Afro-Asiatic Language Homeland

[DR OSMAN]

While there is no consensus among historical linguists concerning the original homeland of the Afroasiatic family or the period when the parent language (i.e. Proto-Afroasiatic) was spoken, most agree that it was located within a region of Northeast Africa. Proposed specific locations include the Horn of Africa, Egypt, the eastern Sahara, and the Levant.

These linguists are simply in denial and hateful of Africa, they can simply find the most 'primitive' form of afro-asiatic language as that will be closer to the root, I say that becuz if the language is already complex, it must have primitive roots as it can't work the other way around complex to primitive. From a primitive root u can follow it as it develops across the globe into complexity. An adult can't be an adult if he didn't start as a baby right? language origins can be pin-pointed using the same model.

Where u guys think the homeland of all mid-eastern n north-east africa language is and provide ur reasoning model.

 

[DR OSMAN]

I suspect the Horn is the location but which language is the oldest n most primitive is most likely the origin for all afro-asiatic. Who-ever is the homeland is the father of mid-east n ancient egypt knowledge as the language is what creates knowledge.

So whoever the origin is, it would be recognized as fathering all hebrews-arabs-ancient egypt-even ancient iraq languages and thus can claim their civilizations. U see how 'slimey' these white academics are about it's origin being unknown they know the implication of race pride? but they get away with it and no-one calls them out on reason n intellect in africa.

 

[Africanus]

I suspect the Horn is the location but which language is the oldest n most primitive is most likely the origin for all afro-asiatic. Who-ever is the homeland is the father of mid-east n ancient egypt knowledge as the language is what creates knowledge.

So whoever the origin is, it would be recognized as fathering all hebrews-arabs-ancient egypt-even ancient iraq languages and thus can claim their civilizations. U see how 'slimey' these white academics are about it's origin being unknown they know the implication of race pride? but they get away with it and no-one calls them out on reason n intellect in africa.

The Horn of Africa was the origin of the Afro-Asiatic languages and genetics. Viva Horn Africa!!

 

[DR OSMAN]

The Horn of Africa was the origin of the Afro-Asiatic languages and genetics. Viva Horn Africa!!
View attachment 255608

I suspect the horn also cause it has primitive languages inside it plus it's the most diverse cushitic n semetic co-exist showing a common proto type must of fathered it somewhere locally. U won't see that mix of both families in the levant or even north africa(ancient times).

Maybe egypt/sudan could be a contender as 'beja' a cushitic language lives there, but that wud need to assume ancient egyptian was semetic which I strongly doubt, later non egyptians arrived like persia that would've influenced the language. Berber exists by itself and no other afro asiatic language, so i rule them out. I dont include arabic that came 7th century or greek or roman or persian.

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus the ancient egyptians(early period up untill puntish period) paint themselves like ancient puntites not ppl from persia, nilotics, levant as their clearly white. So how did a darkish/reddish race of ppl start speaking semetic is doubtful, they may have spoken ancient egyptian tongue on it's own branch, but it's related brother tongue is other languages in the continent, some say it's related to berber and berber is dna wise somalis showing the berbers must of been invaded and turned white n took a black-reddish berber tongue for themselves but they were not reddish black in the painting either

 

[Africanus]

@Africanus the ancient egyptians(early period up untill puntish period) paint themselves like ancient puntites not ppl from persia, nilotics, levant as their clearly white. So how did a darkish/reddish race of ppl start speaking semetic is doubtful, they may have spoken ancient egyptian tongue on it's own branch, but it's related brother tongue is other languages in the continent, some say it's related to berber and berber is dna wise somalis showing the berbers must of been invaded and turned white n took a black-reddish berber tongue for themselves but they were not reddish black in the painting either

I say Puntites and Egyptians were close culturally and probably intermarried with one another for political reasons. As for their language.. they probably had some extinct Afro Asiatic language.

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus historians have an emotional bias since this is a very important topic the homeland of civilization, yes ancient iraq did exist, but we were all connected to there untill we all left due to wars, diseasee, climate change becuz the neolithic stage oldest root is found there, so i doubt we independently developed farming/livestock rearing/metals from each other, so a common origin is needed.

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus the oldest mummy was found in libyan desert, remember the continent was fertile before climate change then. The mummy is oldest mummy and it's not ancient egypt who found mummification but black people. Im just interested in the language they spoke as that will tell us much more then their color, as knowledge is thru language.

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus it's also possible back in those days, indo-europeans didn't exist as the bible doesnt mention their existence, maybe a wave of ancient blacks went there to export knowledge like they did for neaderthals or the moors did for spain(mali timbuktu science n math libraries)

 

[Africanus]

@Africanus it's also possible back in those days, indo-europeans didn't exist as the bible doesnt mention their existence, maybe a wave of ancient blacks went there to export knowledge like they did for neaderthals or the moors did for spain(mali timbuktu science n math libraries)

If I remember correctly, there was an old thread talking about Greeks having a small bit of Hamitic bloodline (probably North African) and they were described as “dark whites” aka Melanochroi

On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind (1870)

 

[DR OSMAN]

If I remember correctly, there was an old thread talking about Greeks having a small bit of Hamitic bloodline (probably North African) and they were described as “dark whites” aka Melanochroi

On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind (1870)

Possibly ancient blacks went into greece and bred with neaderthal to create them, but the problem is neaderthal is said to have gone extinct 40,000 years ago. Maybe they did exist as modern humans physically by then, but knowledge wise still neaderthal. But i read the early bible, the greeks r mentioned much later, they weren't around in moses time civilization wise. Plus it dismisses them as pagans non circumized. Maybe circumision was a way to demontrate u knew 'god' and were not 'primitive neaderthal'

 

[Africanus]

Possibly ancient blacks went into greece and bred with neaderthal to create them, but the problem is neaderthal is said to have gone extinct 40,000 years ago. Maybe they did exist as modern humans physically by then, but knowledge wise still neaderthal. But i read the early bible, the greeks r mentioned much later, they weren't around in moses time civilization wise.

I’m guessing Indo-Europeans were already there and Hamitics in North Africa interacted with them and they simply carried some of their lineage. But the Northern Europeans simply mixed among themselves and were primitive and didn’t have any special civilizations yet. Which is probably why the Southerners look more “darker” compared to northerns

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus notice whites war on female circumision, and how its brutal, they don' want u to know your women were the same as men circumized and knew god, not nijaaz impure like semetic women n indo european even worse bro both r uncircumised they didnt know god back then, no wonder the ancient jews married from the continent

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus I cant help it but when i see a woman 'mangled parts hanging out' I am sickened, it must be genetic i cant 'reteach myself' to not do it

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus u shud read the bible for history as islam would've said, cuz the quran is about god not history, its one of the oldest books that is around but also balance the history with archaelogy, languages, cultures to see if its true.

 

[Africanus]

@Africanus u shud read the bible for history as islam would've said, cuz the quran is about god not history, its one of the oldest books that is around but also balance the history with archaelogy, languages, cultures to see if its true.

I agree. It provides hidden history of things we did not know about if we looked at it through a religious view. For example, Nebuchadnezzar II and his Neo-Babylonian Empire conquering Jerusalem and enslaving the Jews wouldn’t have been known about were it not for the Talmud and Bible..

 

[DR OSMAN]

@Africanus circumision didnt just signify for marriage, it separated ppl from apes literally. Aborigines worship ancestors n nature, their not aware of a 'god' or higher power, the world mustve been like that untill the advent of religion.

 

[Africanus]

@Africanus circumision didnt just signify for marriage, it separated ppl from apes literally. Aborigines worship ancestors n nature, their not aware of a 'god' or higher power, the world mustve been like that untill the advent of religion.

Is that so? I thought it separated between non believers and believers of the One true god?

 

[DR OSMAN]

Is that so? I thought it separated between non believers and believers of the One true god?

Well non believers must of been seen like aborigines not yet 'aware' and down to material things(idols, sun, moon, fire, ancestors, nature) as the word hasn't reached them