Alt-righters say Minneapolis Somali police officers shooting of white woman is a terror attack

[Striker]

Noor's life matter.
It was an accident and he's innocent.....

There is a chance he is innocent. It was midnight and a lady calls the police reporting about sexual assault in an alley. Noor probably panicked and shot her without thinking.

Either way there is no dash cam so Allah knows what will happen

 

[Xooshdheere]

white cops shoot madow ppl daily, are they terrorists

 

[Axmed Xaji]

Axmed

I don't know if "I freaked out is a justification" because she was approaching the driver's side of the window and she wanted to talk to him. The driver saw her coming but Xaaji seef-la-bood on the other side of the car freaked out and shot her multiple times. For f*ck sake, he could have waited till he got a code word from his partner. Both cops had no car and body cam which is against the rules and now his dirty laundry is aired as a Rainbow type cop who is incapable of following rules and procedures.

Police officer facing two other complaints

Mr Noor was sued earlier this year after a May 25 incident in which he and other officers took a woman to the hospital on a mental health hold.

The lawsuit claims Mr Noor and the other officers violated the woman's rights when they entered her home without her permission and Mr Noor grabbed her wrist and upper arm.

Mr Noor relaxed his grip when the woman said she had a previous shoulder injury, the lawsuit says.

Television station KSTP reported that city records show Mr Noor had three complaints on file.

The station did not provide details on the nature of the complaints but said one was dismissed with no disciplinary action, while the other two were pending.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-...ta-policeman-had-two-years-experience/8717936

The complaint pending against him was also made against another two cops. Some crazy woman kept calling cops so they took her to a mental ward, which was appropriate. The law suit will be dismissed, I guarantee you. As for the body cams, there's no law that requires cops to wear them; it's just a department policy and at most both officers will get a talking to. There's a good chance the driver cop also freaked out when he saw the phone and that Noor was quicker to pull his gun out.

Either way, there's a good chance he gets charged with manslaughter like that cop that killed Philando Castille. If you remember, that cop beat the charge even though there's clear footage of the incident. All Noor and his partner will say is that "she reached for what we thought was a weapon", and that's it. I just don't know if a jury in Minneapolis will believe his story. They believe most cops, most of the time, even black ones.

 

[Xooshdheere]

>when all the whites now go all lives matter


>when they abandon blue lives matter

 

[Xooshdheere]

It's a terrible, needless loss; However the DM, as many other members of the media, failed to report that they were in an alley! and she ran up to the patrol cop without the officer's attention

 

[Nightline Kid]

So I guess we're blaming the victim now, huh?

 

[AussieHustler]

The complaint pending against him was also made against another two cops. Some crazy woman kept calling cops so they took her to a mental ward, which was appropriate. The law suit will be dismissed, I guarantee you. As for the body cams, there's no law that requires cops to wear them; it's just a department policy and at most both officers will get a talking to. There's a good chance the driver cop also freaked out when he saw the phone and that Noor was quicker to pull his gun out.

Either way, there's a good chance he gets charged with manslaughter like that cop that killed Philando Castille. If you remember, that cop beat the charge even though there's clear footage of the incident. All Noor and his partner will say is that "she reached for what we thought was a weapon", and that's it. I just don't know if a jury in Minneapolis will believe his story. They believe most cops, most of the time, even black ones.

Axmed

The body and car Dash cam is a requirement and requirements are rules. Lack of it and a fatality of this nature will worsen the defence of 'freaking out'.

In the United States city where Australian woman Justine Damond was killed, all police are required to wear body cameras. So why did the officer who shot her have his turned off?

Both police officer Mohamed Noor and his partner's body cameras were off, and their car's dashboard camera did not capture the moment Ms Damond was shot more than once, in her pyjamas and apparently unarmed, from the vehicle's passenger seat in a Minneapolis alley.

The officers were responding to a 911 call by Ms Damond, who reported hearing a possible assault in an alley behind her home.

Questions have been raised about why there was no police footage of the incident, with all Minneapolis officers required to wear body cameras since the end of 2016.

"I have the same question everyone else has: 'Why weren't the body cameras activated?'" Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges said.

Could officers face consequences for not turning cams on?

Ms Nelson called for consequences to be added to the policy "to ensure better compliance and accountability".

"These two officers should face penalties for breaking [the] policy … and making the truth so much harder to find," she said.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-18/justine-damond-why-was-mohamed-noors-body-cam-off/8721098

 

[NotMyL]

Apparently he thinks he can beat this, his attorney is super confident. Sadly I think they are mistaken and in for a rude awakening, they going to make him an example.

 

[Axmed Xaji]

Axmed

The body and car Dash cam is a requirement and requirements are rules. Lack of it and a fatality of this nature will worsen the defence of 'freaking out'.

In the United States city where Australian woman Justine Damond was killed, all police are required to wear body cameras. So why did the officer who shot her have his turned off?

Both police officer Mohamed Noor and his partner's body cameras were off, and their car's dashboard camera did not capture the moment Ms Damond was shot more than once, in her pyjamas and apparently unarmed, from the vehicle's passenger seat in a Minneapolis alley.

The officers were responding to a 911 call by Ms Damond, who reported hearing a possible assault in an alley behind her home.

Questions have been raised about why there was no police footage of the incident, with all Minneapolis officers required to wear body cameras since the end of 2016.

"I have the same question everyone else has: 'Why weren't the body cameras activated?'" Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges said.

Could officers face consequences for not turning cams on?

Ms Nelson called for consequences to be added to the policy "to ensure better compliance and accountability".

"These two officers should face penalties for breaking [the] policy … and making the truth so much harder to find," she said.


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-18/justine-damond-why-was-mohamed-noors-body-cam-off/8721098

No one thinks the cameras were turned off as part of a crime. It's a minor, procedural thing. No one is accusing either officer of turning off their cameras to cover up something. That will not be a significant part of a trial, if this even goes that far.

 

[AussieHustler]

So I guess we're blaming the victim now, huh?

FSMDOA

Aren't you?

Axmed and company are openly supporting the cop because he is Somali, but weren't you supporting him, at-least, subtly? I see you didn't mention the victim but you were concerned with the findings for Mohamed's sake. Justice and fairness demands one to take off the colourism biased glasses and see all involved as human-beings. Culturally, we Somalis were trained to stick up to one of us even if they are in th wrong, criminals, terrorists, mass murderers and rapists and that is how the clan with it's destructive forces still reigns supreme in our homelands. We lack the critical and individual thinking and see everything from a cluster viewpoint. An innocent lady is killed by a cop, the narrative should have been formed that way.

 

[AussieHustler]

No one thinks the cameras were turned off as part of a crime. It's a minor, procedural thing. No one is accusing either officer of turning off their cameras to cover up something. That will not be a significant part of a trial, if this even goes that far.

Axmed

No one is saying they turned off the cams because they wanted to commit a crime but they failed to follow procedures. If a doctor fails to follow procedures and the patient dies, there are consequences. The same here. Furthermore, the mayor whose office initiated these procedures and the police force comes under her command is asking these questions, do you know better than her?

 

[Axmed Xaji]

Axmed

No one is saying they turned off the cams because they wanted to commit a crime but they failed to follow procedures. If a doctor fails to follow procedures and the patient dies, there are consequences. The same here. Furthermore, the mayor whose office initiated these procedures and the police force comes under her command is asking these questions, do you know better than her?

I know. Still, an officer cannot be charged with turning off his/her camera. That's not in the legal statutes anywhere. He might get a suspension at worse.
The doctor analogy makes no sense because her death had nothing to do with the cameras. It would be insane to suggest that they turned off their cameras for nefarious reasons.

 

[Axmed Xaji]

Axmed

No one is saying they turned off the cams because they wanted to commit a crime but they failed to follow procedures. If a doctor fails to follow procedures and the patient dies, there are consequences. The same here. Furthermore, the mayor whose office initiated these procedures and the police force comes under her command is asking these questions, do you know better than her?

A better analogy is if a patient dies under a doctor's control and it turns out the doctor showed up late for work that day or didn't record his work hours properly.

 

[AussieHustler]

I know. Still, an officer cannot be charged with turning off his/her camera. That's not in the legal statutes anywhere. He might get a suspension at worse.
The doctor analogy makes no sense because her death had nothing to do with the cameras. It would be insane to suggest that they turned off their cameras for nefarious reasons.

Axmed

The turned off cams will disadvantage their defence and illuminate their negligence and both men and in particular Mohamed could be indicted for manslaughter. The case is already being investigated as homicide.

 

[Nightline Kid]

FSMDOA

Aren't you?

Axmed and company are openly supporting the cop because he is Somali, but weren't you supporting him, at-least, subtly? I see you didn't mention the victim but you were concerned with the findings for Asmed's sake. Justice and fairness demands one to take off the colourism biased glasses and see all involved as human-beings. Culturally, we Somalis were trained to stick up to one of us even if they are in th wrong, criminals, terrorists, mass murderers and rapists and that is how the clan with it's destructive forces still reigns supreme in our homelands. We lack the critical and individual thinking and see everything from a cluster viewpoint. An innocent lady is killed by a cop, the narrative should have been formed that way.

Read through my posts again. The way it's
supposed to go is that if a police officer uses unwarranted brute force on someone who didn't deserve it, like if they were unarmed, he should be held accountable for his actions. But time and time again police officers have been acquitted for murdering unarmed African-American men, be it in cases like Eric Garner or Freddie Gray. The victim in this case was an unarmed foreign white woman from a country that is strongly allied with the United States, Officer Noor is going to be punished solely because of that. If the victim was African-American or Somali than Noor would probably have a much higher chance of being acquitted, which is wrong. What I'm trying to say is that the law should be colorblind but it clearly isn't, and Noor is going to be punished while others got off scot-free.

Let me put it more simply, let's say that things are how they seem and a police officer shot and killed an unarmed civilian who called the police for help. If Noor is acquitted that shows the justice system refuses to hold police officers accountable for their actions, and that's bad. If Noor is arrested that shows that the justice system is racist and that he was charged because of the victim's race, and that's bad.

 

[Axmed Xaji]

Axmed

The turned off cams will disadvantage their defence and illuminate their negligence and both men and in particular Mohamed could be indicted for manslaughter. The case is already being investigated as homicide.

All police shootings are investigated as a homicide in the beginning. If there's reason to believe the cameras had something to do with the shooting, they're in a lot of trouble. There's a good chance that neither Noor or the other officer gets indicted.

 

[Bohol]

Over 1k calaacal comments from cadaans at dailymail.


Australian woman died single shot abdomen
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4707192/Australian-woman-died-single-shot-abdomen.html

 

[Grigori Rasputin]

Blue lives matter fb group has made its stands clear and that they're only for WHITE POLICE

Here is the comments over there :

Here are a few tid bits

"Christian cops are great people but your pathetic for standing up for this particular cop he is disgusting and needs to be in jail the rest of his life."

"It was a somolian police officer that shot her."

"I have all the facts I need to declare with 99% certainty the cop fucked up most likely just incompetent but not nefarious, unless you count the city hiring 3rd world peasant morons for a job that requires an advanced skill set and solid personality."

All from a single reply thread in the Blue Lives Matter page.

 

[Grigori Rasputin]

"Officer Noor isn't one of the good cops, he's the bad apple in the tree , we were looking to get him off the force months ago "

Where did you get this from?

 

[AussieHustler]

FSMDOA

There is a judicial system and it is based on complex laws and this requires persuasions through it's interpretation by highly skilled lawyers who cauld present different theories assisted by highly paid experts in many fields. This requires one to be very wealthy to afford to hire these skilled lawyers and beat the system. One who successfully did that is OJ Simpson. Most of those killed are poor blacks, if they were poor white people, their fate would have been the same. But this woman is different. She comes from an affluent Australian family, her profession in Australia was a veterinary surgeon and married into a middle class well educated family. That's why Noor's case will be influenced by the wealth and connections of the family. They will exert every pressure to make him accountable for their loved one's death. This case might set a precedence in Ohio courts about cops killing civilians. This woman's case might help cops be prosecuted and jailed for the killings of innocent civilians. But I'm afraid, Noor will be the fall guy.