Ethiopia and UAE to recognize Somaliland

May Allah destroy the Khawarij governments of Saudi uae and Qatar they were the ones who spread their Wahhabism to every corner of the Muslim world leading to terrorism everywhere wether it’s the Philippines or Nigeria once the oil is finished and the south Asians who built your countries return you goat fuckers won’t last a day
 
May Allah destroy the Khawarij governments of Saudi uae and Qatar they were the ones who spread their Wahhabism to every corner of the Muslim world leading to terrorism everywhere wether it’s the Philippines or Nigeria once the oil is finished and the south Asians who built your countries return you goat fuckers won’t last a day

What happened in the Philippines? Lol
 

Kizaru

Cast in the name of God Ye not Guilty
Dont make this about qabil. Its just common sense. Many of my northern friends claim this is a low iq deal. Only die hard succesionist folks agree with this. Inshallah over the coming months we see who truly what holds us back. We need to offer the people of the north and somaliwayne more then a qabil syndicate
 
Last edited:

Sophisticate

~Gallantly Gadabuursi~
Staff Member
I think some of us sense the naivete.

Ethiopia, with a population of 120 M, has been hungry for sea access since its loss of Eriteria. SL has a population of ~3-4 Million. The man in charge of that nation is a Warhawk that sets ethnic groups against each other. The country is in a worse financial predicament and has defaulted on loans. How do you also intend to control migration? There is an asymmetry in power, with SL disadvantaged.

SL is one of the poorest unrecognized nations out there. Other than some semblance of peace until last year. It doesn't have much to boast about in 30 years. It is a place where corruption is also rife. With this admin they have differed elections even longer and caused a significant amount of trouble by harming citizens in SSC. Remember, they were the first to strike. The government has also contributed to the death toll and the worsened economic predicament SL sees itself in.

In addition, they cannot be trusted with resource exploration due to a lack of transparency with the public regarding contracts. The leaders in power have a for sale sign attached to their heads, like many other leaders on the continent. They do not mind becoming richer while the people remain poor and disenfranchised.

Also, sadly, because of unresolved war trauma, isolationism and propaganda, they have allowed themselves to be emotionally manipulated by the false promise of full nationhood. Which requires a lengthy process and being in front of the ICJ. The locals also seem to project this false idea that Samaroon is fully on board. When that is far from the truth. You need full stakeholder support which isn't fully there.
 
Last edited:

Kizaru

Cast in the name of God Ye not Guilty
I think some of us sense the naivete.

Ethiopia with a population of 120 M has been hungry for sea access since its loss of Eriteria. The man in charge of that nation is warhawk that sets ethnic groups against each other. The country is in a worse financial predicament and has defaulted on loans.

Still SL is in a poorer predicament as one of the poorest unrecognized nations out there. Other than some semblance of peace until last year. It doesn't have much to boast about in 30 years. It is a place where corruption is also rife they have differed elections and caused a significant amount of trouble by harming citizens in SSC. They were the first to strike.

They cannot be trusted with resource exploration due to a lack of transparency with the public regarding contracts. The leaders in power have a for sale sign attached to their heads. They do not mind the people remaining poor and disenfranchised. Also, sadly because of unresolved war trauma, isolationism and propaganda they have allowed themselves to be emotionally manipulated by the false promise of full nationhood. Which requires a lengthy process and being infront of the ICJ. The locals also seem to project this false idea that Samaroon are fully on-board. When that is far from the truth. You need full stakeholder support and that isn't fully there.
basically qabil. Shit turned us into a joke. What are the people in north going to offered if they want to stay. Somalia just swaps between 2 clans. The die hard successionists use the current political situtation in somalia to sway the populus into believing their existence is non visable. Shit has to change
 
🪘🥁صياحكم طرب يا ولاوين


1704309191033.png


A new Horizon is set to begin in the horn :denzelnigga:
 

Sophisticate

~Gallantly Gadabuursi~
Staff Member
basically qabil. Shit turned us into a joke. What are the people in north going to offered if they want to stay. Somalia just swaps between 2 clans. The die hard successionists use the current political situtation in somalia to sway the populus into believing their existence is non visable. Shit has to change
In a way, I understand the dilemma. The successionists are very committed to the idea and have spent so much time on this mission to let it go. The sunk cost fallacy is at play, where the more you invest, the more reluctant you are to abandon it. I mean, it is understandable when loss and fear motivate their desire for self-determination and establishment as a nation with all the perks that come with it. However, I'm not sure how plausible it is.

Some people experienced losses during the war and developed some distrust/feeling of betrayal, under the impression they only had themselves to rely on i.e. family/qabil. Justice is also unlikely, especially in Somalia, where people often get away with war crimes often aided and abetted by their clansmen. However, what may start as a movement with good intentions, like liberation from injustice, can turn sour. And they may also not have entirely clean hands either.

I think SL was in a unique position over the past 30 years to advance further than it has. It was given many opportunities even to have the seat of power transferred to the north and shared or work with nearby SSC or PL while the south was adjusting. I highly doubt the idea of centralized power would ever come back, so fear of state-sanctioned violence was not as imminent. They made some bad moves in the East in the past 20 years. And they did a poor job at diplomacy. They never fully considered qabil inclusion. To be deemed bold or revolutionary by Somalis, you must go against the norm and fight the urge to be clanist favouring competency and integrity instead. They argue that they have representation of other clans, but it's window dressing and doesn't even meet the baseline criteria of transformative leadership.​
 
Last edited:

Kizaru

Cast in the name of God Ye not Guilty
In a way, I understand the dilemma. The successionists are very committed to the idea and have spent so much time on this mission to let it go. The sunk cost fallacy is at play, where the more you invest, the more reluctant you are to abandon it. I mean, it is understandable when loss and fear motivate their desire for self-determination and establishment as a nation with all the perks that come with it. However, I'm not sure how plausible it is.

Some people experienced losses during the war and developed some distrust/feeling of betrayal, under the impression they only had themselves to rely on i.e. family/qabil. Justice is also unlikely, especially in Somalia, where people often get away with war crimes often aided and abetted by their clansmen. However, what may start as a movement with good intentions, like liberation from injustice, can turn sour. And they may also not have entirely clean hands either.

I think SL was in a unique position over the past 30 years to advance further than it has. It was given many opportunities even to have the seat of power transferred to the north and shared or work with nearby SSC or PL while the south was adjusting. I highly doubt the idea of centralized power would ever come back, so fear of state-sanctioned violence was not as imminent. They made some bad moves in the East in the past 20 years. And they did a poor job at diplomacy. They never fully considered qabil inclusion. To be deemed bold or revolutionary by Somalis, you must go against the norm and fight the urge to be clanist favouring competency and integrity instead. They argue that they have representation of other clans, but it's window dressing and doesn't even meet the baseline criteria of transformative leadership.​
true. Somaliland couldve actually laid the foundations for somalia's growth but chose the isolationalist and spectator. Somalia then had no hope whatsoever
 
true. Somaliland couldve actually laid the foundations for somalia's growth but chose the isolationalist and spectator. Somalia then had no hope whatsoever
What?? reer konfur ignoraned us from taking part to rebuilt the old republic by going on their own way thinking the whole nation belongs to them so that's why we went in our own way too by restoring the soverginity of our lost state that gained its independence on June 26 1960
 

Sophisticate

~Gallantly Gadabuursi~
Staff Member
true. Somaliland couldve actually laid the foundations for somalia's growth but chose the isolationalist and spectator. Somalia then had no hope whatsoever
:mjpls:If I was fearful and felt historically wronged I would choose to be a gaajo fish in a smaller pond. My adrenals and mental resources would be too exhausted to see a kursi, newfound relevancy and a visionary outlook focused on ensuring Somali prosperity.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top