Atatürk - Saudi Arabia: 10-0 👍

I don’t agree with using racist terms like turkroach. But you are right in saying that Arab civilizations were more impressive

This is how I rank the Middle East when it comes to who built the most impressive civilizations

1. Persians
2. Arabs
3. Turks

And not all Turks behave like the Twitter poster, or else an Islamist like Erdoğan wouldn’t have been in power for the last 20 years
 
Nah bro it’s common knowledge that Al-Khwarizmi was Persian. He was born as a Zoroastrian and didn’t convert to Islam until he was an adult

I know the Arabs made a lot of great contributions and built many great empires such as the Umayyads & Abbasids. Arabs have one of the most impressive histories in my opinion

But the truth is the Arabs needed the Persians not the other way around.

View attachment 309245

The Persians had over a thousand years of history before Islam. But if we’re being honest, the Arabs don’t have as much of an impressive pre Islamic history as the Persians do
I think brother, that there is a difference in his lineage There are many who say that he is Arab and some say that he is Persian. Regarding the second point, in general, positions were given to non-Arabs in the Umayyad and Abbasid eras, but there are conditions for accepting that, so he is (loyal), in other words, and another Arab must introduce him to the ruler. (By the way, I do not like such laws, and I have reservations about the Umayyads because of these matters. I see them as racist.) Regarding your last statement, frankly, I will agree with you, but they were not at the same time an ignorant society either. Rather, there were some kingdoms here that traded with the ancient world, but of course, the effect was not the same after Islam.
 

Dalac Bilaash

☠ Emperor of The Horn ☠
The salty cows & pigs like @Aseer, @lahaine, @Dalac Bilaash & others are on the losing side in this cultural war. Hence why they’re lashing out & posting nonsense because they’re trying to cope with the reality that…

1. Arabic is an Official language in Somalia.

2. More than 15% of people can speak Arabic & rising

3. We’re part of the Arab League & our closest relationships are with other Arab states.

4. Our Culture is Arabised.

:win:
İ am sure if you walk around Somalia you will never find anyone that can speak Arabic unless that person lived in Arabic speaking country for a while
 
I think brother, that there is a difference in his lineage There are many who say that he is Arab and some say that he is Persian. Regarding the second point, in general, positions were given to non-Arabs in the Umayyad and Abbasid eras, but there are conditions for accepting that, so he is (loyal), in other words, and another Arab must introduce him to the ruler. (By the way, I do not like such laws, and I have reservations about the Umayyads because of these matters. I see them as racist.) Regarding your last statement, frankly, I will agree with you, but they were not at the same time an ignorant society either. Rather, there were some kingdoms here that traded with the ancient world, but of course, the effect was not the same after Islam.
Yea I’m not the biggest fan of the Ummayyads due to their racism as well. They clearly were Arab supremacists. They even tried to prevent non Arabs from converting to Islam. Imo, the Abbasids were the best Arab civilization

The reason why Persians were given a lot of positions in both the Umayyad and Abbasid governments were due to the Persians having the superior style of governance. Persian bureaucracy was the reason why the Persians were able to build so many civilizations



Also I’m not anti-Arab I know that they had impressive history before Islam like with ancient Yemen or with the Nabateans. Also they say that poetry made during the Jahiliyyah was the best
 

Kizaru

Cast in the name of God Ye not Guilty
Stop defending the turks. This post reflects the deep hateful sentiments held by most turks towards the superior Arabs. 99% of turks worship/revere ataturk who was anti-Arab and Islam to the core.
his anti arab sentiment is pretty understandable. Imagine arabs claiming the ummah then listening to a bri'ish guy to destroy the only islamic empire at that time that could defend the lands resulting in turks loosing every territory they conqured and even resulting in a the recapture of istanbul by the british. Mainland turkey was humiliated. Idk how you dont expect turks to hate arabs when the biggest humiliation they suffered was catapulted by arabs.
 

GemState

36/21
VIP
Saudi Arabia is incredibly based.

Ibn Saud was a great monarch. Didn't fall for Arab nationalism or communism and built a genuine alternative model for governance that is able to absorb various cultures and nationalities.
 
his anti arab sentiment is pretty understandable. Imagine arabs claiming the ummah then listening to a bri'ish guy to destroy the only islamic empire at that time that could defend the lands
You're not literate with history. Turks were oppressing the Arabs for centuries, the grievances against the turkish occupiers did not come about in a vacuum.
 
Yea I’m not the biggest fan of the Ummayyads due to their racism as well. They clearly were Arab supremacists. They even tried to prevent non Arabs from converting to Islam. Imo, the Abbasids were the best Arab civilization

The reason why Persians were given a lot of positions in both the Umayyad and Abbasid governments were due to the Persians having the superior style of governance. Persian bureaucracy was . That’s why the Persians were able to build so many civilizations



Also I’m not anti-Arab I know that they had impressive history before Islam like with ancient Yemen or with the Nabateans. Also they say that poetry made during the Jahiliyyah was the best
Yes, it is true that they were nationalistic towards the Arabs, which led to the Berber revolutions that were against their rule, and it is not surprising that they only lasted for 90 years, so I like Abbasiya more. There was, for example, the possibility of having a person hold a non-Arab position, and there was no (loyalty) or Any of these racist laws, and for this reason their caliphate lasted longer than the Umayyads, and let us not forget how great this period was in terms of the scientific renaissance. All this is because they allowed non-Arabs to have an opinion and were not fanatical about their race.
 

Kizaru

Cast in the name of God Ye not Guilty
You're not literate with history. Turks were oppressing the Arabs for centuries, the grievances against the turkish occupiers did not come about in a vacuum.
which lead to more opression and death. Arabs couldve revolted earlier but only did it because of the chaos and worked with a even worse group of people to do it. Look at the modern day middle east. Carved by the british and french with endless war and death.
 
what happened?
Here's an article about it you'll find the details
 
Turkroach kissing the hand of his Arab Master :ftw9nwa:

GCmw1J9WoAAA2hr
 

Bazed

Tired.
VIP
It's easy to gas up the Turks just say something positive about Ataturk and they'll follow you like dogs. The glazing in the comments is insane 😂
Why is it that the most racist people are either south American or mixed. Bro is half Indonesian, he needs to stop talking like he's part to the team.


:russ:
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top