Cushite NBA player!!! His people are the cousins of Somalis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ha. Nice joke. All peer-reviewed studies have proven that Tutsis are pretty much identical to Hutus and that they were a Nilotic group who eventually adopted a Bantu language.

The Tutsis were colonial lackeys and held majority of the power since independence. That's the main origin of conflict and they were not considered "illegal aliens".


That's complete bullshit. The Cushitic languages have been around for max 3k years, and Somalis/other Horn of Africans have looked the way they do before agriculture was even invented.
When I say Cushites I don't mean Cushitic speakers. I mean the historical Cushites who were said to have originated in Mesopotamia and spread accross the globe (esp Africa and South Asia).
Also, you're saying that the Natufian/Neolithic Farmer ancestry has had no impact on our current phenotype???

P.S: You seem to have a lot of interesting things to say, but do try not to be so conscending towards others sxb. You might know more about certain things and others might know more about other things, no one is superior to anyone else
 
When I say Cushites I don't mean Cushitic speakers. I mean the historical Cushites who were said to have originated in Mesopotamia and spread accross the globe (esp Africa and South Asia).
No idea what you're talking about.

Also, you're saying that the Natufian/Neolithic Farmer ancestry has had no impact on our current phenotype???
There is difference between a particular group having impacted your phenotype, and saying that our "ancestors" were Nilotics. Sure our genetic make up is pre-historic East African DNA + Natufician, but that doesn't make them our "ancestors". And you made it out as if that E-African component most similar to modern day Nilotics (-Bantu admixture) made up all of our genetics.
 

Sophisticate

~Gallantly Gadabuursi~
Staff Member
No idea what you're talking about.


There is difference between a particular group having impacted your phenotype, and saying that our "ancestors" were Nilotics. Sure our genetic make up is pre-historic East African DNA + Natufician, but that doesn't make them our "ancestors". And you made it out as if that E-African component most similar to modern day Nilotics (-Bantu admixture) made up all of our genetics.

:mjlol: They have poor eyes. Anyone with a slim nose and elongated features is classed as Somali. Ego-centric. Even when they have little if any relation to Somalis. If Ethiopians are distantly related to Somalis with a genetic distance of 3,000 years, why would a Tutsi be a close relative to us?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending

Top