Yemeni woman cries as she remembers woman and girls being raped and tortured by Iranian backed Houthis
- Thread starter Deleted L
- Start date
Ahmedahmed5000
Vorbeck
Another battle ground, sunnis and shia's constantly fighting. It'll only drain muslim energy and recourses.
I think it just shows that there are a lot of men who will find any excuse to rape, all they need is some chaos and they'll revert to their natural beastly state.
That's possible.
I'm not sure if they do it for pleasure or to establish their power over their victims. Maybe both?
I don't buy the 'power' excuse, if it was about power and humiliation, there are other ways to do that, for example, they could parade around or tie up their opponents etc, etc.
I donβt think itβs just power they want to display, itβs just one of the factors, maybe. I think pleasure plays a bigger part.
But whatβs more powerful to women than rape? I canβt think of any other thing that would stay with a women for life.
I think a lot of men (and people in general) are held back by the thought of prison, but if anarchy arrives, people's true nature is revealed. For example, look at how many people go on looting sprees during protests.
Rape for sure, is a lifelong trauma, but I don't believe most men are thinking at that level of 'revenge'.
Sure, anarchy makes people lose all inhibitions, just as alcohol in a smaller way which lowers peoples inhibitions, they always say drunk speech are real thoughts, I agree with you that prison and laws is big inhibitor of behaviour and without it all hell breaks loose.
I say only to impose "power" because for what reason would they make family members watch their sister or mother raped? I think show of power plays somewhat into it when you consider that.
You know what this reminds me of, those Fraternities in American Colleges, where they make new pledges do gay stuff but they'll say it's all part of "hazing", when in reality a few khaniis perverts just enjoy doing/seeing it.
Raping the enemies women is the biggest humiliation tactic you can do towards your enemies
It always been like this everywhere
There are better humiliation tactics and ways to defeat an enemy, it's just that rape is the most liked tactic for murderous males. Look at what the Ottomans and Berbers used to do? They would get women kidnapped from distant nations and they would lock them into harems and rape them, it had nothing to do with conquering new land.
We are all aware that MEMRI is a Zionist propaganda institution with an agenda. I only posted this thread to raise awareness of the war crimes Iranian backed militias are doing.
This is most certainly true. Thereβs a popular misconception that most human beings are decent people which probably isnβt even true. The only thing that prevents many, if not most people from doing crimes is when law and order prevails in society so they donβt want to deal with the harsh consequences. The moment law and order is removed and anarchy thrives is when peopleβs true colours are exposed since theyβre accountable to no one. If anarchy ever happens in the area or country you live in, lock your doors and make sure your family is safe (especially the woman) and have weapons to defend yourself, donβt even trust that nice neighbour who you think is an angel.
Kool-Aid
VIP
In wars everything is up for grabs that's why you don't start battles or if you do you better win!
If this was automatically true then there would have been mass rapes and killing during the paleolithic where states did not exist and yet all evidence suggests violence of any kind was very rare back then (96-99% of all human history) and men and women had a more commonly egilatarian relationship. Things generally went south violence wise when humans discovered agriculture:
Basically, post-Neolithic resource accumulation rich society has a way of bringing the worst out of people. What's interesting though is that when you observe Hunter-Gatherers who live pretty peacefully they didn't end up that way by chance. HGs are very aware of the worse parts of "human nature" and actively create conditions within the band that discourage it. For example, one tribe described to an Anthropologist how when a young hunter comes back with a big catch the tribe will make a point of not complimenting him too much and even being a little too critical so as to prevent him from getting big headed and thinking he's special or better than other members of the tribe and therefore that he has some right to dominate any of them. Or, for example, someone being far too individualistic and haughty will be asked to just leave like here:
Ayn Rand vs. Anthropology - Evonomics
Did natural selection favor individualists or altruists?
And that's basically a death sentence. They also just benefit from the fact that HGs do not accumulate resources and every day requires cooperation amongst the members of a band/tribe to survive. It's a lot more complex than I've made it out to be but people are not automatically just savages, saxiib. We have evil and good in us in pretty equal measure unless you're a psychopath. Post-Neolithic and especially modern society in particular just tends to prime the worst in people in part inadvertently and in part on purpose by its cultural norms.
If this was automatically true then there would have been mass rapes and killing during the paleolithic where states did not exist and yet all evidence suggests violence of any kind was very rare back then (96-99% of all human history) and men and women had a more commonly egilatarian relationship. Things generally went south violence wise when humans discovered agriculture:
Basically, post-Neolithic resource accumulation rich society has a way of bringing the worst out of people. What's interesting though is that when you nter-Gatherers who live pretty peacefully they didn't end up that way by chance. HGs are very aware of the worse parts of "human nature" and actively create conditions within the band that discourage it. For example, one tribe described to an Anthropologist how when a young hunter comes back with a big catch the tribe will make a point of not complimenting him too much and even being a little too critical so as to prevent him from getting big headed and thinking he's special or better than other members of the tribe and therefore that he has some right to dominate any of them. Or, for example, someone being far too individualistic and haughty will be asked to just leave like here:
Ayn Rand vs. Anthropology - Evonomics
Did natural selection favor individualists or altruists?evonomics.com
And that's basically a death sentence. They also just benefit from the fact that HGs do not accumulate resources and every day requires cooperation amongst the members of a band/tribe to survive. It's a lot more complex than I've made it out to be but people are not automatically just savages, saxiib. We have evil and good in us in pretty equal measure unless you're a psychopath. Post-Neolithic and especially modern society in particular just tends to prime the worst in people in part inadvertently and in part on purpose by its cultural norms.
Correct me if I'm wrong but inheritance and accumulation of wealth and passing it down wasn't a thing among hunter gatherers right? Without that, people aren't inclined to behave in their own interests at the expense of human suffering.
Murder, rape, abuse of those that are weaker goes back to money and possessions. I was reading a text about the history of female oppression and it seems once men started to pass down property and wealth, that was when women's freedom become obsolete. Draconian rules against women came about due to men's fears that another man's son might inherit. Every society had their own ways to implement these rules. FGM, Killing of rape victims, women not being allowed to inherit, women never leaving the house ect. That is why during Ancient times, the more rich and advanced a nation was, the harsher the misogyny against women was.
Even wars and anarchy goes back to wealth and the abilities to pass it down. Nations and individuals invade and loot so that they can enrich themselves and their progeny. Add power and we have a toxic mix.
Last edited:
It shows you that evil is within in man it just needs the right situation to fester up ,
My aunt told me as soon as the civil war started back home men they knew since childhood were looking for her and her friends to rape and abuse but luckily her brothers were armed .
WAR brings the demon out in men and women and children get abused the most.
Old saying but true
No one really ever wins in wars women get abused children get abused soldiers live with their evil deeds for the rest of their lives , even the men who make money from the weapons of war have blood on their hands and will pay for it in the here after .
Trending
-
-
24 men involved in the r*pe of two young sisters in Lascanood, Sool, Somalia.- Started by Devilsadvocate
- Replies: 119
-
