features such as color of skin, hair type, height, weight, etc. Imagine when it's not selective any-more and u can enter a 'booth' and gene-edit yourself how u wish according to any human group.
What if this gets to the point where u can even shape-shift to animals and back. What if it gets to the point u take the gene of a cheetah(speed) and kangaroo(jumping level) what would that mean for sports?
PPL usually have amnesia about history and forget what is in the consumer market is usually 'cleared' by govt for market consumption. So even if its primitive in our market doesn't mean it's so primitive behind govt facilities. An example to demonstrate that is satellite feeds to google are clearly 'graded' to consumer market as it doesn't have a 'live feed' function but pictures only, this is clear govt interference, where-as we know govt have live feeds and had it for 50 years prior.
Another example is the internet, we only got it in the 90s, where-as they had it in the 50's. If u follow reason n logic, u will see an emerging trend developing that govt always has technology or knowledge that is 50 years ahead of what is in the market and if it does release it to market it's usually cleared/graded for consumers only. So we could safely conclude govt does indeed have a 50 years head-start and what we see in the market is WHAT THEY WANT U TO SEE.
They could possibly have advanced gene editing technology where it's not selective breeding, but where it's at a stage a human can be gene edited to any culture or race to collect intel for their nation. If this is true, well there is no proof it is, but based on reason n logic we can expect they are 50 years ahead in tech n knowledge just based on past tech transfers such as internet/satellite feed to consumer markets. So what that does this mean for us all? well any sound reasonable person will conclude, DONT f*ck WITH GOVT. Don't think your smarter becuz their 50 years ahead anyways.
What if this gets to the point where u can even shape-shift to animals and back. What if it gets to the point u take the gene of a cheetah(speed) and kangaroo(jumping level) what would that mean for sports?
PPL usually have amnesia about history and forget what is in the consumer market is usually 'cleared' by govt for market consumption. So even if its primitive in our market doesn't mean it's so primitive behind govt facilities. An example to demonstrate that is satellite feeds to google are clearly 'graded' to consumer market as it doesn't have a 'live feed' function but pictures only, this is clear govt interference, where-as we know govt have live feeds and had it for 50 years prior.
Another example is the internet, we only got it in the 90s, where-as they had it in the 50's. If u follow reason n logic, u will see an emerging trend developing that govt always has technology or knowledge that is 50 years ahead of what is in the market and if it does release it to market it's usually cleared/graded for consumers only. So we could safely conclude govt does indeed have a 50 years head-start and what we see in the market is WHAT THEY WANT U TO SEE.
They could possibly have advanced gene editing technology where it's not selective breeding, but where it's at a stage a human can be gene edited to any culture or race to collect intel for their nation. If this is true, well there is no proof it is, but based on reason n logic we can expect they are 50 years ahead in tech n knowledge just based on past tech transfers such as internet/satellite feed to consumer markets. So what that does this mean for us all? well any sound reasonable person will conclude, DONT f*ck WITH GOVT. Don't think your smarter becuz their 50 years ahead anyways.