Degenerate Menenists Getting Offended Over Fact

[Timo Jareer and proud]

Most retarded shit I have ever replied to. My brain cells have dilutes and my IQ point's have dropped down to the cursed number of 68. What a terrible sight to read.

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

Y'all are probably like, 'wow dis Oromo nigga probably said some f*ck shit to piss off these cadaans ahey?"


This is all I said to start this.

 

[The alchemist]

I have a suugo-theory: If the Jews didn't circumcise their children, then it would be viewed much more negatively by the West today.

 

[Tukraq]

I have a suugo-theory: If the Jews didn't circumcise their children, then it would be viewed much more negatively by the West today.

most American christians do it too, not just a jew thing

 

[The alchemist]

most American christians do it too, not just a jew thing

That was surprising. It's not normal among Whites in Europe.

 

[saredochani10]

Y'all are probably like, 'wow dis Oromo nigga probably said some f*ck shit to piss off these cadaans ahey?"


This is all I said to start this.


View attachment 77739

Is that your whole name? Also how can you read with that font ! My eyes .

I see people talking about that everywhere now. But not too much in Europe.

 

[Tukraq]

That was surprising. It's not normal among Whites in Europe.

American whites are more religious(only 3 percent atheist), and had stricter beginnings in the start religiously, a lot of things like nudity isn't really accepted here, parts of the Bible Belt are christian fundamentalists and make things like abortion illegal in their states

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

Is that your whole name? Also how can you read with that font ! My eyes .

I see people talking about that everywhere now. But not too much in Europe.

Pardon! I can see how the font can look annoying for some people. Next time, I'll take a screenshot on my PC lol.


Yes and no for the name part. Only my name to my maternal family. My Dad side does not regonize it. Kinda complected lol I go by two names.

 

[saredochani10]

Pardon! I can see how the font can look annoying for some people. Next time, I'll take a screenshot on my PC lol.


Yes and no for the name part. Only my name to my maternal family. My Dad side does not regonize it. Kinda complected lol I go by two names.

C'est tranquil. . Not annoying at all. Just weird lol.

 

[AIOPZ]

I have a suugo-theory: If the Jews didn't circumcise their children, then it would be viewed much more negatively by the West today.

If Americans didn't decide to copy the Jews in the 19th century, it would be viewed faaar more negatively nowadays.

 

[AIOPZ]

"The child never gave his consent!" is a pretty manipulative argument. Children don't consent to a lot of the things we make them do - be it attending classes, doing their chores, making them eat their veggies, etc. However, we would never use "consent" as a prerequisite for any of the aforementioned reasons we make them do those things. This is entirely because of the fact that we as the guardians of our offspring have concluded that these activities are beneficial for the child and that their input is not necessary in order to determine what is and what isn't best for them. Circumcision does not "mutilate" the child no so more than ear piercings do. The child's penis continues to work perfectly. Do to the virtually nonexistent cons of circumcising (that are easily balanced by the cons of not circumcising) + the potential religious convictions that can be motivated behind circumcision, gaals eventually jump on the defense of the lack of child "consent".


No, sovereignD; a child getting circumcised is not the same as a child getting raped, you absolute neanderthal.

 

[Timo Jareer and proud]

"The child never gave his consent!" is a pretty manipulative argument. Children don't consent to a lot of the things we make them do - be it attending classes, doing their chores, making them eat their veggies, etc. However, we would never use "consent" as a prerequisite for any of the aforementioned reasons we make them do those things. This is entirely because of the fact that we as the guardians of our offspring have concluded that these activities are beneficial for the child and that their input is not necessary in order to determine what is and what isn't best for them. Circumcision does not "mutilate" the child no so more than ear piercings do. The child's penis continues to work perfectly. Do to the virtually nonexistent cons of circumcising (that are easily balanced by the cons of not circumcising) + the potential religious convictions that can be motivated behind circumcision, gaals eventually jump on the defense of the lack of child "consent".


No, sovereignD; a child getting circumcised is not the same as a child getting raped, you absolute neanderthal.

Wow you verbally rapped and murdered them bismillah