Books on Aqeedah and additional commentary on them from the scholars.

[Farax bin Cabdi bin Bakri]

السلام عليكم

Thought I would share some links of some books of Aqeedah here, saw some posted in the pinned thread but here are some additional ones. There's a lot of baraka to be had learning from these books and benefitting from the scholars. These should all be in English but it may contain the initial text in Arabic just to start, and may Allah increase us all in knowledge.

Usool al thalatha (commentary from Sheikh Uthaymeen)

Qawaid Arba (commentary from Sheikh Bin Baz)

Kitab at tawheed vol 1. (commentary from Sheikh Uthaymeen)

Kitab at tawheed vol 2.

Nawaqid Al Islam (commentary from Sheikh Abdur-Razzaq-al-Badr)

Usool as sittah (commentary from Sheikh Uthaymeen)

Al Aqeedah al Wasitiyah vol 1. (commentary from Sheikh Uthaymeen)

Al Aqeedah al Wasitiyah vol 2.

In the future if more books are requested I can try posting them inshallah.

 

[Abdalla]

Walle you guys are brainwashed, 5/6 books written by Sheikh Ibn Abdiwahhaab

 

[Farax bin Cabdi bin Bakri]

Walle you guys are brainwashed, 5/6 books written by Sheikh Ibn Abdiwahhaab

Does he scare you or something? These are basic books of aqeedah in english and among the most popular and easiest to read (especially with the additional commentary), any scholar would recommend these books as good reading material. If you call clear principles of aqeedah from the Qu'ran and Sunnah "brainwashing", then I have nothing else to say you.

 

[Abdalla]

Does he scare you or something? These are basic books of aqeedah in english and among the most popular and easiest to read (especially with the additional commentary), any scholar would recommend these books as good reading material. If you call clear principles of aqeedah from the Qu'ran and Sunnah "brainwashing", then I have nothing else to say you.

You’re not that firm when someone insults the prophet but hell breaks loose if one doesn’t share your admiration to you Saudi scholars. Check your walaa wal baraa

It’s brainwashing to refer to mainly 1 sheikh. Alhamdulilah us Ahlu Sunnah, we have many scholars. We have Ibn Taymiyyah, ibn Kathir, Ibn Qayyim, the 4 Imams, Awzaa’i, At thawri, ibn Rajab, ibn Hajar, Imam Nawawi, ibn abi shujaac the

Aqeedah books
Aqeedah assalaf wa Ashaab Al-Hadeeth by Abu uthmaan Al-Sabuni
Kitaab Al-Tawheed- Imam Bukhari
Kitaab Assunnah by Imam ibn Hanbal
Sharh Al-Sunnah by Al-Barbahaari
Kitaab Ithbaat- by Imam Bayhaqi

And many many more. There are up to 80 aqeedah book classics and you’ve chosen 5 written by 1 sheikh. Is that not fanaticism?

 

[Farax bin Cabdi bin Bakri]

You’re not that firm when someone insults the prophet but hell breaks loose if one doesn’t share your admiration to you Saudi scholars. Check your walaa wal baraa

It’s brainwashing to refer to mainly 1 sheikh. Alhamdulilah us Ahlu Sunnah, we have many scholars. We have Ibn Taymiyyah, ibn Kathir, Ibn Qayyim, the 4 Imams, Awzaa’i, At thawri, ibn Rajab, ibn Hajar, Imam Nawawi, ibn abi shujaac the

Aqeedah books
Aqeedah assalaf wa Ashaab Al-Hadeeth by Abu uthmaan Al-Sabuni
Kitaab Al-Tawheed- Imam Bukhari
Kitaab Assunnah by Imam ibn Hanbal
Sharh Al-Sunnah by Al-Barbahaari
Kitaab Ithbaat- by Imam Bayhaqi

And many many more. There are up to 80 aqeedah book classics and you’ve chosen 5 written by 1 sheikh. Is that not fanaticism?

You accuse me of being lacking when defending the honor of the Prophet (ﷺ) war Illahay ka baq you slander with no proof that shows your lack of knowledge and manners.

You insist on insults based on something with zero proof, dalil, nothing. If you want to post more books of Aqeedah who is stopping you? But no you just stoop to a low ground and attack with no justification. You say I'm a fanatic because I mention some of the most popular books of aqeedah known to be an good starting place (with commentary) for English readers, is this the best proof you have? The Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab percentage was too significant? If someone posts books of fiqh, and they post 5 books from Sheikh Salih Al Fawzan, are they now fanatics? If they post hadiths and they choose 5 from Sunan Abu Dawood are they fanatics of him as well? Wallahi there is no khair in the slanderous manner of your speech now.

I literally stated at the end "In the future if more books are requested I can try posting them inshallah." Indicating I'm happy to post more books, but these are basic books recommend by scholars of ahlul Sunnah, will you then go on to call them brainwashed for recommending students start with usool al thaltha, then read kitab at tawheed, and Qawaid Arba? You are lacking of respect I suggest you reflect deeply on what you're saying before typing next time.

 

[Omar del Sur]

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was a great scholar. He is hated by the extreme sufis, by shia, by liberals. But he is a great scholar and it is really great to study his works.

Another thing is it is weird how people try to put a divide between Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and Ibn Taymiyyah. There were both Salafis and they both had the same kinds of beliefs.

 

[Hamzza]

You’re not that firm when someone insults the prophet but hell breaks loose if one doesn’t share your admiration to you Saudi scholars. Check your walaa wal baraa

It’s brainwashing to refer to mainly 1 sheikh. Alhamdulilah us Ahlu Sunnah, we have many scholars. We have Ibn Taymiyyah, ibn Kathir, Ibn Qayyim, the 4 Imams, Awzaa’i, At thawri, ibn Rajab, ibn Hajar, Imam Nawawi, ibn abi shujaac the

Aqeedah books
Aqeedah assalaf wa Ashaab Al-Hadeeth by Abu uthmaan Al-Sabuni
Kitaab Al-Tawheed- Imam Bukhari
Kitaab Assunnah by Imam ibn Hanbal
Sharh Al-Sunnah by Al-Barbahaari
Kitaab Ithbaat- by Imam Bayhaqi

And many many more. There are up to 80 aqeedah book classics and you’ve chosen 5 written by 1 sheikh. Is that not fanaticism?

Are you for real @Abdalla? How can you take Aqeedah from these different scholars who themselves don't agree on Aqeedah?

Bayhaqi: Ashari
Nawawi: Ashari
Ibn Hajr: Ashari
Ibn Taymiyyah: Hanbali/Athari
Ibn Qayyim: Hanbali/Athari
Al Sabuni: Athari

 

[World]

A list of books to stay away from

 

[Abdalla]

Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab was a great scholar. He is hated by the extreme sufis, by shia, by liberals. But he is a great scholar and it is really great to study his works.

Another thing is it is weird how people try to put a divide between Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab and Ibn Taymiyyah. There were both Salafis and they both had the same kinds of beliefs.

Those two sheikhs are not to be compared. Ibn Taymiyyah is head and shoulders above him.

 

[Abdalla]

Are you for real @Abdalla? How can you take Aqeedah from these different scholars who themselves don't agree on Aqeedah?

Bayhaqi: Ashari
Nawawi: Ashari
Ibn Hajr: Ashari
Ibn Taymiyyah: Hanbali/Athari
Ibn Qayyim: Hanbali/Athari
Al Sabuni: Athari

ibn hajr and nawawi were strong in fiqh and haven’t commented a lot on aqeedah. They have their mistakes. They disagreed with a lot of the Ashari fundamentals. We Ahlu Sunnah make excuses for the remaining of their errors. Please read Ibn Taymiyyahs great work رفع الملام عن الأئمة الأعلام
Raf’ al-Malaam ‘an al-A’immah al-Al-A’laam (The Removal of Blame From the Great Imams). Ibn Taymiyyah goes deep into the reasons why some scholars made mistakes and where it originated from. Truly beneficial book and it will make you balanced and just in your judgements

But to suggest 6 books and 5/6L from 1 sheikh is clear cut programming.

 

[Farax bin Cabdi bin Bakri]

ibn hajr and nawawi were strong in fiqh and haven’t commented a lot on aqeedah. They have their mistakes. They disagreed with a lot of the Ashari fundamentals. We Ahlu Sunnah make excuses for the remaining of their errors. Please read Ibn Taymiyyahs great work رفع الملام عن الأئمة الأعلام
Raf’ al-Malaam ‘an al-A’immah al-Al-A’laam (The Removal of Blame From the Great Imams). Ibn Taymiyyah goes deep into the reasons why some scholars made mistakes and where it originated from. Truly beneficial book and it will make you balanced and just in your judgements

But to suggest 6 books and 5/6L from 1 sheikh is clear cut programming.

Clear cut programming khulaha, warya go make your own thread with more books and benefit the world a little bit. I could care less about what you think is “programming”.

 

[Farax bin Cabdi bin Bakri]

A list of books to stay away from

Right because you know better than the scholars that have recommended the same books? On what basis should people stay away from it?