Apollo
VIP
Even Dutch news sites and Belgian report the same that early Euros were darkskin.
Skine tone genes are not well known. I carry the so-called white/pale version of that specific SNP they use as evidence, but I am not white. Kkkk.
Even Dutch news sites and Belgian report the same that early Euros were darkskin.
Which one?Skine tone genes are not well known. I carry the so-called white/pale version of that specific SNP they use as evidence, but I am not white. Kkkk.
Which one?
https://indo-european.eu/2019/07/vi...astern-ancestry-in-the-whole-baltic-iron-age/These were not the first humans. These were Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in Europe for over 50,000 years.
They left Africa 80,000-70,000 years ago. That is a long ass time ago.
They do not cluster with Africans, do not share recent lineages with Africans, and are definitely not African.
They had straight hair, European skulls, and blue eyes. Hardly black. This is just some propagandist nonsense. Closest people to them today are again: Lithuanians.
An ad for an upcoming documentary about ‘The First Swedes,’ who were dark-skinned and blue eyed, has prompted fear and denial on Twitter.
The series will start to air on Swedish television this Wednesday, and when channel SVT began promoting it last week, some people reacted on social media with disbelief and anger.
The documentary will look at DNA technology which has revealed more about how Sweden was populated after the Ice Age and detailing how the first pioneers in the country were dark-skinned with blue eyes and came from the south.
Another population of people who had paler skin and a variety of eye and hair colors arrived around the same time from the east. The two peoples are thought to have mixed fairly quickly, and Nordic people eventually became lighter skinned, allowing them to increase their vitamin D production to survive in the dark winters.
Some Twitter users took the information advertised in the documentary as some sort of conspiracy aimed at making people more open to immigration. “Indoctrination continues,” one said.
Others were quick to challenge the skepticism.
SLC24A5 is only responsible for 25-40% the pigmentation difference between Europeans and Africans (that is if you’re AA).SLC24A5
The one they always use to claim whether ancient samples are dark or light. I think it is dumb to base it just on that. Ancient people could have had phenotypic SNPs not known or uncommon today.
were talking skin color here that enoughThese were not the first humans. These were Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in Europe for over 50,000 years.
They left Africa 80,000-70,000 years ago. That is a long ass time ago.
They do not cluster with Africans, do not share recent lineages with Africans, and are definitely not African.
They had straight hair, European skulls, and blue eyes. Hardly black. This is just some propagandist nonsense. Closest people to them today are again: Lithuanians.
@Apollo thinks he is smarter than the white man who used to CRISPR technology to analyze their phenotypes in their DNA