*One has to go through 100 years of war before one can form a country.
*Ajuuraan and whatever the others called were not nation states (if you don't know the history of ajuuraan then Please ask to be thought don't disrespect that which you have no knowledge of.)
*European countries are success African countries are failures.(European countries are better off due to stealing from the countries you are shaming) ..besides there are plenty countries that have not been around for more than 100 years that are more advanced than your so called succesful countries..
*Having different types of people sharing a nation is unviable..( then why are the western countries taking 100.000s of immigrants every year from other countries?
You are too much influenced by western standards of wht a nation should be and what it shouldn't be..
My last answer for you:
Never said a state has to have 100 years wars. I i said that this normal for almost every new country and why should somalia different. Proof me that this statement is wrong ???
1) We know nothing about Ajuuran we were talking about the failure of the Somali nation between 1960-1991. How could some bring up Ajuraan ? that doesn't make sense at all
2)You are living in one of those western counties, because they succeeded in nation building or i am wrong ? Why are all these somalis refugees coming to the western world and leaving their home and risking their live ? Simple Answer because in this western countries there are institutions like independents courts, a functioning police force, a education system on high standards, medical institutions. The individual rights are protected on very high level. Secondly they have countless economic opportunities for the individual. This are facts why are u arguing to prove your senseless points ?? Millions of people are flee from their countries to come into this western world like your and my family.
Tell this countries who randomly became success Storys and are better than these westeners ? i challenge you to even metion a few.
3) Never said that. I said Somalis or african never agreed on their borders in other words the african tribes and ethnics were forced to join in to a new state without them having any choice. Ya Ilahi yaqaan.. whats has this to with Europeans taking refugees ?
4) The definition of a state has nothing to with westerners, statehood is defined in many different sciences and i gave you a simplistic definition in law. you are arguing like typical somali from the makhayad with no arguments just childish accusations......"Isaaq Victimization", "influeced by westerns" and bla bla
I don't like the western world i just stated some facts. We were talking about Statehood and in that they succeeded like non others in the past 200 to 300 years. But their morals are shi'***t. We are muslims and in fact i said there is only a singe state in history of humanity which was built of nothing during 23 years and it was the prophet Mohammed SCW and the Islamic State. Justice, state Institutions, building of an islamic identity rather than clan identity is all something our Prophet SCW began.
