Yes two warsans or were they called wardas but either way they should be ready in coming months/years for their freedom to vanish by shackles of the babyTwo....?
Yes two warsans or were they called wardas but either way they should be ready in coming months/years for their freedom to vanish by shackles of the babyTwo....?
wtf? huh? pls explainYes two warsans or were they called wardas but either way they should be ready in coming months/years for their freedom to vanish by shackles of the baby
I am basically trading in other harti girls for them since their bestfriends from sanaag which i must locked down before this blessed chance passes me so wish me luckwtf? huh? pls explain
The best but only if i am running itclan politics won't die in Somalia because the people would never let it, why would they give up model that works so good for them in giving them power and representation, while protecting them from marginalization by the government, the thing we won't ever go to is dictatorship aka worst form of government
dosent matter who's running it, dictatorship is as bad as it can possibly get, how in the world do you make the best nation for your people if there options or criticism don't hold weight and can get them jailed, also theres no dissenting voice just yes men so when things go wrong its not corrected or noticed, basically becoming a clusterfuck, worst possible type of government possibleThe best but only if i am running it
my curse on you getting banned ain't working!then only mjs will be left cuz they all midgets. maybe u meant the other around (ie get rid of the shorter people).
Still better than murders/raptists running around but i meant a fair dictatorship unlike the pastdosent matter who's running it, dictatorship is as bad as it can possibly get, how in the world do you make the best nation for your people if there options or criticism don't hold weight and can get them jailed, also theres no dissenting voice just yes men so when things go wrong its not corrected or noticed, basically becoming a clusterfuck, worst possible type of government possible
Explain your dislike for mjs sxbthen only mjs will be left cuz they all midgets. maybe u meant the other around (ie get rid of the shorter people).
no such thing as a fair dictatorship, and they fail the fundamental principle guiding a successful nation and thats infringing on the individual rights of the people, dictatorships always end bad for a reason, and are never effective during, pretty much what we have currently is even better, which is why I think were doing better than those countries with dictatorships, id take anarchy over dictatorshipStill better than murders/raptists running around but i meant a fair dictatorship unlike the past
the only Somali 7footer I've seen was an MJthen only mjs will be left cuz they all midgets. maybe u meant the other around (ie get rid of the shorter people).
I bet you would but having softie leaders is not good at all as progress is simple but rule of law must be enforcedno such thing as a fair dictatorship, and they fail the fundamental principle guiding a successful nation and thats infringing on the individual rights of the people, dictatorships always end bad for a reason, and are never effective during, pretty much what we have currently is even better, which is why I think were doing better than those countries with dictatorships, id take anarchy over dictatorship
its not about being soft, the constitution should allocate the executive or basically the president very little power where he should act on basically what the people want so giving representatives a lot of power but having those representatives have very short terms so if they don't satisfy there constituency there out, pack you bags, president is basically a public servant in this case not a ruler and the things the people want happen, creating a healthy country, dissent or rivalry between representatives are also good to get all sides usually done by parties, but here is where its useful for clans in Somalia where they take the party role and every mp fights on behave of his people/constituents aka clan and nobody is marginalized,I bet you would but having softie leaders is not good at all as progress is simple but rule of law must be enforced
Yes but since the majority are not represented like they should be in the federal government than the states can do as they please without threats to them to balance out the scaleits not about being soft, the constitution should allocate the executive or basically the president very little power where he should act on basically what the people want so giving representatives a lot of power but having those representatives have very short terms so if they don't satisfy there constituency there out, pack you bags, president is basically a public servant in this case not a ruler and the things the people want happen, creating a healthy country, dissent or rivalry between representatives are also good to get all sides usually done by parties, but here is where its useful for clans in Somalia where they take the party role and every mp fights on behave of his people/constituents aka clan and nobody is marginalized,
all thats left would be a supreme or higher court to keep corruption and politicians in check and you have a well functioning democracy along with a free market and you will easily get a strong nation
honestly even states should have power that the feds can't step over and a Supreme or higher Court to rule over it, the feds should be limited in most areas of government other than really foreign policy and ceremonial gestures, people have more voice with there respective states but these can be even further divided so every area and clan have proper representation at the federal level while the states do there own thingYes but since the majority are not represented like they should be in the federal government than the states can do as they please without threats to them to balance out the scale
Yeah but it looks like xamar is headed back wards towards the past than the present or futurehonestly even states should have power that the feds can't step over and a Supreme or higher Court to rule over it, the feds should be limited in most areas of government other than really foreign policy and ceremonial gestures, people have more voice with there respective states but these can be even further divided so every area and clan have proper representation at the federal level while the states do there own thing
its good, it represents the people entirely since everyone has a clan, if every clan is looking out for there self intreats why is it a bad thing because that means everyone benefits, kind of like the polarized party system in America which is a good thing
Like ahmed the president of jlYou mean clan leaders looking out for their self interest win while their ignorant clan members pick up the bill?
There's no such thing as democracy within clans... only influential leaders get to make a decision and they could easily get corrupted.
Clan politics helped us stave off mass starvation during past drought and protected us from raids from others.
However clan politics was never the best way to get shit built and trade rules enforced.
If you give clan leaders political power they'd would start to act like war lords.
then only mjs will be left cuz they all midgets. maybe u meant the other around (ie get rid of the shorter people).