One of the clearest signs of this capital accumulation is the rapid expansion of Somalia’s financial sector. You can actually see how many services and institutions have sprung up just to handle the sheer volume of capital flows, transactions, and investments coming from both diaspora and exports. This isn’t just about banks existing , it’s about the constant movement of money, reinvestment, and the multiplier effect it creates for private businesses and wages. The IMF even pointed this out recently in their piece on how financial conglomerates are shaping Somalia’s tax system:
View attachment 370576
blog-pfm.imf.org
Compare that with Ethiopia: the state keeps a tight grip on banking, private banks aren’t allowed in, and most capital gets locked into mega projects or debt repayment rather than flowing into the private sector. As a result, there’s very little financial intermediation farmers, small businesses, even doctors don’t get the kind of access to capital that Somalis do. That’s why Ethiopia has low wages and weak domestic purchasing power, while Somalia’s private sector and service economy are far more dynamic despite all its challenges
I actually explained it somewhat in the Kenyan President thread i made:
I’ve come to understand now that for other Africans, like Kenyans, the lack of access to capital due to weak financial systems makes it hard for them to grasp how Somalis are able to build houses, run malls, finance hospitals, or move huge sums across borders. Since in their economies those financial channels barely exist, they can’t imagine it happening through legitimate means
Somalis didn’t actually sell livestock in large numbers until the late 19th century. That demand was created by the British in Aden and then sustained by the Gulf countries after the oil boom. Before that, Somalis earned from a variety of products, including significant revenue from exporting manufactured goods from major cities like textiles, leather, and jewelry. Pastoral products were mainly meat, milk, clarified butter, and hides.
In many ways, it’s similar to now there’s money being made through agriculture, mining, fishing, frankincense trade, and also livestock.
It’s not much different from today where Somalis build wealth through wage labor, business, trade, services, and logistics. That wealth then goes into towns, housing, and construction, and eventually the wealthiest cities begin reinvesting into manufacturing industries. It follows a sequence:
production → trade → towns → reinvestment → industry.
Most trade was handled internally at first, through exchanges between the coast and the interior and between different settlements. Exports came later as a secondary expansion, but everything started with production and domestic trade before that.
The reason I contrast Somalia with Ethiopia is to show that Somalia’s approach is the right path for tackling poverty and expanding services to the wider population. I plan to use this line of argument in the future to explain Somali economics and back up some of the claims I’ll be making.