Cuqdad has no place in discussion, let us keep this civil.
Your claim that your method accurately accounts for Somalia’s population (including nomads!) is wrong for the following reasons:
- Nomads do not live in buildings.
- Different gobols have different nomad-rural-urban-IDP ratios.
- There is no way of knowing whether an existing structure is inhabited. This is a strong concern in the case of Bay and Lower Shabelle where much of the population is in IDP camps outside Baydhabo and Banadir. Very likely there is a double count in the case of Bay and counting of abandoned homes in Lower Shabelle.
- The confidence setting you are using is likely too low. Confidence should be set ≥70. I have tried confidence settings below 70 and invariably there are many false positives.
First I redid all of mine to confidence above 85. If it can pick up idps huts it can pick up nomadic huts. Nomads aren't sleeping under the sun they have shelters they take with them and they stay in a place for a while months at a time.
Let's put aside your claims which I view has categorically as false. You claimed waqooyi galbeed has low level of nomadic population.
Can you explain that sir how you came up with that?
And what regions do you consider to have high nomadic populations?
I already said to you best way to know if a region has high level of nomadic population is to look at berkeds and they show up in Google maps.
But you don't like that because it will expose your false statements. Anyway tell us your methods of how you came up with the conclusion of waqooyi galbeed having low nomadic population and sanaag having high nomadic population.
I am curious.