Facial construction of a 4000 year old Nubian

People think pre-Arabian expansion northern Sudan was like how southern Sudan is right now, but that is completely false. Northern un-mixed Sudan was inhabited by different Cushitic groups.

Imagine your brother or sister became an incredibly famous person. Their name and accomplishments became deeply respected in history. Their descendants, many hundreds of years later, look back at them with pride.

due to repeated intermixing over time and the cultural changes that came with it, their physical resemblance to their ancestral population has largely disappeared. Both due to mixing with semetic groups, and also probably with mixing of nilotic groups

Specifically, Upper and Lower Nubia during the early Civilization period was early Eastern Cushitic, Somali-like
I see that you have misconceptions, and I fear you are hiding from being labeled "Hutep" by Egyptian nationalists. The Beja and Nubian peoples share origins resembling the Nilo-Saharan, and Omotic groups. Arab historians used to refer to them as the "sons of Kush," and when you examine the drawings in ancient Egyptian temples, it is clear that the founders of Kushite civilization were people resembling the Nilo-Saharan, and Omotic groups. Meanwhile, the ancestors of Somalis (the Puntites) were depicted as they depicted themselves. What happened is that the Baisaric lands neighbored those of the Kushites, just as Somalis today live in Kenya alongside the Bantu. Modern Sudan has become a melting pot of Kushite, Baisaric, and Semitic races, with intermixed lineages. Egypt today is a mix and intermarriage of ancient Egyptians, Arabs (the largest percentage), Amazigh, Greeks, Turks. Somalis have preserved their racial traits due to limited intermarriage and isolation.

1000045651.jpg

1000045649.jpg

1000045650.jpg

1000045652.jpg


The land of Kush
1000045264.jpg

I have heard many Egyptian Islamist opponents claim that once they come to power, they will fight against the Pharaonic identity and impose an Arab identity. They argue that their physical features are Arab, their language is Arabic, and that the government since the time of Hosni Mubarak enforced the ancient Egyptian identity out of spite for Arabism and Islam—claiming that those who defend this identity are secularists. Currently, they are preparing to overthrow Sisi, whom they accuse of demolishing Arab-Islamic heritage while building churches. Therefore, these Egyptian nationalists will disappear, and Egyptians will declare themselves Arabs, claiming that these antiquities have no connection to them—that they belonged to a people who perished, and that they inherited the land after them, just as is the case in Turkey today (where the Turks came from Central Asia east Turkestan, west of China, migrated to Anatolia, took power from the Byzantines, and intermarried with the local population.).

Look at these antiquities, and I recommend using Pinterest - it contains far more images of wall paintings, statues, and sarcophagi than Google, which is full of the nonsense and lies of Egyptian nationalists and Afrosentrists.

Please focus particularly on the clothing/fashions of that era - then we'll understand where our macawis and dirac originated from.

1000045657.jpg

1000045656.jpg

1000045654.jpg


Tha Land of Baisaric (Currently, Egypt, eastern Sudan, Eritrea and northern Ethiopia are no longer Baisaric lands)

1000045661.png

1000045262.png


Note : I am not saying or claiming that we should reclaim that land, demand Egyptian history, or claim those ancient relics. I am only saying that we should not adopt the delusions of Egyptian nationalists and pretend to have origins that are not ours (like Kush). We should simply acknowledge that we belong to an ancient ethnicity—one that has mostly vanished, with only the Somalis remaining, while the rest have either dissolved into Sudan, Abyssinia, and the Arabs of Egypt.
 
Last edited:
A complete language shift implies integration or coexistence, suggesting that Nilotic groups were not merely a servant caste but lived alongside Cushitic groups as equals. Genetically its hard to square because that linguist shift does not correspond with a higher amount of ancient proto-nilotic ancestry.
Modern Nubian languages derive from Noba *invaders* from the Western Desert in the historical period. Language shifts happen due to all sorts of pressures, no idea where the idea that they had to live among them as 'equals' came from. Either way, I do think Kerma during its earliest phase was Cushitic genetically AND linguistically, but by Kerma classique, the city and people picked up a Sudanic language (pre-Meroitic) by means of matrilineal Sudanic seductresses from Wadi Howar. The influx of negroidic phenotypes in Kerma in arch record lines up perfectly with linguistic dates for Eastern Sudanic migrations into Nile
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top