@Defendant People from Papua New Guinea are only 89-90% Homo Sapien (Human). I am not even joking. 2.5% Neanderthal + 7.5% Denisovan and probably 1% Floresiensis.
@Yonis
@Defendant People from Papua New Guinea are only 89-90% Homo Sapien (Human). I am not even joking. 2.5% Neanderthal + 7.5% Denisovan and probably 1% Floresiensis.
@Yonis
Damn, is that true or are making up crap? Because if it is true, that would explain a lot tbh.
All Eurasians have about 1.5-2.5% Neanderthal, just google it. East Asians, Amerindians and Oceanians generally have the highest levels a bit more than Europeans and Middle Easterners.
On top of that they also have Denisovan at the highest level google it.
Floriensis is speculative, but highly probably given that it lived near them and still hasn't been analyzed genomically.
I love reading your posts....always interestingAll Eurasians have about 1.5-2.5% Neanderthal, just google it. East Asians, Amerindians and Oceanians generally have the highest levels a bit more than Europeans and Middle Easterners.
On top of that Oceanians also have Denisovan at the highest level, google it.
Floriensis is speculative, but highly probably given that it lived near them and still hasn't been analyzed genomically.
@Emily
There are no rights for women in this hell hole called Papua New Guinea. To be seen as a brave man in society you should attack a woman.
![]()
0.8-1.2% Neanderthal cave beast.
But the frequency of Homo Sapien is highest in Horners and maybe some Nilotes.
These people are ugly as f*ck![]()
These people are ugly as f*ck![]()
So you're saying we are more human then cadaans and madows?0.8-1.2% Neanderthal cave beast.
But the frequency of Homo Sapien is highest in Horners and maybe some Nilotes.
TrueThat’s because they are poor.
If they lived in the West, sunscreen, make up, weave and flattering clothes would have turned them all in to dimes