Do you see Palestine being free in your lifetime?

Do you see this happening in your lifetime?


  • Total voters
    36

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
I'm strictly talking based on the genetic datas we have and btw why do you have a picture of Polisario ?
Show me the data.


I support the occupied peoples :francis:

You can't let another people rule your own.


Arab-Berbers ruling Sahwari land is wrong.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
If the Jews touch Al-Aqsa to build a third temple they're declaring war against ALL Muslim nations.

Even the people who bootyclap America.
 
Show me the data.


I support the occupied peoples :francis:

You can't let another people rule your own.


Arab-Berbers ruling Sahwari land is wrong.

BXPMUnr.png


and why do you say "occupied" while the border between morocco and western sahara was made by europeans to separate the spanish possessions from the french one.

here a map of Morocco before the french protectorate :
maroc avant la colonisation.jpg


Western sahara never existed before so there is no occupation here
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
BXPMUnr.png


and why do you say "occupied" while the border between morocco and western sahara was made by europeans to separate the spanish possessions from the french one.

here a map of Morocco before the french protectorate :
View attachment 125216

Western sahara never existed before so there is no occupation here
:drakewtf:So the people living on that land has no right to control it and have to live under oppression.

Colonialism cut the natives in half because they were Bedouins and eventually became city dwellers.


The Moroccans are claiming lands which was controlled by a dead kingdom
 
:drakewtf:So the people living on that land has no right to control it and have to live under oppression.

Colonialism cut the natives in half because they were Bedouins and eventually became city dwellers.


The Moroccans are claiming lands which was controlled by a dead kingdom

wait whut ? :what:

The people living on that land are similar to other moroccans so yes moroccans have the right to decide about Moroccan lands. And They are not claiming lands of a dead kingdom simply because this kingdom is still "alive" (same dynasty and that's why moroccan monarchy is one of the oldest in the world : https://www.oldest.org/politics/monarchy/ )

It was a french protectorate which means they still recognized the moroccan monarchy and didn't erase it.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
wait whut ? :what:

The people living on that land are similar to other moroccans so yes moroccans have the right to decide about Moroccan lands. And They are not claiming lands of a dead kingdom simply because this kingdom is still "alive" (same dynasty and that's why moroccan monarchy is one of the oldest in the world : https://www.oldest.org/politics/monarchy/ )

It was a french protectorate which means they still recognized the moroccan monarchy and didn't erase it.
The people who are Sahwari are not like the Arab-Berbers

The Sahwari speak Hassaniya Arabic and have different admixtures compared to the Northerners.

So basically you're using the straw-man argument to win this debate in your favour:mjlol:

For e.g. If an Afar came to your house and said he used to own it and he had the right to live there and took it over:gucciwhat:


The people only want it to exploit resources for their own benefit.

The Almohad empire at its greatest extent, c. 1180โ€“1212[1][2]

Almohad (dead kingdom)
The Marinid realm at its maximal extent (1347โ€“1348)

Marinid (dead kingdom)


Map of the Wattasid sultanate (dark red) and its vassal states (light red)

Wattasid
The light pink is vassal state so not technically part of Morocco (dead kingdom)


Extent of the Saadian empire during the reign of Ahmad al-Mansur[1]

Saadi (dead kingdom)

How are the people there Moroccans if the native people are Sahwari and suffer oppresion from the Secret Police and the Berber settlers.
 
The people who are Sahwari are not like the Arab-Berbers

The Sahwari speak Hassaniya Arabic and have different admixtures compared to the Northerners.

So basically you're using the straw-man argument to win this debate in your favour:mjlol:

For e.g. If an Afar came to your house and said he used to own it and he had the right to live there and took it over:gucciwhat:


The people only want it to exploit resources for their own benefit.


Almohad (dead kingdom)

Marinid (dead kingdom)



Wattasid
The light pink is vassal state so not technically part of Morocco (dead kingdom)



Saadi (dead kingdom)

How are the people there Moroccans if the native people are Sahwari and suffer oppresion from the Secret Police and the Berber settlers.

that's like saying atlas people are not moroccans because they speak chleuh :stopit:

and genetically they are similar to other moroccans.

also you posted only "dead" dynasties but the current one is the alawite dynasty and that was their territory before the french protectorate :

Empire_alaouite_-_XVIIIe_s (1).png


and this dynasty still rules morocco today.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
Furthermore, @Dawalhabaad you saying that the people of Morocco have the right to take over the land is saying they have the right to annex Mali,Mauritania,Tunisia,Algeria and Libya even though their own people don't originate there.

Funny how that's colonial if they're taking over people's lands and exploiting them.
 
Furthermore, @Dawalhabaad you saying that the people of Morocco have the right to take over the land is saying they have the right to annex Mali,Mauritania,Tunisia,Algeria and Libya even though their own people don't originate there.

Funny how that's colonial if they're taking over people's lands and exploiting them.

They have the right to claim mauritania, northern mali and a good part of western algeria simply because it belonged to the alawite dynasty. The same dynasty that rules Morocco today.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
They have the right to claim mauritania, northern mali and a good part of western algeria simply because it belonged to the alawite dynasty. The same dynasty that rules Morocco today.
Would the same people be happy though.

Why are you backing an oppressive regime.

Would an Algerian support it?

Morocco abuse the indigenous people of Western Sahara if they speak up.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
that's like saying atlas people are not moroccans because they speak chleuh :stopit:

and genetically they are similar to other moroccans.

also you posted only "dead" dynasties but the current one is the alawite dynasty and that was their territory before the french protectorate :

View attachment 125243

and this dynasty still rules morocco today.
You know that the green is the Ottoman Empire though:mjpls:
 
Would the same people be happy though.

Why are you backing an oppressive regime.

Would an Algerian support it?

Morocco abuse the indigenous people of Western Sahara if they speak up.

What you don't understand is that those conflicts are the direct consequences of european colonialism and you're supporting the way they divided Africa.
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
What you don't understand is that those conflicts are the direct consequences of european colonialism and you're supporting the way they divided Africa.
So you agree with the concept of colonialism though.

Exploitation and Invasion.:comeon:
 

Invader

๐Ÿ‘พpส…ษนoส pวส‡ษส…วxแด‰d ษ uแด‰ ฦƒuแด‰สŒแด‰ส…๐Ÿ‘พ
Exploitation for their own benefits not the colony = Phosphate and Fish of Western Sahara.
Invasion= The Green March and the constant oppression of the people there.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top