Is Ethiopia’s disintegration an inevitable and necessary evil?

Potential harms of disintegration must be weighed against consequences of holding Ethiopia together by force. Ethiopia is a failing state rapidly rushing toward disintegration.

[ ... ]
Ethiopia was created as a dependent colonial empire with the assistance of European imperial powers in multipronged wars of conquest waged by Emperor Menelik II in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.



EtMap.png

Status quo
Since Abiy came to power in 2018, multipronged wars have once again erupted between the Ethiopian state and its constituent nations, namely Tigray, Oromia, and Amhara, even with the help of a foreign, bloodthirsty antagonist, Eritrea, in Tigray.

The ongoing hidden war in Oromia was reenergized in 2018 within months of Abiy being named prime minister by the then-ruling party, the Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF).

The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), as the senior party in the EPRDF coalition, was forced to accept a new prime minister from a junior member, the Oromo People’s Democratic Organization (OPDO), due to the unrelenting struggle of the Oromo youth—known as Qeerroo/Qarree.

The new government quickly turned against the Oromo popular movement and denied the protesters’ demands. It adopted mass killing and imprisonment while systematically dismantling their peaceful struggle, effectively forcing many of them to join the armed resistance led by the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA).

When its attempts to obliterate the OLA failed, the Abiy regime turned to a state-sanctioned policy of “drying the pond to kill the fish.” It deployed the federal and regional security forces, Amhara and Oromo militias, and local settler Amhara groups in Oromia to loot, rape, and kill at will.

In the meantime, Abiy demolished the ruling party and formed a new party in 2019, the Prosperity Party, to promote his imperial ambition in the mold of emperors Menelik II and Haile Selassie I.

Peaceful disintegration?
Ethiopia is at a crossroads and the roads all lead to disintegration. The only real unknown is whether this results from multiple future bloody civil wars or is done through a negotiated orderly breaking apart supported by international actors.

Et02.png


Since the 1980s, the world has seen the birth of new nations. The breakup of the former Yugoslavia was an extraordinarily violent affair that dragged on throughout the 1990s, while Eritrea and South Sudan only became independent following decades of civil war.

The consequences of how these countries were created include simmering tensions in the former Yugoslavia, political instability, intercommunal conflict, and civil wars in Sudan and South Sudan, the Ethio-Eritrean war from 1998-2000, and Eritrea’s devastating participation in Ethiopia’s most recent civil war.

On the other hand, the splitting apart of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union was accomplished through a negotiated and peaceful breakaway. Regions like Quebec in Canada have also peacefully held referendums on the question of secession.

The question is whether the Ethiopian regime and its Western allies are willing to avoid a violent disintegration that costs millions of lives, destroys the meager regional economy, destabilizes the region, and leads to chaotic mass migration.

 
Last edited:
Conditions are rather precarious, political or otherwise, the West is not paying attention to .Et, is being caught up in two other wars, and may not have resources to rescue their Christian base this time round. There is no apparent saviour, like Carter then, to step up.
 
Potential harms of disintegration must be weighed against consequences of holding Ethiopia together by force. Ethiopia is a failing state rapidly rushing toward disintegration.

[ ... ]
Ethiopia was created as a dependent colonial empire with the assistance of European imperial powers in multipronged wars of conquest waged by Emperor Menelik II in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.



View attachment 313549
Status quo
Since Abiy came to power in 2018, multipronged wars have once again erupted between the Ethiopian state and its constituent nations, namely Tigray, Oromia, and Amhara, even with the help of a foreign, bloodthirsty antagonist, Eritrea, in Tigray.

The ongoing hidden war in Oromia was reenergized in 2018 within months of Abiy being named prime minister by the then-ruling party, the Ethiopian Peoples’ Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF).

The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), as the senior party in the EPRDF coalition, was forced to accept a new prime minister from a junior member, the Oromo People’s Democratic Organization (OPDO), due to the unrelenting struggle of the Oromo youth—known as Qeerroo/Qarree.

The new government quickly turned against the Oromo popular movement and denied the protesters’ demands. It adopted mass killing and imprisonment while systematically dismantling their peaceful struggle, effectively forcing many of them to join the armed resistance led by the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA).

When its attempts to obliterate the OLA failed, the Abiy regime turned to a state-sanctioned policy of “drying the pond to kill the fish.” It deployed the federal and regional security forces, Amhara and Oromo militias, and local settler Amhara groups in Oromia to loot, rape, and kill at will.

In the meantime, Abiy demolished the ruling party and formed a new party in 2019, the Prosperity Party, to promote his imperial ambition in the mold of emperors Menelik II and Haile Selassie I.

Peaceful disintegration?
Ethiopia is at a crossroads and the roads all lead to disintegration. The only real unknown is whether this results from multiple future bloody civil wars or is done through a negotiated orderly breaking apart supported by international actors.

View attachment 313550

Since the 1980s, the world has seen the birth of new nations. The breakup of the former Yugoslavia was an extraordinarily violent affair that dragged on throughout the 1990s, while Eritrea and South Sudan only became independent following decades of civil war.

The consequences of how these countries were created include simmering tensions in the former Yugoslavia, political instability, intercommunal conflict, and civil wars in Sudan and South Sudan, the Ethio-Eritrean war from 1998-2000, and Eritrea’s devastating participation in Ethiopia’s most recent civil war.

On the other hand, the splitting apart of Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union was accomplished through a negotiated and peaceful breakaway. Regions like Quebec in Canada have also peacefully held referendums on the question of secession.

The question is whether the Ethiopian regime and its Western allies are willing to avoid a violent disintegration that costs millions of lives, destroys the meager regional economy, destabilizes the region, and leads to chaotic mass migration.

This is the true map of somaligalbed before oromo migrations and fake tplf borders
Bale and hararghe is ours ☝️🇸🇴
IMG_1406.jpeg
 

johnsepei5

Head of Somalia freemasonry branch
If somalia had a bigger population it would have never been allowed to collapse the west would have done alot more than just 2 blackhawks
 
Last edited:
I think it was more to do with our natural disposition of being egalitarians, and history of not bowing nor kowtowing to the European overlords, which sealed our fate. Small population footprint might have been one of many factors incl. our being Muslims.
 
Last edited:
This damned country will never disintegrate. They have gone through worse days
I believe this time is different. In Article 39 of their current constitution, every ethnic group has the right to secede from the country. This means that unlike with their previous civil wars there now is a legal basis that allows for the different ethnic groups to get their independence
 

Aseer

A man without a 🐫 won't be praised in afterlife
VIP
I believe this time is different. In Article 39 of their current constitution, every ethnic group has the right to secede from the country. This means that unlike with their previous civil wars there now is a legal basis that allows for the different ethnic groups to get their independence
Abiye is trying to get rid of that.
 

mohammdov

Hansare Iyo baarsare
I believe this time is different. In Article 39 of their current constitution, every ethnic group has the right to secede from the country. This means that unlike with their previous civil wars there now is a legal basis that allows for the different ethnic groups to get their independence
Ethiopia is not Canada and Britain
government will not accept this
 
Ethiopia is not Canada and Britain
government will not accept this
It doesn’t matter what Ethiopia accepts, what matters is what the west will accept. If a civil war happens and K5 requests to be independent, it has a legal basis for doing so which can convince the western countries into supporting it. If Somalia had a clause like that in its constitution, you’d probably have gotten your recognition by now
 
This is why we need their civil war to happen before he does
:trumpsmirk:
@GaradShabeel What’s the likelihood that Abiye will be able to get rid of Article 39? Do you think he’ll face considerable pushback? Are their states/ethnicities that support Article 39 more than others?

As evident, Abiy isn’t a big supporter of the right of self-determination. It goes against his vision of a might Ethiopia dominated by Addis. However, given the recent troubles and the ongoing issues in the country, it’s unlikely that Abiy will open another can worm in the near future. Otherwise, he may be begging for his own demise.

Amharas have always been categorically against that clause. Their fellow Ethiopianist (mostly minorities) have been empowered and given more power, thanks to the right of self-determination, so I think some of them do reconcile being a nationalist with retaining that law to some extent.

Oromos may be Abiy current support base as he’s pandering to them, but many of them support article 39. This is despite them being fine with some do Abiy’s centralization of power (to Oromos) and furthering their own agenda. Alliances are not permanent in Ethiopia after all, so their position isn’t surprising.

Somalis wouldn’t entertain such a reform, but we don’t have much power or say in the federal arena, besides Abiy’s allies. Tigrayans are totally against it too and they will surely will pushback. What’s interesting is that despite the Tigrayan administration being installed by Abiy, they won’t hesitate to express their displeasure with the gov’t.

Recently, there were rumors that the recently settled Amharas in western Tigray (while their people are displaced) could be given a referendum using article 39, but the Tigrayan president openly objected to such a move.

Anything is possible in the future, but nothing of the sort will happen soon.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top