You left your religion because of a Book written by a White cracker?! You're an idiot.View attachment 44640
Philosophy of Religion: an introduction by William L. Rowe
Chapter 7, page 120. It talks about a pointless evil. A fawn has been horribly burned by fire caused by a lightning strike, it suffers terribly for five days before it finally dies. Why would a merciful god permit that fawn's terrible suffering? I couldn't answer nor find a satisfying answer to this puzzling question. Because of this, my faith in Islam crumbled and I became non-religious.
Keep that passion for when you're an imam. It might not convince your audience, but it will keep them entertained.You left your religion because of a Book written by a White cracker?! You're an idiot.
The Alchemist
I loved the idea that spirituality is important in order to live a satisfying life
View attachment 44640
Philosophy of Religion: an introduction by William L. Rowe
Chapter 7, page 120. It talks about a pointless evil. A fawn has been horribly burned by fire caused by a lightning strike, it suffers terribly for five days before it finally dies. Why would a merciful god permit that fawn's terrible suffering? I couldn't answer nor find a satisfying answer to this puzzling question. Because of this, my faith in Islam crumbled and I became non-religious.
Yet you believed him without evidenceI wouldn't say it changed my perspective but it was a good read recently.
It's called "The Ethics of Belief and other Essays" by a 19th century philosopher called William Kingdon Clifford.
According to him people have what he calls an epistemic responsibility to not believe things without evidence. I recommend it to Muslims.
Would you look at that! You're finally talking to me again without mindless spamming irrelevant quotes. I thought I broke your brain with that ayat I gave you.Yet you believed him without evidence
Yet you adopted it simply because it was validated by the white prophets of your dajjalic religionWould you look at that! You're finally talking to me again without mindless spamming irrelevant quotes. I thought I broke your brain with that ayat I gave you.
It's a philosophical perspective (having epistemic responsibility), not a claim about the nature of the universe in any way. You have no obligation to adopt it. The same way you technically don't have an obligation to be rational in general. It is an interesting read that will make unskeptical people start thinking.
Are you saying you don't have epistemic responsibility? Literally all it means is believing in only things you have evidence for.Yet you adopted it simply because it was validated by the white prophets of your dajjalic religion
(Sahih International)Are you saying you don't have epistemic responsibility? Literally all it means is believing in only things you have evidence for.