ChatGPT is woke...lets ask it more questions

NordicSomali

NordicSomali

Screenshot 2023-01-14 at 19.41.38.png
 
The alchemist

The alchemist

VIP
ChatGPT doesn't give extra insight in the sense of things that push things to the next level of knowledge. All it does, which carries some value, is organized and structure information on a first-level basis. It can vary in a predictable way like all programmed machines running on rigid lines. For example, sometimes it can give you stages for how to perform pretty sophisticated surgery, but most times only provides base-level information when you seek to understand information on the novel theoretical edge.
 
NordicSomali

NordicSomali

The alchemist said:
ChatGPT doesn't give extra insight in the sense of things that push things to the next level of knowledge. All it does, which carries some value, is organized and structure information on a first-level basis. It can vary in a predictable way like all programmed machines running on rigid lines. For example, sometimes it can give you stages for how to perform pretty sophisticated surgery, but most times only provides base-level information when you seek to understand information on the novel theoretical edge.
Click to expand...
its much better than Google, this thing will replace Google in a few years
 
The alchemist

The alchemist

VIP
NordicSomali said:
its much better than Google, this thing will replace Google in a few years
Click to expand...
I don't think it will replace Google for various reasons. Google is in a different market, and both of them furnish different value propositions. Now, Google can integrate such technology into its architectural base to enhance and transform upon what is by far one of the most successful companies ever. They furthermore have a lot of money to spare for AI research and got a big quality data storage if they needed to train those systems.

I don't know the outlook for OpenAI or what they seek. For them to compete with Google is requires a 180-degree change from what ChatGPT is.

I think the future of systems is a cross-network incorporative function. What I mean by this is a less limitations on the overall landscape and totally different competitive market game. Big disruption and crazy scaling capacity for new players with new flexible ways for innovation.
 
NordicSomali

NordicSomali

The alchemist said:
I don't think it will replace Google for various reasons. Google is in a different market, and both of them furnish different value propositions. Now, Google can integrate such technology into its architectural base to enhance and transform upon what is by far one of the most successful companies ever. They furthermore have a lot of money to spare for AI research and got a big quality data storage if they needed to train those systems.

I don't know the outlook for OpenAI or what they seek. For them to compete with Google is requires a 180-degree change from what ChatGPT is.

I think the future of systems is a cross-network incorporative function. What I mean by this is a less limitations on the overall landscape and totally different competitive market game. Big disruption and crazy scaling capacity for new players with new flexible ways for innovation.
Click to expand...
Since one of the owners is Microsoft I expect it to integrated into their products perhaps even Bing, but yes its a different market than Google but it will definitely take a marketshare from Google.
 
The alchemist

The alchemist

VIP
NordicSomali said:
Since one of the owners is Microsoft I expect it to integrated into their products perhaps even Bing, but yes its a different market than Google but it will definitely take a marketshare from Google.
Click to expand...
I think the big companies like Microsoft, Meta, Google, etc. are spending a shit ton of money and increasing energy on their research branch to transform and take hold of the future on a first-mover advantage basis that in a way does not seek to hold the status quo of competitive stasis.

Take the Metaverse, most find it ridiculous (which it is), but they are playing the long game. None of us will laugh in 20 years because these companies seek to control the influence of people's demands too. It's a worthwhile money-sink because the outcome can be a many times higher market share -- the future is increasingly oligopolic.
 
NordicSomali

NordicSomali

The alchemist said:
I think the big companies like Microsoft, Meta, Google, etc. are spending a shit ton of money and increasing energy on their research branch to transform and take hold of the future on a first-mover advantage basis that in a way does not seek to hold the status quo of competitive stasis.

Take the Metaverse, most find it ridiculous (which it is), but they are playing the long game. None of us will laugh in 20 years because these companies seek to control the influence of people's demands too. It's a worthwhile money-sink because the outcome can be a many times higher market share -- the future is increasingly oligopolic.
Click to expand...
I think the metaverse might have applications when I come to an office, if you can save all the hardware that an office has like a computer, keyboard, screen etc. and replace that with a vr headset then there's tons of money in saving. That's one application I find useful, not the bullshit waste of money Facebook is planning.

Google I think is very far ahead in quantum computing since they recently revealed a major step in that field. I can't imagine the magic we will witness if quantum computing is combined with artificial intelligence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending

Latest posts

Top