Inquisitive_
VIP
I came across raging feminist lib-tard SJW Somali women who is also an atheist (ironically) arguing against the existence of God/Prophets using Darwin natural selection theory, stating how only stupid dumb/inbred people would believe in such constructs, while thanking Darwin for liberating her
The ironic part in all of this is that Charles Darwin is on record to have married his cousin, so did his father and much of the Darwinian blood-line is inbred.
The funnies part of all is how Darwin thought that women were inferior likening the female brain to that of the lower class like the "Negros" whom he deemed 'most inferior', hence as a black women she is even more inferior then the already inferior white women (double insult), he uses the following Animal comparisons to further his theories.
Charles Darwin (Animal Argument for women being Inferior)
"no one disputes that the bull differs in disposition from the cow, the wild-boar from the sow, the stallion from the mare, and, as is well known through the keepers of menageries, the males of the larger apes from the females," the same must be true with human females (Darwin, 1896:563). Further, some of the traits of women "are characteristic of the lower races, and anti therefore of a past and lower state of civilization" (1896:563,564)"
Charles Darwin other Argument
a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on "Hereditary Genius" that . . . the average of mental power in man must be above that of women (Darwin, 1896:564).
Darwin is not much different to the rest of the demonic masonic occultist Europhile scientists up until the 19th century whom all held this view, so did all the students of Darwin until the Satanists realised using is better then demonising them.
http://www.icr.org/article/darwins-teaching-womens-inferiority/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_and_women
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...arles-darwin/BFC25032C289905CA3A85F0F26CFD5A2
@VixR
@Asma
@DiricLover
@TooMa'aan
The ironic part in all of this is that Charles Darwin is on record to have married his cousin, so did his father and much of the Darwinian blood-line is inbred.
The funnies part of all is how Darwin thought that women were inferior likening the female brain to that of the lower class like the "Negros" whom he deemed 'most inferior', hence as a black women she is even more inferior then the already inferior white women (double insult), he uses the following Animal comparisons to further his theories.
Charles Darwin (Animal Argument for women being Inferior)
"no one disputes that the bull differs in disposition from the cow, the wild-boar from the sow, the stallion from the mare, and, as is well known through the keepers of menageries, the males of the larger apes from the females," the same must be true with human females (Darwin, 1896:563). Further, some of the traits of women "are characteristic of the lower races, and anti therefore of a past and lower state of civilization" (1896:563,564)"
Charles Darwin other Argument
a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on "Hereditary Genius" that . . . the average of mental power in man must be above that of women (Darwin, 1896:564).
Darwin is not much different to the rest of the demonic masonic occultist Europhile scientists up until the 19th century whom all held this view, so did all the students of Darwin until the Satanists realised using is better then demonising them.
http://www.icr.org/article/darwins-teaching-womens-inferiority/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_and_women
https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...arles-darwin/BFC25032C289905CA3A85F0F26CFD5A2
@VixR
@Asma
@DiricLover
@TooMa'aan
