Everything we do is for women

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't control yourself always ing in my threads clearly your a danyaar and every real nigga knows this world revolves around es you aint got no hoes so you wouldnt understand.

Let me turn this around, what do you against women? You insult them if they don't want you and if they give in they are called s, you marry them young and pretty and when they become older and frail leave them for young woman :)

The lucky woman in this world is a woman who has found a Somali man that will not violate her rights, forget about treating her right, we are at that basic level, and it would beneficial you leave the superficial and look insight yourself :)
 
Last edited:

DuctTape

I have an IQ of 300
Biologically speaking, women are more inherently valuable and less disposable than men.
Being able to treat (or attempt to) an attractive woman like anybody else instead of subconsciously treating them like they are gods is the first step to becoming a true intellectual :rejoice:
 

TooMacaan

VIP
I prefer the cave and inviting a different Neanderthal every other night like a real g I would never share my cave I fought wolves bears tigers and dinosaurs for this shit I’ll be damned if I give it to a chick hell they can find their own caves.

Why when a nation goes to war with another nation the men get killed and women are taken as concubines?
F off, there's no way you'll take caves, neanderthal women, and constant danger over access to Wifi even. The tech age is supreme and cozy/convenient, hope of acquiring vagina motivates men to be the best versions of themselves (although, it drives them to be the worst versions too sometimes..).

Would you rather be raped by a man and then be forced to marry him/be his hoe just to survive....or be killed in battle and die with 'honor'??
 

Cognitivedissonance

A sane man to an insane society must appear insane
Stay WOKE
VIP
F off, there's no way you'll take caves, neanderthal women, and constant danger over access to Wifi even. The tech age is supreme and cozy/convenient, hope of acquiring vagina motivates men to be the best versions of themselves (although, it drives them to be the worst versions too sometimes..).

Would you rather be raped by a man and then be forced to marry him/be his hoe just to survive....or be killed in battle and die with 'honor'??
I prefer a primate lifestyle that’s why I plan to settle back home in a seculeded village with no running electricity I plan to live of the sustenance the most high provides from his Frits and vegetation. Vagina motivates men to be the best version of themselves hence nuclear weapons :comeon:


The point I was trying to make is why are men expendable while women are deemed valuable :cosbyhmm:
 

TooMacaan

VIP
I prefer a primate lifestyle that’s why I plan to settle back home in a seculeded village with no running electricity I plan to live of the sustenance the most high provides from his Frits and vegetation. Vagina motivates men to be the best version of themselves hence nuclear weapons :comeon:


The point I was trying to make is why are men expendable while women are deemed valuable :cosbyhmm:
Say I believe your little hermit haven fantasy, you would STILL be forced to work hard (in fact, much harder..due to lack of electricity) to provide for your multiple youthful wives and the children that she'll be raising. Trad-con life is classic gynocentrism.

Ok, tell me...would you rather have "value" and be forced to hoe for survival...or would you rather be expendable and get to fight to decide your fate???
 

Cognitivedissonance

A sane man to an insane society must appear insane
Stay WOKE
VIP
Say I believe your little hermit haven fantasy, you would STILL be forced to work hard (in fact, much harder..due to lack of electricity) to provide for your multiple youthful wives and the children that she'll be raising. Trad-con life is classic gynocentrism.

Ok, tell me...would you rather have "value" and be forced to hoe for survival...or would you rather be expendable and get to fight to decide your fate???
If female weren’t so materialistic mankind would still be living a minimalistic lifestyles very primitive that’s why the world is in the state that it’s in due to men competing for females affection.


The man that made the nuclear weapon was inspired (Manipulated) to make it cause he wanted to give his wife all the riches in the world.

Women are hypergamous it’s inherent in them it’s part of their primordial nature that’s why a man has to do what a man has to do even if that means he creates a weapon that can kill millions like an atomic bomb in order to get that woman there’s been world wars over women the Ottoman Empire fell cause of women the Roman Empire fell due to women the dajjal biggest supporters will be women where women go men and the children follow.
 
This whole theory is nothing more then bs, the only people who put in the work for this kind of stuff are the beta cuck males and bottom feeders of society.

Every male in a position of power or wealth takes and discards women that they deem to be of high quality all the time, many of them bend over backwards hoping he impregnates them so she is set for the future, the women chase these men relentlessly.

The drug dealers I used to see had a whole harem of the best looking women (no brain whatsoever) fight and compete for them, this is no different to what happened a few hundred/thousand years ago when they competed for the warriors/generals etc.

The same way males are biologically programmed to be attracted to attractive women, the female is equally biologically programmed to be attracted towards males with power/wealth/dominance, this dynamic has never changed through the course of history.

The path towards power/wealth for males started young and often involved tremendous personal sacrifice and grit, it had nothing to do with attracting females but was based on survival, power, leadership and pride, the female wasn't even a consolation or a factor in this, far greater things were at stake then her

Those who use women as a motivation for their actions/ambitions don't achieve much in life, if they fail they destroy themselves and if they succeed that motivation goes out the window, the work stops and mediocrity beckons.
 

TooMacaan

VIP
If female weren’t so materialistic mankind would still be living a minimalistic lifestyles very primitive that’s why the world is in the state that it’s in due to men competing for females affection.
I didn't disagree with this, there's some truth to it.

The man that made the nuclear weapon was inspired (Manipulated) to make it cause he wanted to give his wife all the riches in the world.

#FakeNews

Women are hypergamous it’s inherent in them it’s part of their primordial nature that’s why a man has to do what a man has to do even if that means he creates a weapon that can kill millions like an atomic bomb in order to get that woman there’s been world wars over women the Ottoman Empire fell cause of women the Roman Empire fell due to women the dajjal biggest supporters will be women where women go men and the children follow.
Hypergamy isn't restricted to women; a lot of people are opportunists:camby:. Women don't have some weird bloodlust where they get off on men going to wars and destroying things for them, no woman asks for this. Foot soldiers do it in order to appease their lust, or because they assume it's what women want,-- and the men on the Top (or behind the scenes) profit from it. Women and children lose the most in wars, there's no gain or glory for us.

p.s. You still didn't answer my Q ("valuable" hoe to primitive men, or, revered corpse). Which would you rather?:dabcasar:
 
Last edited:

Cognitivedissonance

A sane man to an insane society must appear insane
Stay WOKE
VIP
I didn't disagree with this, there's some truth to it.



#FakeNews


Hypergamy isn't restricted to women; a lot of people are opportunists:camby:. Women don't have some weird bloodlust where they get off on men going to wars and destroying things for them, no woman asks for this. Foot soldiers do it in order to appease their lust, or because they assume it's what women want,-- and the men on the Top (or behind the scenes) profit from it. Women and children lose the most in wars, there's no gain or glory for us.

p.s. You still didn't answer my Q ("valuable" hoe to primitive men, or, revered corpse). Which would you rather?:dabcasar:
As a woman you have not got a choice I as a man have rights which I gain by going to war and fighting for them sacrificing my life to gain sovereignty whereas you as a female don’t have right you only have privileges I say check your mofo privileges :damedamn:


1. Women have the right to genital integrity
Regardless of how you personally feel about the practice of circumcision (I personally find it barbaric, cruel and completely unjustifiable), the legal fact is that infant girls are protected against any genital cutting of any kind and infant boys are not. Many feminists will argue that female genital mutilation (FGM) is a magnitude of brutality beyond male genital mutilation and while that may be true, I do not find the “it’s only a little bit brutal” argument to be very compelling. It’s like saying cutting off a toe is okay because cutting off a foot is much worse. Ultimately, the argument is immaterial to the fact that women have the legal right to be protected from having their body parts sliced off. Men do not.


2. Women have the right to vote without agreeing to die
In the US, citizens are free to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to democratically choose their own leaders through the process of casting a ballot in an election once they reach the age of 18. Women achieve this right by the simple act of surviving 18 years. Men may not actualize their basic rights as a citizen without first signing a Selective Service card, in which they agree that at the discretion of the democratically elected government, they will take up arms and die to defend their liberty and way of life. The draft. Men may vote if, and only if, they agree they will face death if required. Women have no such obligation, but they do get to vote for the governments that can potentially send men to meet death. Again, regardless of how you feel about the draft, women have the right to vote without agreeing to be drafted. Men don’t.

3. Women have the right to choose parenthood
I’ve written about this before, but it is worth repeating. Women have three options to absolve themselves of all legal, moral, financial and social responsibility for children they did not intend and do not want. Women may abort the child before it is born, they may surrender the child for adoption without notifying or identifying the father or they may surrender the infant under Safe Haven laws and walk away from all responsibility and obligation. Women cannot be forced or coerced into parenthood, but they are legally allowed to force men into financing their reproductive choices. In many states, men can be forced into financial responsibility for children whom they did not biologically father. As long as a particular man is identified as the father, he will be held accountable. Paternity fraud is legal. In no state is legal paternal surrender permitted without the express agreement of the mother.


Again, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with legal paternal surrender, the fact remains that women have the legal right to choose parenthood. Men do not.

4. Women have the right to be assumed caregivers for children
When parental relationships irretrievably break down, current custody laws assume one primary caregiver (almost always a woman) and one tertiary caregiver (almost always a man). In order to win equal or shared custody, the tertiary caregiver must litigate to prove they are worthy of equal parenting, a proposition that is not only very difficult to “prove”, it is also very expensive. The legal presumption of shared parenting upon divorce – that children have a legal right to an equal relationship with both their mother and their father following relationship breakdown – is strongly resisted by the National Organization for Women (NOW) and other feminist organizations who know that women will almost always win custody of children under the default laws. In actual fact, men who can afford to purse legal remedies and challenge primary custody stand a good chance of winning, because women do not have the market cornered on loving or caring for children. So while the law does not specifically indicate that custody will be awarded to women, the defacto result of primary/tertiary caregiver custody law is that women have a legal right to be assumed caregivers for children. Men do not.

5. Women have the right to call unwanted, coerced sex rape
The original FBI definition of rape specifically identified women as the victims, excluding the possibility of male rape victims. When the FBI updated that, it did so in way that includes a small minority of male rape victims but excluded most male rape victims by retaining the “penetration” clause. Penetration of any orifice must occur for rape to have happened. The FBI does collect another set of statistics though, under the category of “other sexual assault” – it’s the awkwardly named “made to penetrate” category, which includes men who were coerced, tricked or bullied into penetrative sex with women they would otherwise not have had sex with. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey similarly considers the two types of assault separately, despite the fact that occurrences are virtually identical. 1.27M women report rape (p.18) and 1.26M men report “made to penetrate” (p.19). By collecting the information under separate categories, following the legal definitions, women have the right to have their rapes called “rape”. Men do not.

https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/08/5-legal-rights-women-have-that-men-dont/
 

TooMacaan

VIP
As a woman you have not got a choice I as a man have rights which I gain by going to war and fighting for them sacrificing my life to gain sovereignty whereas you as a female don’t have right you only have privileges I say check your mofo privileges :damedamn:
:pacspit:I will not check my privilege !! These privileges are nothing compared to the historical sidelining of women; &just like many 3rd world nations have to catch up/recover from the brutal F'ing they've received from Old white men, before any real comparison and progress can be made, women [around the world] too-- need to catch up/recover from how they've been F'd over by men in general.


1. Women have the right to genital integrity
Regardless of how you personally feel about the practice of circumcision (I personally find it barbaric, cruel and completely unjustifiable), the legal fact is that infant girls are protected against any genital cutting of any kind and infant boys are not. Many feminists will argue that female genital mutilation (FGM) is a magnitude of brutality beyond male genital mutilation and while that may be true, I do not find the “it’s only a little bit brutal” argument to be very compelling. It’s like saying cutting off a toe is okay because cutting off a foot is much worse. Ultimately, the argument is immaterial to the fact that women have the legal right to be protected from having their body parts sliced off. Men do not.
I support boys' right to genital integrity; if meant for religious reasons, they should decide whether they want to undergo the procedure when they're 18. The question is, do you believe the same??:umad:Correct me if I'm mistaken but, I vaguely recall you arguing that male circumcision is a good thing. Are you saying that you feel that your parents have stripped you of your integrity?? And, Would you have your son circumcised-- if you were given the opportunity to make that choice in the future??:ummhmm:


2. Women have the right to vote without agreeing to die
In the US, citizens are free to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to democratically choose their own leaders through the process of casting a ballot in an election once they reach the age of 18. Women achieve this right by the simple act of surviving 18 years. Men may not actualize their basic rights as a citizen without first signing a Selective Service card, in which they agree that at the discretion of the democratically elected government, they will take up arms and die to defend their liberty and way of life. The draft. Men may vote if, and only if, they agree they will face death if required. Women have no such obligation, but they do get to vote for the governments that can potentially send men to meet death. Again, regardless of how you feel about the draft, women have the right to vote without agreeing to be drafted. Men don’t.

I guess I'm a hippie, in the sense that I don't support the draft at all..regardless of gender. I believe that neither men or women should be forced to participate in the army without consent. It should be voluntary and done out of individual patriotism, if ever necessary. I'd happily support any form of activism that aims to get rid of the draft tbh; I don't want this legal privilege:kanyeshrug:, you'll receive no white feather from me.

3. Women have the right to choose parenthood
I’ve written about this before, but it is worth repeating. Women have three options to absolve themselves of all legal, moral, financial and social responsibility for children they did not intend and do not want. Women may abort the child before it is born, they may surrender the child for adoption without notifying or identifying the father or they may surrender the infant under Safe Haven laws and walk away from all responsibility and obligation. Women cannot be forced or coerced into parenthood, but they are legally allowed to force men into financing their reproductive choices. In many states, men can be forced into financial responsibility for children whom they did not biologically father. As long as a particular man is identified as the father, he will be held accountable. Paternity fraud is legal. In no state is legal paternal surrender permitted without the express agreement of the mother.

Again, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with legal paternal surrender, the fact remains that women have the legal right to choose parenthood. Men do not.

The reason for this is because women sacrifice a lot more in the process of baby making. Carrying a child and giving birth, while an amazing ability, is also something that has a heavy toll on women- physically, psychologically, emotionally, and mentally. This goes beyond the equal contribution of sperm and egg. Now, I'm not saying it's men's fault that women are dealt this hand --it's just nature after all-- and I'm not a fan of abortion, but it gives more insight on why women should have more right over what happens in these situations (although, men/fathers should definitely have some say too).

As for "men can be forced into financial responsibility for children whom they did not biologically father"-- I 100% agree that this is unfair, and again, I'd support any activism that wishes to strip women of this paternity fraud privilege.

4. Women have the right to be assumed caregivers for children
When parental relationships irretrievably break down, current custody laws assume one primary caregiver (almost always a woman) and one tertiary caregiver (almost always a man). In order to win equal or shared custody, the tertiary caregiver must litigate to prove they are worthy of equal parenting, a proposition that is not only very difficult to “prove”, it is also very expensive. The legal presumption of shared parenting upon divorce – that children have a legal right to an equal relationship with both their mother and their father following relationship breakdown – is strongly resisted by the National Organization for Women (NOW) and other feminist organizations who know that women will almost always win custody of children under the default laws. In actual fact, men who can afford to purse legal remedies and challenge primary custody stand a good chance of winning, because women do not have the market cornered on loving or caring for children. So while the law does not specifically indicate that custody will be awarded to women, the defacto result of primary/tertiary caregiver custody law is that women have a legal right to be assumed caregivers for children. Men do not.
This is the only privilege that you'll see me defending tbh. I do believe that women should have a slight edge and be assumed *primary* caregivers. Again, men and women contribute equally in terms of sperm/egg-- but in the overall process of bringing a baby into this earth, women have to sacrifice in a way that men don't. This sacrifice also results in mothers having a tendency to be attached to their babies, more so than fathers. Ideally, there would be no divorces and this situation could be avoided altogether, or 2nd best option: both parents would be reasonable, put the wellbeing of the children first, and allow equal custody.

If a mother is an inadequate parent though, I support the father's right to custody. My question is: In what ways can the law improve to make it easier for fathers to prove that they'd be more fit as primary givers? MRA should focus on that, or direct their funding into helping individuals (fathers) going through this.
5. Women have the right to call unwanted, coerced sex rape
The original FBI definition of rape specifically identified women as the victims, excluding the possibility of male rape victims. When the FBI updated that, it did so in way that includes a small minority of male rape victims but excluded most male rape victims by retaining the “penetration” clause. Penetration of any orifice must occur for rape to have happened. The FBI does collect another set of statistics though, under the category of “other sexual assault” – it’s the awkwardly named “made to penetrate” category, which includes men who were coerced, tricked or bullied into penetrative sex with women they would otherwise not have had sex with. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey similarly considers the two types of assault separately, despite the fact that occurrences are virtually identical. 1.27M women report rape (p.18) and 1.26M men report “made to penetrate” (p.19). By collecting the information under separate categories, following the legal definitions, women have the right to have their rapes called “rape”. Men do not.
https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/08/5-legal-rights-women-have-that-men-dont/

Again, this is another privilege that a lot of women just don't care for-- the average woman would have no problem with listing "made to penetrate" as a form of rape (although it can't be denied that physically, penetration would cause more damage/severe injuries to victims- regardless of gender). Anyways, most men on this forum (to be fair, men in general) would laugh at you if you suggest that males can naturally be raped by females. Heck, there was even multiple threads here where articles were posted about how female pedophiles (usually teachers) would abuse their power to rape their male students, AND THE MEN ON HERE WERE DEFENDING THE FEMALE RAPISTS/PEDOS:faysalwtf:. They argued that they'd love to be in the position of the male victims, ridiculed the idea of it being called rape, and stated that women couldn't understand their mentality because we're biologically wired differently. It's actually feminists who are vocal about the fact that males can indeed be victims of rape.
 
I prefer a primate lifestyle that’s why I plan to settle back home in a seculeded village with no running electricity I plan to live of the sustenance the most high provides from his Frits and vegetation. Vagina motivates men to be the best version of themselves hence nuclear weapons :comeon:


The point I was trying to make is why are men expendable while women are deemed valuable :cosbyhmm:

war ninyahow wan kula yaabanahey, you are arguing with the wrong person here, @TooMacaan displays much more logic then what the fast majority of women are even capable off in a life time, your dealing with a masculine type of a women here the opposite of those your bashing.

The downside of masculine women is that they tend to be on the lower scale of the attraction ladder and in a lot of cases happen to be downright ugly.

Masculine women are far easier to court because unlike their airhead buffoon cousins they have managed to curtail their wild emotions far better and also have a far superior understanding of the dynamics at play knowing what they want without the emotional baggage.

The choice is between long term success but short/medium term physical displeasure as opposed to long term disaster but short/medium term bliss with the opposite counterparts, it's not an easy trade off to stomach.

You can clearly discern this from her responses how she understands this, your forcing her into defending the types of women she has always subconsciously been in conflict with as a result of your onslaughts.
 

TooMacaan

VIP
war ninyahow wan kula yaabanahey, you are arguing with the wrong person here, @TooMacaan displays much more logic then what the fast majority of women are even capable off in a life time, your dealing with a masculine type of a women here the opposite of those your bashing.

The downside of masculine women is that they tend to be on the lower scale of the attraction ladder and in a lot of cases happen to be downright ugly.

Masculine women are far easier to court because unlike their airhead buffoon cousins they have managed to curtail their wild emotions far better and also have a far superior understanding of the dynamics at play knowing what they want without the emotional baggage.

The choice is between long term success but short/medium term physical displeasure as opposed to long term disaster but short/medium term bliss with the opposite counterparts.

You can clearly discern this from her responses how she understands this, your forcing her into defending the types of women she has always subconsciously been in conflict with as a result of your onslaughts.
:mjlol::gucciwhat:Logical, but masculine and downright ugly kulaha

What kind of negging bs is this?:pacspit:
 
war ninyahow wan kula yaabanahey, you are arguing with the wrong person here, @TooMacaan displays much more logic then what the fast majority of women are even capable off in a life time, your dealing with a masculine type of a women here the opposite of those your bashing.

The downside of masculine women is that they tend to be on the lower scale of the attraction ladder and in a lot of cases happen to be downright ugly.

Masculine women are far easier to court because unlike their airhead buffoon cousins they have managed to curtail their wild emotions far better and also have a far superior understanding of the dynamics at play knowing what they want without the emotional baggage.

The choice is between long term success but short/medium term physical displeasure as opposed to long term disaster but short/medium term bliss with the opposite counterparts, it's not an easy trade off to stomach.

You can clearly discern this from her responses how she understands this, your forcing her into defending the types of women she has always subconsciously been in conflict with as a result of your onslaughts.
Masculine women :russ: walahi you're hilarious:drakelaugh:
 

Bahal

ʜᴀᴄᴋᴇᴅ ᴍᴇᴍʙᴇʀ
VIP
Lol This world doesn't revolve around women

It revolves around money

That's a female mentality, you must've grown up in a family with six sisters and no brothers.

Wallahi Fido would have groupies if he had paper.
 
:mjlol::gucciwhat:Logical, but masculine and downright ugly kulaha

What kind of negging bs is this?:pacspit:

None of that stuff, I can see you been reading those bs alpha male blogs based on the terms your using

Your very well informed with a solid analytical brain but as always something has to compensate 95% of the time and with women it's always looks

You can't have everything in life, things are balanced out, it's rare to find a combo of beauty & brains, it's usually one or the other, and sadly in recent times a whole generation that have neither are growing up

You could be part of the 5% that has both of course, by no means am I insinuating your one or the other but I like to use the theory of probability regardless
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top