Shameless ass niggas, dude sounds like shabaab
There only reason for existing is shitting on muslims and trying to become like europeansWhy would Atheist Turks(the name of the sub reddit) care about one Ummah?
How about geeljire spot: shits on whites, brown, black and everything in betweenRace shitting hierarchy
Whites shit on: browns horners bantus
Browns shit on: horners bantus
Horners shit on: bantus
Bantus shit on: no one
We need to move up to #2 spot
Because it is an idealistic pov that is mostly promoted by brain-dead individuals (you know who) who have an inferiority complex when it comes to Arabs. Even if you forget about that part for one second, where is the ummah when it turns a blind eye to the atrocities happening to the uyghur muslims but yeah lets put up a hashtag and say ban products from France lmao yet their country is deep in business with the Chinese. Let's not forget Somalis bootyclapping for arab causes e.g Palestine. Yet you ask them hey perhaps we should focus on the droughts back home and sort out our own mess first (Al kebab) and they dont even have a clue.Your thread doesn't make sense. Of course an atheist is going to mock the idea, they're not Muslim and many on the that sub-reddit are against Islam.
But my question is, why as a Muslim, would you mock the idea of one Ummah? Right now, the one Ummah idea isn't possible, but why look down on something that the Prophet s.a.w advocated?
If Iranians are white, why are Arabs not white as well? Both groups are Middle Eastern and are of similar complexions. In fact, a Syrian on average is lighter than an Iranian.The latest stage of Islamic empire was a white empire controlled and lead by Turks and Iranians who are white people. So this Ummah he is talking about is a white Ummah, the early stage Islamic empire was Arab and African who were related tribes both genetically and linguistically.
If I dumb it down for the brudda, the Ottomans were Turks, the Abasid were Iranians, the Ummayad and the Rashidun were the original.
the Iranians are Indo-European(white) while the Arabs are Afro-asiatic(Black)If Iranians are white, why are Arabs not white as well? Both groups are Middle Eastern and are of similar complexions. In fact, a Syrian on average is lighter than an Iranian.
Indo-European is a the language group. Even Indian and Urdo are Indo-European as well. Are Indians white?the Iranians are Indo-European(white) while the Arabs are Afro-asiatic(Black)
What irks you is the term black, and while its true the Afro-asiatic would not consider themselves black but rather consider the nilotic black, in todays time and on this Germanic definition of race, they are black.
North Indians are white because they are indo-europeans while the southern Indians are black because they are Dravidians.Indo-European is a the language group. Even Indian and Urdo are Indo-European as well. Are Indians white?
Reminds me of this architecture firm based in Somalia doing projects in MalaysiaSomalis would build other people houses rather then their own
We're suffering from an identity crisisReminds me of this architecture firm based in Somalia doing projects in Malaysia