Uhuru Kenyatta London Investor

[DR OSMAN]

Does this guy just look like he is copying word for word western materials? he must of been taught there, the guy isn't thinking at all but applying what some other country does to his own country. He mentioned privatising energy sector which is good in one way only, their no point if private can do something to have govt do it, it's wasted effort and duplication in a way.

But the problem is, private sector are corruptible they don't really have values and will sell or give details to any nation about your energy set up, if u keep it in house might be more expensive but at least u vet the people inside and u apply proper security checks across all risks.

Do u think its wise to have profiteering ppl manage your lifelines? at least go half n half with u as majority and control the security side and standards, break up the people into groups in the energy provider and only let them know what they need to know to do the job and the one who knows the most u need to watch his ass for life dont take any risks with him and limit that group as much as possible. He needs ongoing monitoring not just one check and see ya later that one.

 

[DR OSMAN]

Even with the military, I wouldnt bring contractors in. Id send our trusted boys to go to them and have them train them and they come back and train the rest. U want to limit all the risks and people that know your life lines. Even the food services id be suspicious of as soon as their private their negiotable lol cuz thats private culture its money and interest. U cud sneak in poison into the food of their soldiers lol if u pay the right selfish private guy in that food providing for them. U can even find where the food is sourced from and work from there and inject things into it that u want. U need to do something to their weapons i dont know what but anything that unites them is fair game. ppl focus too much on individual things, u look for the groups or what they all share in common and go for that. they share water, food, weapons, and an idealogy of patriotism(media attacks critical to question the war inside them showing how their generals laughing or president is crooked lol).

War is funny game because that is serious you not coming back sxb if u dont get this right. I would even get podium or things that can elevate the soldiers when the soldiers go down and start shooting and test it in our own backyard for effectiveness use as a suprise manuever when they go down and start shooting while we are elevated up or something to change the dyanamics. we need to divide our soldiers into ground shooters and those high up basically and switch them around as the asshole on the other switches to another manuever.

U really need the most honorable ppl in the life lines not privateering ppl and they need to be very moral, patriot, not negiotable types like osama.

He wud brilliant osama sxb, thats what u call loyalty and dedication and he dont fudge around, u can actually go to sleep not worrying with those types.

 

[DR OSMAN]

But that air weapons are vicious though, that shit can get u anywhere sea, land it's like does the job whereever u need unlike the others which is restricted to land or sea. We need to develop that hardcore air stuff if we want a good military. a submarine cant get u everywhere but sea only and soldiers only on land but air stuff covers both, its the first to take out in any war is what i wud assume.

Sea wud be next i think its access point to any coastal town and they can bombard it. The last is actually military on ground but the border areas are dangerous tho they can come from there also. Border points, sea, and air in a real battle. Air needs to go first, if u have critical towns on the sea, u assign the sea buiding capabilities as a priority which somalia would have too. Major towns are on the sea., smaller towns on the border so if u have to choose a stronger navy to block other navies is paramount to save our major towns kismayo-berbera-bosaso-mogadishu where assets are that are critical for docking things.

that wud be interesting how they do military allocating n planning u gotta decide whats more important to save based on resources available. damn there is some advantage to inland countries, u dont have to waste time on sea capabilities lol. Thinking about it why are we called the SNA that means we do offensive and defensive. Are we going to go offensive in the future because if we are the name suits if were not it should just be defence force we protecting our shit only nothing else. because if you have an army or military or armed forces it can mean even u detect a threat overseas u will go and attack it where-as defence force i think means u wont do anything untill it hits your shores.

Ill check it up some defence forces if they actually do move offensively, it will be interesting.

 

[DR OSMAN]

Here is a list of defence forces. Does anyone know any that moves offensively.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Forces

I see israel on there but they move only when missiles hit them. Australia is strange, it does move apart as a coalition even if its hit or not. Ethiopia does move also but at the request of that nation not thru its own authorization. Name any one here who just moved offensively no authorization and just started hitting a country and wasnt effected by them.

Maybe it means when a threat is detected to the nation also regardless if its overseas or not. Where-as an armed forces will pursue interests even if their no threat from that nation and will use force like america does.