if the choice is between starving and working is it really a choice? Also during industrialization, the wealthy forced everyone from their lands and livelihoods, so they had to work for them before forcing them to work for a low wage. Anyway that isn't the only argument against the exploitation of labour but I'm not going to get it to it now.
that's because many of the founding fathers were freemasons, it isn't as crazy as it seems just new-age spirituality for the rich.