Dr Osman Political/Economic/Social Philosophy

[DR OSMAN]

I want to make it clear so people don't assume I have no 'philosophy' and therefore no political goals. I don't see real philosophy driven parties in Somalia to even join a camp, but I also am of the view Somalia isn't ready for democracy(which I will explain).

But this is the following areas I will die for never switch or negiotate away(unless due to extreme circumstances where a loss-loss situation happens).

1. Federalism following in PL Model. Igu 'Gowrac' you will never see me shift unless this isn't achieved where I may switch into confederation, sovereignty camp or even 99 year treaty model like hong kong n china.

2. Economic policy. Im a mix of capitalism/communism and only select the positive areas of each system based on 1960-69(free market) vs 1969-1991(communist). I am totally anti aid-charity-ngo becuz it doesn't cure poverty becuz poverty is their industry. I am totally against black market economics post 91.

3. Social policy. I am going to die for the human right camp. I believe rights are inherited from GOD for all humans thru 'adam'. I don't think humans should interfere or think they are some 'god' who controls this but should only 'protect' it. I am 100% against the idea rights are only for identities(ethnic, tribe, gender, religion, political group)

4. I believe all leaders when they develop an 'aragti' and have 'social masiir' should discuss implementation models of their political goals, benefits/losses, time-line, negiotations needed(only if the other side is the same)

5. If you don't have an 'philosophy' then I assume you can't have political goals but ulterior motives(xaa cuna, destruction, lug goyo, bal ii arka)

 

[DR OSMAN]

The above areas I will 'die' for and will never 'tanasul' unless in 'extreme situations' where it's proven to me that it may lead to more 'problems and even then I will still hold onto it so the 'future' generation can know i was ahead of my time.

I am pro democracy but I don't feel Somalia has the local conditions needed for it which is financial independence/high education becuz those variables are strong where-ever it's successful, where-ever it's absent they are usually 'weak or dysfunctional' democracies. But I won't step on anyone toes if they so wish to implement with the conditions prevailing but don't say I didn't warn you.

 

[DR OSMAN]

Say for example The South had a party where the following philosophies existed

1. Strong Federalism
2. Mix of 1960-1969 free market and 1969-1991 communism
3. Social policy guided by Human rights
4. Foreign policy philosophy(not flip flop)
5. Security philosophy.

Im still un-decied on no 4 and 5 so I need to develop my philosophy

Where-as PL had this party

1. Centralism(conserving the past system)
2. Free Market like 1960-69 with aid/charity model
3. Islamic rigid social system
4. No Foreign policy
5. No security policy

I will die for HAG party becuz my philosophy won't change becuz of qabiil or personal interest. PPL introduced idealogical driven parties for a reason dummy to combat ppl supporting things over social identity(gender, ethnic, tribe, race, religion) becuz govt is what it can do for the country and people.

 

[DR OSMAN]

I do know Foreign policy should have goals linked too it

1. Spreading your system preferrably thru soft diplomacy rather then hard, radical change(military, sanctions, etc). If hard/radical change is warranted then post state model must be settled and interim rule period to set that up.

But respecting the internal sovereignity is 'paramount' as it's a UN member state RIGHT becuz if one nation is violated it can lead to the rule based order to be violated which can lead to internal rebellions inside countries or big countries swallow small. But we must carefully have good relations with weapon producing nations 4 knowledge transfer so we dont do what siyad did rely on 'trade supply'. Of course VETO council. Then general assembly we need to manage as brothers in faith brothers in humanity policy.

2. Joining global alliance balancing 'cultural/religious brothers' but not neglecting brothers in humanity especially those with similar human rights values/democracies only if our govt has that system. The neutrality posture only means both sides who-ever wins will 'harm' u where-as if u throw ur lot one way u have 50/50 chance but some neutrality experts do exist like OMAN.

3. Maintaining trade partners or expanding it with a careful balance on no 1 and 2. Even grading trade partners on importance(bagaash partners vs arms partners or knowledge transfer partners are not the same weight)

4. Security 'dimension' at local-regional-continental-cross continental we don't live on an 'island' philosophy I do support.

 

[DR OSMAN]

But I am against foreign policy where we do not 'dhaxal' anything and just re-circulate around established areas(such as africa mid east) we need to leave behind something during our time so the future can inherit it.