ACLED, International Crisis Group and Sahan Research are all biased in favor of Somaliland.
These three organizations, whom many westerners rely on to provide impartial information regarding Somalia, are firmly in the pro Somaliland camp.
None of them discuss the scale of human rights violations committed by Somaliland in the 8 months from Dec 2022 to Aug 2023.
They all downplay how consequential this conflict is for the politics of Somalia going forward.
Somaliland benefits from this bias as it continues to look viable as a state project although it has no control of more than 40% of its claimed territory.
Sources:
https://acleddata.com/tag/somalia/
https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/database?location[]=117
https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/database?location[]=12
These three organizations, whom many westerners rely on to provide impartial information regarding Somalia, are firmly in the pro Somaliland camp.
- ACLED has been ignoring the conflict in Sool over the past 12 months. The last report they had done regarding Somalia was in April 2021. They began to ramp up their production of reports regarding Somalia in March 2023, at the height of the Sool conflict. This makes me think that ACLED is heavily influenced by FCDO, a primary donor to ACLED, in their coverage of the SSC-Somaliland conflict. They were probably told to spam Somalia coverage to make it seem as if what was taking place in northern Somalia was just a run of the mill conflict. Of the 11 reports they have published since March 2023, not one has addressed the SSC-Somaliland conflict in which there were 5,000 casualties and more than 200,000 IDPs.
- International Crisis Group's coverage is clearly pro Somaliland, but their reporting of the facts on the ground is quite good. They consider SSC part of Somaliland and call them secessionists in their monthly "conflict tracker". They basically report as if Somaliland is a country and SSC is a rebel group. They also downplay the fact that the federal government has recognized SSC as an administration.
- Sahan Research, Matt Bryden's outfit, is out and out pro Somaliland secession, anti SSC (going as far as calling them terrorists), and pro Ethiopian MOU. Their stance is clear and their bias is not concealed. Luckily Sahan Research is known to be somewhat biased in favor of Somaliland, but the degree of bias may surprise many.
None of them discuss the scale of human rights violations committed by Somaliland in the 8 months from Dec 2022 to Aug 2023.
They all downplay how consequential this conflict is for the politics of Somalia going forward.
Somaliland benefits from this bias as it continues to look viable as a state project although it has no control of more than 40% of its claimed territory.
Sources:
https://acleddata.com/tag/somalia/
https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/database?location[]=117
https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch/database?location[]=12