Yoruba men used to loan their wives to other men and then raise the illigetimate kids

This is a level of cuckoldry I've never seen before :dwill:. No wonder modern AAs are so loose it comes from their ancestors.
"The sexual terrain of precolonial Nigeria has been subjected to varied readings in local and colonial imaginaries. Prostitution as the commoditization of sexual services didn’t exist in the local lexicon but there existed several sexual activities that fell outside conjugal relations. For instance, the engagement of women in extra-marital sexual liaisons was permissible and conducted within culturally sanctioned parameters. In Lagos and other Yoruba communities wives could take a lover, who secured her husband’s approval through payment of a fine for encroaching on “his property” and the performance of culturally approved rites. The husband remained the rightful spouse and the children born of such illicit relations belonged to the husband."

Source:Selling Sex in the City: A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s-2000s
 

Basra

LOVE is a product of Doqoniimo mixed with lust
Let Them Eat Cake
VIP
This is a level of cuckoldry I've never seen before :dwill:. No wonder modern AAs are so loose it comes from their ancestors.
"The sexual terrain of precolonial Nigeria has been subjected to varied readings in local and colonial imaginaries. Prostitution as the commoditization of sexual services didn’t exist in the local lexicon but there existed several sexual activities that fell outside conjugal relations. For instance, the engagement of women in extra-marital sexual liaisons was permissible and conducted within culturally sanctioned parameters. In Lagos and other Yoruba communities wives could take a lover, who secured her husband’s approval through payment of a fine for encroaching on “his property” and the performance of culturally approved rites. The husband remained the rightful spouse and the children born of such illicit relations belonged to the husband."

Source:Selling Sex in the City: A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s-2000s

It makes sense. Same thing happens today too- only on the down low.


Women marry 'nice' guys and sleep with a dog on the side. And on top of that get pregnant and claim the child is her husbands.


French King and English king used to do that. If they like a girl- He makes her marry an officer- and then sleeps with her and impregnates her- sometimes with the knowledge or no knowledge of the cuck husband
 
This is a level of cuckoldry I've never seen before :dwill:. No wonder modern AAs are so loose it comes from their ancestors.
"The sexual terrain of precolonial Nigeria has been subjected to varied readings in local and colonial imaginaries. Prostitution as the commoditization of sexual services didn’t exist in the local lexicon but there existed several sexual activities that fell outside conjugal relations. For instance, the engagement of women in extra-marital sexual liaisons was permissible and conducted within culturally sanctioned parameters. In Lagos and other Yoruba communities wives could take a lover, who secured her husband’s approval through payment of a fine for encroaching on “his property” and the performance of culturally approved rites. The husband remained the rightful spouse and the children born of such illicit relations belonged to the husband."

Source:Selling Sex in the City: A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s-2000s
Wooow FKD nuke!
 
Pre-Islamic Arabs did the same thing. They in fact would seek out men they deemed as strong and powerful so that they can get powerful and strong offspring.

No point looking down on a group. This is simply a by-product of Jahiliya.
 
Last edited:
Pre-Islamic Arabs did the same thing. They in fact would sought out men they deemed as strong and powerful so that they can get powerful and strong offspring.

No point looking down on a group. This is simply a by-product of Jahiliya.
Source?
 
The second type was when a man would say to his wife, when she became pure following her menses: Send for So-and-so and have relations with him. Then her husband would stay away from her and not touch her until it became clear that she had got pregnant from that man with whom she was having relations. When her pregnancy became evident, her husband would have relations with her if he wanted to. He only did that so that he might have a child with good characteristics. This kind of marriage was called nikaah al-istibdaa‘.

This is well documented. I read a book that went in detail as well. I currently don’t have the book but this should give you the gist of it. The Arabs even had a name of for it which IslamQA mentions.
 
This literally happened everywhere lol. You have to know that the concept of enforcing correct paternity and lineage were a relatively late development in human history. Julius Caesar discusses relationships in Britain at the time:

20240628_022601.jpg


So men would share wives esp if they were relatives and whoever she was married to was the dad.
 

Nin123

Hunted
VIP
This is a level of cuckoldry I've never seen before :dwill:. No wonder modern AAs are so loose it comes from their ancestors.
"The sexual terrain of precolonial Nigeria has been subjected to varied readings in local and colonial imaginaries. Prostitution as the commoditization of sexual services didn’t exist in the local lexicon but there existed several sexual activities that fell outside conjugal relations. For instance, the engagement of women in extra-marital sexual liaisons was permissible and conducted within culturally sanctioned parameters. In Lagos and other Yoruba communities wives could take a lover, who secured her husband’s approval through payment of a fine for encroaching on “his property” and the performance of culturally approved rites. The husband remained the rightful spouse and the children born of such illicit relations belonged to the husband."

Source:Selling Sex in the City: A Global History of Prostitution, 1600s-2000s
What’s yuroba? Where are they from? Europe?
 
I didn't read this in a book. I was told about it from an elder.


I won't say for obvious reasons.
Sounds rather mythical tbh. Every culture conveniently has a story of an unjust ruler doing this to signify the reprehensibleness of a leader. In Europe, it was called Droit du seigneur or prima nocta.
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top