Any article about somalia *must* contain these key phrases

[bluebird]

Doesn’t matter if it’s good/bad/neutral

If it contains somalis or somalia it has to say something like “the fragile state” “war torn” “one of the poorest/dangerous/illiterate etc

I think we get it, do they have to rub it in our faces every time??

The article could be about anything not necessarily political but they go off on a tangent to make note of this point as if the world doesn’t already know they have to give an entire history lesson in their too . I think they just like to feel better about themselves sometimes lol because I’ve seen the poorest africans do this too

 

[VixR]

That’s normal and to-be-expected. It’s because its become a defining feature of the subject. Also, a synopsis is typical in journalism.

It’s the same with anything that has a long history of being static, like the Pali/Israeli conflict. The buzzwords for them are: two-state solution, ceasefire, terrorism/freedom fighters, Jerusalem/Gaza, settlements, IDF/Hamas.

 

[Abdalla]

What about 'hasn't had a stable government since 1991'

Or 'backed by African Union peacekeeping forces'

 

[Muji]

It should be the land of timo jilec and small noses

 

[bluebird]

That’s normal and to-be-expected. It’s because its become a defining feature of the subject. Also, a synopsis is typical in journalism.

It’s the same with anything that has a long history of being static, like the Pali/Israeli conflict. The buzzwords for them are: two-state solution, ceasefire, terrorism/freedom fighters, Jerusalem/Gaza, settlements, IDF/Hamas.

It makes sense but sometimes like I said it’s gratuitous like some kind of poverty . It could be about some somali child in minneapolis doing something and they’ll have to add in that unnecessary piece

 

[J-Rasta]

Doesn’t matter if it’s good/bad/neutral

If it contains somalis or somalia it has to say something like “the fragile state” “war torn” “one of the poorest/dangerous/illiterate etc

I think we get it, do they have to rub it in our faces every time??

The article could be about anything not necessarily political but they go off on a tangent to make note of this point as if the world doesn’t already know they have to give an entire history lesson in their too . I think they just like to feel better about themselves sometimes lol because I’ve seen the poorest africans do this too

I've mentioned it earlier in a recent post
how Westerners use these terms to degrade Somalia and Somalis, they want to break your spirits do not believe in their shit , these cunts just want to boost their miserable depressive morale feeling better about themselves when we all know Europeans are a miserable bunch

Somalia might be in a dire situation it is not a failed state we just have political s and coons ruining our image
Somalis are resilient people they have the highest Happiness Index two years ago and still rank Top 7

We are determined to salvage what's left with our sovereignty

I say this never let babylon break your spirits