Documentary about dark-skinned "First Swede" Geeljires spark horror on twitter

These were not the first humans. These were Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in Europe for over 50,000 years.

They left Africa 80,000-70,000 years ago. That is a long ass time ago.

They do not cluster with Africans, do not share recent lineages with Africans, and are definitely not African.



They had straight hair, European skulls, and blue eyes. Hardly black. This is just some propagandist nonsense. Closest people to them today are again: Lithuanians.
https://indo-european.eu/2019/07/vi...astern-ancestry-in-the-whole-baltic-iron-age/
 

Ras

It's all so tiresome
VIP
Dark skinned could mean many things.

Everyone is considered dark skinned compared to Swedes.
 

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
5c6bb6f5dda4c8dc628b4634.jpg

An ad for an upcoming documentary about ‘The First Swedes,’ who were dark-skinned and blue eyed, has prompted fear and denial on Twitter.
The series will start to air on Swedish television this Wednesday, and when channel SVT began promoting it last week, some people reacted on social media with disbelief and anger.

The documentary will look at DNA technology which has revealed more about how Sweden was populated after the Ice Age and detailing how the first pioneers in the country were dark-skinned with blue eyes and came from the south.


Another population of people who had paler skin and a variety of eye and hair colors arrived around the same time from the east. The two peoples are thought to have mixed fairly quickly, and Nordic people eventually became lighter skinned, allowing them to increase their vitamin D production to survive in the dark winters.

Some Twitter users took the information advertised in the documentary as some sort of conspiracy aimed at making people more open to immigration. “Indoctrination continues,” one said.


Others were quick to challenge the skepticism.





I personally find blue eyes very sexy,
 

TekNiKo

Loyal To The One True Caliph (Hafidahullah)
VIP
@Knowles your just mad that your White Savior were originally geeljires

:siilaanyolaugh::siilaanyolaugh:
 

World

VIP
SLC24A5

The one they always use to claim whether ancient samples are dark or light. I think it is dumb to base it just on that. Ancient people could have had phenotypic SNPs not known or uncommon today.
SLC24A5 is only responsible for 25-40% the pigmentation difference between Europeans and Africans (that is if you’re AA).
 

Tukraq

VIP
These were not the first humans. These were Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in Europe for over 50,000 years.

They left Africa 80,000-70,000 years ago. That is a long ass time ago.

They do not cluster with Africans, do not share recent lineages with Africans, and are definitely not African.



They had straight hair, European skulls, and blue eyes. Hardly black. This is just some propagandist nonsense. Closest people to them today are again: Lithuanians.
were talking skin color here that enough
 

TekNiKo

Loyal To The One True Caliph (Hafidahullah)
VIP
@Apollo thinks he is smarter than the white man who used to CRISPR technology to analyze their phenotypes in their DNA
 
@Apollo thinks he is smarter than the white man who used to CRISPR technology to analyze their phenotypes in their DNA

Yeah - and all that advancement most have come to the conclusion that the first Swedes looked like Nigerians.

Nigerians and all NiggerKongo are the most hybrid race alive. Must explain why they have all these wierd phenotypes not present in any other human population which we code as the standard for black.

This unmixed race are the result of east african men raping half-human half-pygmies in west africa ffs. Europeans are more human and much less hybridized than them.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top