A Thread On Twitter Trending That Sadly Can't Be Debunked

I don't know about you saying Africans preferred peacefulness and foraging + farming though, that's clearly false and biased on your part.
asides from west african kingdoms, there has been little development in africa

for example, the africans living in the congo lived on top of immense natural resources. Had they wanted to conquer land, they would've easily been able to use it to their advantage. Tons of gold, rubber, iron, etc was easily acessible with just basic tools

but they were contempt living tribal life in the jungle, so they never advanced

also madagascar was right next to where bantus lived, yet the first people to arrive there were somalis and indonesian traders
 
Is this a joke ? Never heard of Minoans/myceneans ? Persians literally got humiliated while they had much bigger armies and ressources and later greeks went as far as India.

They didn't have substantial level of Mena ancestry you project the current profiles onto the ancient ones. People like minoans/myceneans had far less MENA ancestry and were similar to modern north italians. Republican romans too were similar to northern iberians while the later decadent imperial romans saw a shift towards the east med due to the massive influx of east med slaves. Scandinavia was barely inhabited lol extremely low demography that's not comparable but now as you can see those "savage" north euros are performing better than any nation and all of this is degraded by immigrants.

as for Ashkenazi Jews :







so why is it crazy to think that europeans produce more intelligent individuals than other ethnicities ?
Africa was barely inhabited as well, at the beginning of the 20th century we were just above 100m which is crazy low for such a long inhabited place with agricultural populations :comeon:

to this day its population is very sparse for a continent of that size, even tiny Europe outnumbered us up till recently . Not to mention each group was very distanced physically from each other (which would severely limit trade and exchange of ideas that occupying a smaller continent would)

Such simplistic arguments you and the other males in here keep giving

so strange to see men licking other men’s assholes so shamelessly, im used to seeing females do that - the decline in masculinity is real :susp:
 
Africa was barely inhabited as well, at the beginning of the 20th century we were just above 100m which is crazy low for such a long inhabited place with agricultural populations :comeon:

to this day its population is very sparse for a continent of that size, even tiny Europe outnumbered us up till recently . Not to mention each group was very distanced physically from each other (which would severely limit trade and exchange of ideas that occupying a smaller continent would)

Such simplistic arguments you and the other males in here keep giving

so strange to see men licking other men’s assholes so shamelessly, im used to seeing females do that - the decline in masculinity is real :susp:
reminder that when we say "africans werent developed" were talking about bantus, not somalis

the horn of africa always had connection to the rest of the world via the indian ocean and red sea

and refer to my arguments above. population and geography have little to do with a races innovation. competition is what causes adaptation
 

Erythrean

🇺🇸 PROUD MURICAN!!! Hamitic Horner Race
Somali history is either lauded as something that rivals the likes of ancient china or Rome or “Muh camel herders” here and it’s the funniest amount of cognitive dissonance here
Who’s comparing our history to China and Rome? Do you have some inferiority complex? Our history is greater than most so I can be proud of that.
 
Who’s comparing our history to China and Rome? Do you have some inferiority complex? Our history is greater than most so I can be proud of that.
On here people here act like city states are as powerful as the mongol, Roman Empire and in another sentence will roast Somalia for being worse off than the likes of “Madow” Kenya and other Africans
 

Erythrean

🇺🇸 PROUD MURICAN!!! Hamitic Horner Race
On here people here act like city states are as powerful as the mongol, Roman Empire and in another sentence will roast Somalia for being worse off than the likes of “Madow” Kenya and other Africans
70503EFC-51D3-44FC-A59C-32F948C73E5B.png
You sound so ret@rded that I’m not gonna even try get sucked into your BS.
 
Certain groups may be an exception, but Africans by and large are not less docile.



Not true; Africans would have nothing today if African-Americans didn't courageously stand up and assert the rights that all black people eventually benefited from.
True, the civil rights movement helped lots of people
 

tyrannicalmanager

pseudo-intellectual
it's true White people made groundbreaking scientific progress for the last 300 years but that doesn't make them inherently superior. the same way ancient chinese aren't inherently superior to Northwestern Europeans.

what makes a person inferior is to have defeatist attitude when they see the accomplishments of others.
 
Last edited:
Africa was barely inhabited as well, at the beginning of the 20th century we were just above 100m which is crazy low for such a long inhabited place with agricultural populations :comeon:

to this day its population is very sparse for a continent of that size, even tiny Europe outnumbered us up till recently . Not to mention each group was very distanced physically from each other (which would severely limit trade and exchange of ideas that occupying a smaller continent would)

Such simplistic arguments you and the other males in here keep giving

so strange to see men licking other men’s assholes so shamelessly, im used to seeing females do that - the decline in masculinity is real :susp:
calm yourself I was only partially serious I just don't buy the idea that all human groups are equals when it comes to intellectual capabilities and ashkenazi jews are a good example of this of course it hurts the ego of some so they end up making all kinds of mental gymnastics and pretend all groups faced the same kind of pressures.

More than a third of the variance in SAT scores can now be predicted by factors known at students’ birth, up from a quarter of the variance in 1994. Of those factors, moreover, race has become the strongest predictor. Rather than declining in salience, race and ethnicity are now more important than either family income or parental education in accounting for test score differences. It must be cautioned that these findings are preliminary, and more research is needed to determine whether the California data reflect a broader national trend.

 
Last edited:
Right, you do realise that the distance between Greeco-Roman civilizations and the ancient civilizations of the Middle-East and North Africa is the same distance between our time and Rome?

Did you expect them to stay on top forever? Civilizations rise, expand, decay, decline and fall.
The Ancient Greek city-states were more or less contemporary with the Achaemenid Empire (first Persian empire). The latter group had huge advantages against the Greeks in military and economic resources and yet they basically failed to conquer the Greeks, they were in fact repelled in their first (490 BC) and second invasions (480-479 BC) of Greece and were later on crushed by the Macedonian Alexander the Great a century later.

The reasons for the Persians failed campaigns against the Greeks were diverse but to simplify it their military methods and style of fighting was badly matched to Greeks of the time period. The Achaemenid military was designed to fight in the Asiatic style and to dominate similar Asian armies in the region, the Ancient Greeks with their heavily-armored & better-equipped hoplites in a tight phalanx formation had a better chance of routing a Persian army. The Greeks simply just outmaneuvered and fought more better than the Persians, that's it.

By the time King Alexander III of Macedon invaded the Persian empire in 334 BC, it had sort of declined by then and was surpassed by the various Greek city-states militarily. The Persians were by that time actually using Greek hoplites as mercenary soldiers in their own army because of how effective and disciplined they were.
 
to this day its population is very sparse for a continent of that size, even tiny Europe outnumbered us up till recently . Not to mention each group was very distanced physically from each other (which would severely limit trade and exchange of ideas that occupying a smaller continent would)

Such simplistic arguments you and the other males in here keep giving.
Yes, you made a very good point regarding this issue. Finally a comment I can actually agree with you on! @HIBAQ123

Simon Cowell Wow GIF by America's Got Talent
 
calm yourself I was only partially serious I just don't buy the idea that all human groups are equals when it comes to intellectual capabilities and ashkenazi jews are a good example of this of course it hurts the ego of some so they end up making all kinds of mental gymnastics and pretend all groups faced the same kind of pressures.



Yeah, one scientific paper based on preliminary findings coming from the State of Californication is supposed to convince me that Jews are a super race.

What The Wtf GIF by MOODMAN
 
Top